I see that you're an Aussie (or at least living there).
Maui Jim pair #2 was lifted from my checked luggage (along with my drugs) somewhere between San Jose CA and Cairns. I suspect that it happened in Los Angeles on the transfer from American to Qantas. That pair hadn't even been used - some creep got brand new Maui Jim's to sell on the street.
ps: I like Oakley's, but I have very long and full eyelashes. Most of the Oakley styles that I've tried are close to the face (especially the wraparound styles), so that my eyelashes brush against the inside surface of the lens. That's simply not acceptable. That's the main reason I bought 3 more pairs of the Maui Jim's at once - my eyelashes didn't brush against the lenses.
I had a pair of prescription Maui Jim's that cost more than an iPad. They were lost or stolen (I'm not sure which) after about a year, too. At least I got some use out of them...![]()
Hot chicks in bikinis always get the last word in TV commercials![]()
It's funny how the Apple fanboys reacted to this ad. I think Amazon did delivered the message they wanted. You love to read books anywhere get a Kindle and it does pretty well on that aspect that's it! You want more and you can afford both get an iPad too and it can do more than just reading books!
I had a pair of prescription Maui Jim's that cost more than an iPad. They were lost or stolen (I'm not sure which) after about a year, too. At least I got some use out of them...![]()
Am I the only one who was annoyed that her mouth isn't even moving when she "speaks" her last lines? ^_^;
(actually, watch the whole thing, and it's obvious that it's all post ADR, not surprising for location shooting, but still, it's not even close to matching...)
Anyone remember those old things called "books?"
When I saw that advert, my first thought was, how much did she spend on those sunglasses??. Second thought was only $139?.
I mean, okay; the iPad ads get plenty of airtime and they cost a lot more, but you get the impression that Amazon think that most people have hundreds of dollars they'll just burn on sunglasses and kindles?
She spent more than $139.
Maybe not most people, but they think that some people do....
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_s...d-keywords=gucci+sunglasses&sprefix=gucci+sun
My wife stopped using her Kindle and got an iPad after using mine. She rarely reads outdoors and usually reads in the evenings/at night, where the Kindle doesn't do so good unless you have a light.
In our home, the iPad is the winner over Kindle. Sorry Amazon.![]()
That's a nice little shot at Apple. They are pretty flippin' bad for reading outside.
But, it's pretty much all they've got going for them feature for feature.
"$139" - that gets you no apps, no extra functionality, no nothing.
When I got my iPad I handed it to my wife, who was reading her Kindle. She held it for about 5 seconds, handed it back and said "too heavy." Those 2 works pretty much summed up her thoughts about the iPad.
But she reads a lot, and likes to hold her Kindle one-handed.
The iPad is about twice as heavy as the 1st gen Kindle, and the 3rd gen is even lighter.
When I saw that advert, my first thought was, how much did she spend on those sunglasses??. Second thought was only $139?. I mean, okay; the iPad ads get plenty of airtime and they cost a lot more, but you get the impression that Amazon think that most people have hundreds of dollars they'll just burn on sunglasses and kindles?
Just makes me think she was ripped off buying those sunglasses!![]()