It'll be interesting to see how Carol deals with Sophia's fate next sub-season.
She is going to bed down with Darryl.
It'll be interesting to see how Carol deals with Sophia's fate next sub-season.
She is going to bed down with Darryl.![]()
I really liked the mid season ending. I thought the surprise was awesome. A great way to both wrap up and advance the plot at the same time.
I meant governor! I hope we get to see Michonne! Oh that would be freaking great. What would be even better is if this how we first get to meet her!
4. In the comics there is an episode devoted to the group wanting to settle down in a subdivision called Willshire Estates... before they discover it is infested with walkers. Shane and Andrea made a brief visit to a sub division looking for Sophia during Season 2.
I *really* want them to go to Wilshire Estates in the show - that would be a perfect one-two episode arc...
I have a feeling they already did, it was just the two characters though.
I refuse to get too logical about walkers (zombies) because I think it would ruin the show for me, but if I apply logic, I don't understand how these dead creatures remain animated, without any physiologic support? The most extreme case just a head, still alive, and making noises. Granted this was in the comic and I don't want to mention the context for spoiler reasons. I wonder if they ever address the issue in the story? (I've not read the comic all the way through.) I assume that if something like this happened in real life, due to lack of sustenance, would all be dead in about a month or so.
Virtually all zombie movies/shows/stories require some level of suspension of disbelief, specifically for the reasons you mention. Upon death, the body's muscles will receive no more nourishment and will atrophy, provided that they can even receive signals through a degraded nervous system. I would think that explanations for the reanimation are omitted deliberately, usually dismissed by the fact that research hospitals were overrun by the outbreak before any determinations could be made about the source of the infection.
A more plausible "zombie" scenario is exemplified by movies like 28 Days Later. Rather than being truly dead, these "zombies" are alive, yet infected with a mind-altering virus that makes them violently psychotic. However, these "infected" will eventually perish from lack of nourishment/hydration as well; they're too insane to remember to eat.
I beleive that was a nod to the comic without devoting an episode to it...
I refuse to get too logical about walkers (zombies) because I think it would ruin the show for me, but if I apply logic, I don't understand how these dead creatures remain animated, without any physiologic support?
I beleive that was a nod to the comic without devoting an episode to it...
I refuse to get too logical about walkers (zombies) because I think it would ruin the show for me, but if I apply logic, I don't understand how these dead creatures remain animated, without any physiologic support? The most extreme case just a head, still alive, and making noises. Granted this was in the comic and I don't want to mention the context for spoiler reasons. I wonder if they ever address the issue in the story? (I've not read the comic all the way through.) I assume that if something like this happened in real life, due to lack of sustenance, would all be dead in about a month or so.
Virtually all zombie movies/shows/stories require some level of suspension of disbelief, specifically for the reasons you mention. Upon death, the body's muscles will receive no more nourishment and will atrophy, provided that they can even receive signals through a degraded nervous system. I would think that explanations for the reanimation are omitted deliberately, usually dismissed by the fact that research hospitals were overrun by the outbreak before any determinations could be made about the source of the infection.
A more plausible "zombie" scenario is exemplified by movies like 28 Days Later. Rather than being truly dead, these "zombies" are alive, yet infected with a mind-altering virus that makes them violently psychotic. However, these "infected" will eventually perish from lack of nourishment/hydration as well; they're too insane to remember to eat.
In actuality, the cause doesn't matter so long as it establishes some rules that can be used for good storytelling because the real story isn't the zombies, it's how people survive and endure an apocalypse.
The thing that really gets me (and I think I'll add spoiler marks, cos this could be pretty major for people who haven't read the comics) Spoiler -> is that apparently you don't have to get bitten to turn <- Spoiler. I won't give the source, because that, too, is a pretty big spoiler.
So it doesn't really make sense at all...that's why I try not to think about it too much
(If you checked the spoiler, we can PM to discuss...)
The thing that really gets me (and I think I'll add spoiler marks, cos this could be pretty major for people who haven't read the comics) Spoiler -> is that apparently you don't have to get bitten to turn <- Spoiler. I won't give the source, because that, too, is a pretty big spoiler.
So it doesn't really make sense at all...that's why I try not to think about it too much
(If you checked the spoiler, we can PM to discuss...)
Well, so far, we've seen zombies in various states of disrepair. The barn zombies were supported by crippled chickens, so we don't know (at least in the TV series) how long the zombies can survive without eating something.
Of note, the show has scenes of zombies eating people, horses, deer, and dogs, so we know they're hunting.
Yes, assuming 'dead' is actually a metabolic halt, rather than essentially the forebrain shutting down. The episode "Wildfire" made this clear.
In actuality, the cause doesn't matter so long as it establishes some rules that can be used for good storytelling because the real story isn't the zombies, it's how people survive and endure an apocalypse.
Robert Kirkman has made this the main rule in the books (and I would assume the show as well) - The zombies are there, but they aren't the focus of the story. They're deadly obstacles to keep survivors on their toes.
Whenever I watch episodes, people are always posting on TWD forums about "bah, too much drama! Give us walkers!" But that's just not the focus and shouldn't be.
If you have walkers ALL THE TIME (or even most of the time), then you never have any character development, and he's done a great job of that in the books...the show, I have to admit, a few characters are acting a fair bit unlike the original.
I've been saying that since the beginning. They have been beating walkers to death and blood splashing on their faces(eyes?mouth?nose?) Not to mention. I love the idea of the crossbow ( I am a bow hunter myself), it's quiet. I don't know how well they wash those arrows, but Darryl had his own arrow go through his side.
It depends how infectious what ever it is, is. Some things need to go directly into the blood stream to take effect. Swallowing might not do it.
Make sense, but since it did infect what looks like 99% of the world population in what looks like a few months (based of Rick's coma). I say it it's pretty infectious, hard to believe anything could have that much effect with "just bites". I'd say improbable, but not impossible.
However the original concept was of bodies with virtually inactive brains walking about (bit like a football match) so I can believe that animated bodies, eating to keep themselves nourished, can walk about for quite a considerable time. without the brain's requirement for large amounts of oxygen I can even believe that they would survive as body parts e.g. half a torso with head.
So: for me, the only disbelief is that the characters are all walking about with virtually no security, no fortification, and usually alone; living in tents, some with no guns, and completely unbothered by creatures that appear to have wiped out the rest of humanity.
rhett7660 said:"It's quite an experience to hold the hand of someone as they move from living to dead."
Snip...
I always meant to say how appropriate that quote seems to be in this topic...where did that quote come from?