Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's amazing how narrow-minded so many people are! Do you really think this thing is going to be 'just' an e-reader? Come ON, people! This thing is going to go way beyond a simple e-reader; it's going to go way beyond a simple PDA; it's likely that this will even blow away the current 'netbook' model, though admittedly at a significantly higher price. What we don't know is whether or not this will be a viable go-between for portable and desktop power.

Take into consideration the possibility that this could be both a portable device capable of performing all of the above, as well as serving as a touch-based graphical I/O mousepad... a Wacom Tablet on steroids, as it were. I can see so many possibilities here.

None of us really knows what it will do. But to assume it's going to be as limited and weak as so many of you seem to believe just shows how little you know about Apple's mindset. They made MP3 players a 'Must Have' type of device. They made Smart Phones something that everyone wants, not just the enterprise users. Now they're coming up with something that will again change the game... maybe for the netbook market? No, it won't be cheap; none of their earlier game-changers was cheap. But they've proven that Apple raises the bar every time they release an all-new product.

Smart post. All these comments regarding an e-reader are hilarious because this reminds me of the rumors of the iPhone before Macworld when everyone was blown away. Just by the fact that Jobs says no one reads books anymore should tell you it's not solely meant as an e-reader. Chances are it will revolutionize the industry and change the way we think of computers. Apple never enters a field unless they can change the game. Out of all these rumors, no one has even mentioned the OS which is this most important well-kept secret by Jobs.

As for this story it is complete garbage. Is an analyst ever right on anything, much less Apple? I'd like to also answer some of those idiotic reports that this device will be synced to a Mac. Really? You're going to sync your 10" tablet to a 13" Macbook? Laughable.
 
They better really think this product through, and lean toward the full computer capability, otherwise, why would anyone buy just an oversize iPod when one can get a full MacBook for $1099 or a Touch for $199? Really.

Considering that Apple has never made a phone from scratch before and ended up with the iphone; I think they'll definitely exceed most analysts' expectations and come up with something much better than an oversized ipod touch.
 
The last few posts were good.

I've noticed a lot of people here have TERRIBLE ideas on what Apple "should" do. I think they need to keep their advice to themselves. So far, Apple has been doing a damn good job on most things that they do. I don't think they need advice from a forum lurker that doesn't even know what the company has in store.

:rolleyes:
 
boom

It's amazing how narrow-minded so many people are!

.......

But they've proven that Apple raises the bar every time they release an all-new product.

I agree. Like some earlier posters have said, this thing would be awesome for meetings. Just think if everyone in a corporate meeting had one? I imagine they have gleaned some valuable information from use of the iPhone in corporate settings.

With iTunesU as a backdrop, I can see them totally effing over the evil empire that is e-follet. Apple already has an enormous foothold in education this would be a boon for students. Rather than having to haul around gigantic volumes in clunky backpacks, for a grand (a fraction of the price of education these days, or otherwise subsidized by the price of books) all you'd need is the svelte Applet? plus it does everything else too and you can use it after you graduate? A no-brainer. Not to mention Apple's hire of the security guy from OLPC, I see that as being a huge market.

And of course all the other things that would make it make sense - magazines, newspapers, light productivity apps (word, excell, pages, keynote), sketching (hopefully for me!)

This thing will be about four times the size of an iPhone. If it is even close to four times as powerful, I think it could be a very robust device and accomplish all of the above and more.
 
1k

If it is around 1K full OSX is virtually guaranteed, which means count me in. It would be smart to wait until the second version of it but if it handles pdf's real well and adding notes to them I'll be in at version 0.1.
 
I would think that they want to do this in order to dictate some (technical) terms instead of Apple dictating the terms

If the consortium has its way it will not only control the standards but the distribution channel -- a bigger prize in my eyes. Publishers are obsessed with distribution -- they have not been quick to understand that on the web content wants to migrate -- and that this OK as long as your brand migrates along with the content.

Awesome. I gotta talk to my publisher and get my book formatted for this sucker!

Absolutely.

If Apple were in control of the distribution channel I would guess that they would design it like the iTunes app store -- an open platform. The publishers, on the other hand, are all over the board with this issue. The new consortium appears to be a closed club -- but we will see. But one of the consortium players, Hearst (a company worked for back in the dark ages) also has a new company called Skiff that claims it wants an open system.

Meanwhile I have 79 cent paperbacks sitting next to me that were written in the 1960's that I can pick up and read anytime I want.

And how many of those paperbacks have video embedded in them, not be mention links, the ability to buy goods and services, etc.? I love paper just like you, but this is a whole new ballgame.

It's amazing how narrow-minded so many people are! Do you really think this thing is going to be 'just' an e-reader?

True. But every time I start getting a little arrogant about how "techie" I am I remember that when I owned my Apple 2e I thought the idea of a "Mac" was down right silly -- after all, how many people really need a "mouse" or need a hard drive? Oops, guess I was wrong on that one.
 
