Maybe they do not want to pay licensing. The Wii had a weird situation where the Photo channel was updated and MP3 support was replaced with AAC.Can't play MP3 on the Nintendo DSi.![]()
Maybe they do not want to pay licensing. The Wii had a weird situation where the Photo channel was updated and MP3 support was replaced with AAC.Can't play MP3 on the Nintendo DSi.![]()
And this just in... Yes... you will be able to.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/07/amazon-confirms-yes-you-can-opt-out-of-ads-on-new-kindle-fire/
Late breaking... No... you won't be able to.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/9/7/3301108/amazon-reportedly-confirms-no-kindle-fire-ad-opt-out
Sounds like there is confusion amongst the Amazon ranks. I think it's safer to say "we'll see" then No or Yes right now
Of course you can. They are DRM-free AAC files, anything that can play AAC files can use them. And if you are one of the five people on Earth who still uses a device that cannot play AACs, you can batch-convert them to MP3s inside iTunes (or with lots of other tools).um, other than apple devices or computers with itunes installed, no... i can't. Can you?
The ads will only be on the lock screen when the device is idle.Not really. Apparently a support person said you would be able to opt-out by paying. Now Amazon's spokespeople have confirmed to multiple sites (Engadget, The Verge) that you won't be able to opt-out.
However, I don't really see this as some huge deal. Amazon is providing a very nice device at a very aggressive price. They also seem to care about the user experience so I can't imagine these ads will get in the way.
big reader? amazon kindle fire.
The Kindle Paperwhite would be the best for reading if that's going to be the main use.
Unless iPad Mini comes up with some magic that makes it less strenuous on the eyes for long reading.
That's a total deal killer for me. I was considering getting one, but I will not have ads forced upon me by a product I paid for.
So no TV, magazines, newspapers or Nascar for you, eh?
Relax. Can you read an ebook from Amazon on an iPad or iPhone. Yes. Can you read an iBook on a kindle? On a computer? No.
Can you watch a movie from Amazon on the iPad. Yes. Can you watch an iTunes movie on a Kindle fire or other non-Apple device. No.
You can argue UI all you want. My point was that if someone wants to access their content on as many different devices as possible - Amazon's media works. Apple's ecosystem does not. That's factual - not judgmental or critical.
----------
Your opinion. Lots of what Apple and other tech companies promote aren't groundbreaking or amazing. There's nothing MISLEADING about their messaging. What's misleading?
Obviously there's little that would please you. Especially since the data is offered on ATT. Enjoy your bitterness.
So no TV, magazines, newspapers or Nascar for you, eh?
Apple seems to be seriously falling behind in hardware offerings on mobile products. They need to pick things up and/or drop prices for sure.
Never mind that everyone knows Apple will be announcing a new phone tis week and a new iPad soon enough, the sales of Apple products would prove you wrong. Up until a month ago the iPhone was still the top selling phone in US. Some may say that was because of Samsung, but I would say that is because everyone has known for 6 months the iPhone was coming in the Fall.
what was your point again?
Agreed which is why I made the comment, the service is a fantastic deal.![]()
I love it; had Amazon launched with the promise to refuse anyone the right to see adds on their lock screen, I would hazard a guess, that would have been a "deal breaker" for the exact same folks.
I mean, an add sitting on your device, whilst in standby, when not in use, that disappears with 2-3 seconds of picking it up?
So I was thinking last night about the new Paperwhite display technology Amazon made where the light does not emit outward towards the reader, but instead downward towards the text.
I thought, would it be possible to take the same technology and build a television with it? How cool would that be to watch TV at night and not have tons of light blaring off the screen at you, yet you can still see and enjoy what you're watching?
You heard it here first folks! *Marches off to the patent office*
In the interest of an accurate comparison, I didn't count the e-ink Kindles because they really don't fit into the tablet category. If you want to discount color, capacity and wireless capabilities, it's simply 3 Kindles vs. 2 iPads (until a Mini is released). That's not really a big difference, compared to, say, OS X and Windows versions.
However, it's still a disingenuous argument to make because anyone buying an iPad has to make the decision. I like Apple's simple product line too. For the most part, it makes sense. But the fact is that Apple has a lot more SKU's for iPad than Amazon does for Kindle.
So I was thinking last night about the new Paperwhite display technology Amazon made where the light does not emit outward towards the reader, but instead downward towards the text.
I thought, would it be possible to take the same technology and build a television with it? How cool would that be to watch TV at night and not have tons of light blaring off the screen at you, yet you can still see and enjoy what you're watching?
You heard it here first folks! *Marches off to the patent office*