3G on something like that...hot damn! :p

Subsidized pricing = mass appeal.

i do not agree, better they sell it worldwide direct.
i know a lot who would buy a 600$ iphone directly from apple, ...if it is available and without contract...
i do not wanna some other provider/distributor earning another 20-30% on that...
 
::yawn::

I doubt I'm the only person who doesn't give a crap about this tablet. Why do I need an oversized iPhone?

What exactly makes you think it's an overisized iPhone? Nothing has ever been mentioned about the OS it is running.

Unlike others I don't think this would run Mac OSX. I think this is a new OS. OSX was never meant to be mutlitouch. You would have seen some clues in the code indicating as such.
 
My uneducated guess would be that out of the gate (waiting on new apps) it will be able to run iPhone/Touch apps in a layer. Something like widgets look when you invoke Dashboard. Probably with the ability to run more than one at a time. This will be a temp thing until a new SDK comes out for full screen functionality.

In the mean time, Apple will go ahead with some of their own apps to kick it off (along with maybe a very select few 3rd party apps and games).

I'm certain it will end up being a lot more than just an oversized iPod Touch. Open up some BlueTooth access and it can get interesting.
I agree with this although I think iPhone / iPod touch apps will be integrated rather than on a layer. Definitely agreed with tablet-specific apps.

It's amazing how narrow-minded so many people are! Do you really think this thing is going to be 'just' an e-reader? Come ON, people!
Given that many people think that "iPhone OS" has to mean "exactly the same as an iPod touch (or iPhone) except for a bigger display," I'm not surprised.
 
Like when the raised the bar by making a sleek, good looking phone that can't multitask and it took 2 years just to get cut & paste? Or how about all the ports they have elected to leave off of their computers. Or how they made glossy-only screens on some iterations of their laptops? Or the stupid one button mouse? Oh, yeah they are the end-all and be-all product manufacturer all right. gimmie a break. They value form over function and that translates to good looking equipment that almost always LACKS COMMON FEATURES.

The first Touch didn't have a frickin' volume control button or speaker, for crap's sakes! Wake up and stop drinking the Apple kool-aide. Not everything they make is as wonderful as you've made it out to be. That's not to say I don't own a bunch of iPods, but I recognize that Apple has a long way to go to make a product without glaring omissions.

Since you've just proven how anti-Apple you are, let's consider your arguments:

"Like when the raised the bar by making a sleek, good looking phone that can't multitask and it took 2 years just to get cut & paste?"

And yet despite these so-called lacks, it sold in the millions during its first year. 'Cut and Paste?' It's more an annoyance to me than a benefit. Now the thing wants to cut and paste everything when all I'm trying to do is scroll up on the page. If you want my opinion, Apple should not have listened to the few noisy ones that thought they know what everyone else wants.

"Or how about all the ports they have elected to leave off of their computers."

I said "All New." Modifying the laptops does not qualify. And honestly, the Macs really don't have significantly fewer ports than any other machine; they just consolidated them. After all, how many of you carry 8 different devices with your laptop everywhere you go? With the 4-, 7, and even 11-port capabilities of USB hubs and the daisy-chaining capabilities of Firewire, you really don't need more than 1 of each type of port on the computer itself.

"Or how they made glossy-only screens on some iterations of their laptops?"

Personally, I prefer the glossy screen. If you don't like the reflections, just use a static-cling-type screen protector. In my own case, it's easier to see through the reflections than it is to try and squint through the glare caused by matte screens.

"Or the stupid one button mouse?"
Aside from the fact that Apple hasn't made a one-button mouse in years, you seem to think that that was the only kind of mouse Apple computers could use. Get with the times, man; I've been using 5 or more buttons on my mice since even before OS X was released!

"The first Touch didn't have a frickin' volume control button or speaker, for crap's sakes!"
Nor did their predecessors. I mean, really -- why have a cheap one-channel speaker in a device that plays in stereo? You don't need a physical volume control if you don't have a physical speaker. The iPod Touch doesn't need it and I can't really understand why Apple listened to you and put one in! The only time you need a speaker on an iPod is when you want it to alert you to something like an iCal appointment or some other alarm.

But again, I said "NEW PRODUCT." Apple's iMac MADE USB the standard; all the other companies had essentially ignored it prior to that. Apple's iPod MADE MP3s the must-have music format; the Creative and other earlier products just couldn't create a demand. Apple's iPhone MADE Smartphones a consumer device. No other company could even envision using such a device outside of the enterprise. And yes, if you go far enough back, Apple MADE the GUI the standard computing environment; Microsoft released versions of Windows before '95, but it wasn't that much better than working in a command-line interface. Microsoft's Win95 was released almost immediately after Apple lost the 'look-and-feel' lawsuit, which put Windows '95 10 years behind the Apple GUI from the outset... a lag that Windows has only just been able to close significantly with Win7.

I'm not saying Apple is the greatest company in the world; what I'm saying is that Apple has changed the existing market EVERY TIME they've released an all-new product. That's not Kool-Aid, that's documented fact.
 
I'm Game...

I'm on the fence to be truthful. I would love if it could somehow replace my iphone but I don't see them doing that. Apple wants us to have Desktop, iPhone, Macbook(Pro), and a tablet. Although if I had my say...

-Full OS X (at least iWork, iLife, and Quickbooks and other 3rd parties)
-BluTooth (keybord, magic mouse, headphones)
-iPhone Apps
-Docking station would be great (preferably a magnet arm to make it look like the imac G4):D
 
what i'd like to get, but what will not come out for sure:

The ability to clip off the display part of a MBP and use it stand alone as lower powered tablet.
they could put an additional low power system in which could be used by osx when being in power save mode, or by GCD.

and also a ssd hdd for the system and limited user data.

the remaining block would be accelerated graphics, faster cpu, bigger hdd, additional battery, optical drive, ports, keyboard and trackpad

oh i would love that thing in 10 or 13"
 
I'm on the fence to be truthful. I would love if it could somehow replace my iphone but I don't see them doing that.

If the tablet were introduced by another company I would say your concern was valid. But this is Apple remember. Introducing the iPhone did not replace the iPod, it was an enhancement. Apple still sells lots of iPods.

My guess that any tablet product would introduce features that will also be available on the iPhone and the iPod Touch. That means that iPhone users should see additional applications for their phone.

But like everyone else, I'm only guessing.

I'm like you, I doubt I would rush out to buy a tablet -- but then again I didn't buy my first iPhone until at least six to twelve months after the introduction either -- still pretty fast adaption of the product.
 
Either these "analysts" will be right this time or tablet rumors will lose all credibility (if they haven't already).

At this point I don't get the appeal of this product. Big and bulky to carry around and yet limited functionality. And I have yet to see an electronic book and magazine reader that can hold a candle to the real thing.
 
They're going to have to go totally on cool if they plan to sell this for a grand. And Apple is certainly cool, but not that cool. For music and mobile video media we have the iPhone and iPod touch; for more pedestrian computing tasks there are all sorts of light, powerful MacBooks. E-readers are hot... Toys. At around $300. Apple might be able to play at $500, but a grand? Almost everyone I know who reads a lot has too many issues w/ the Nook and Kindle and Sony Reader to even consider them. Those who have bought either admit, or deny but it's there, it's pure gadget lust; and really there are so few gadgets for avid readers they couldn't resist. But, again, most avid readers I know prefer the humble book. High on the list of features of the book is something most people don't mention when comparing them: when you're reading in bed, doze off and your book tumbles to the floor, you do not incur $300 in repair expense. In fact, amazingly, the thing still works.

My bet, if Apple ships a media tablet, they will wisely go in the $500 - 600 range. Expensive, a luxury, but not laughably ridiculous. A tablet won't properly replace a Mac laptop -- pen based input for robust tasks is by now clearly a nonstarter -- and if it can't replace a low-end MacBook, it has to come in at a price point lots of people will actually consider.
 
Take into consideration the possibility that this could be both a portable device capable of performing all of the above, as well as serving as a touch-based graphical I/O mousepad... a Wacom Tablet on steroids, as it were. I can see so many possibilities here.

:confused:

Still sounds like a macbook to me.

s.:)
 
Say goodbye to 30 pound backpacks!

Think Different!

Here's what can make Apple's iTablet special:

Apple will complete deals with the large textbook companies to sell/lease e-texts to school systems who can assign them to students who have these tablets. High school texts often sell for upwards of $100 apiece. Publisher costs are much lower for e-texts, and revised editions are more efficiently upgrade electrically. Load the iTablet with note-taking software, the abilty to paste text for auto-footnoting, colorful textbook graphics and online links. The iTablet will reinvent schooling. Say goodbye to 30 pound backpacks - insead of putting your laptop in your backback, studenst will be putting their laptops into their iTablet.

Include all the web-surfing functionality of the iPhone, all the muti-touch and gestures now available, the abilty to play and display all kinds of media, connect to LCD projectors for presentaions and to HDTV's for movies and the full iTablet app store, (developers, start your engines!), and this will be a very different device than the flimsy netbooks currently on the market.
:D
 
I'm like you, I doubt I would rush out to buy a tablet -- but then again I didn't buy my first iPhone until at least six to twelve months after the introduction either -- still pretty fast adaption of the product.

Yes, now that I think about it your probably right in you whole statement.
Second, I too waited until the 3G because it was supposed to tether...:eek::mad::confused::(:eek:;):rolleyes::p

that's really the only issue I have with AT&T.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.