Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why try to be so smart? It makes you sound like a pratt.

USB connectors don't 'bend'. They also don't have a tapered part to make it 'bend' when inserting. There is also the fact that constant bending would make the part fail prematurely.

For whatever it's worth, the USB 3.0 ports in my rMBP look slightly beveled
 
OMG, this is amazing! A USB connector that will plug in either way. My mind is racing with the possibility of how much time I'll save...

Let's see... I probably attach a USB device to some other device about twice a week on average. About half the time, I accidentally try to plug it in upside down. So, once a week I have to stop and flip the plug over. That extra step (flipping the plug over) probably wastes 2 seconds. So...

2 seconds x 52 weeks in a year = 104 seconds! Oh my, I'm going to save almost 2 minutes over the course of an entire year because of this revolutionary new USB connector!

Be still my beating heart!

:rolleyes:

Mark
 
Apple designed this particular connector.

What, 2 years after they have been commercially available to the public?
No.

----------

This guy has a great explanation as to why Apple won't:

Yeah, because we all know hundreds of people who have to get a new phone because the battery no longer holds a charge and requires 2 or 3 charges a day /s

You know..... these people.....who'd rather get a new $700+ phone instead of paying $50 to get a new battery fitted.

People come up with a lot of excuses why they need the newest phone out. The fact is, they just want the newest phone. Other people just want something to complain about.
 
What, 2 years after they have been commercially available to the public?
No

Rather than just 'No' you could have padded out your post with some facts like these...

"However, as many posters have pointed out, these reversible Type-A plugs have been around for quite some time and patent applications for them extend back as far as 2004. Apple's patent is simply more specific to their particular implementation and manufacturing processes."

Which just happen to be in the post you were quoting, but you chose to edit them out for some reason.
 
USB 3.1, Power Delivery 2.0 and the Type-C spec are actually really well done in my opinion, and I was a vocal critic of both USB 2.0 and 3.0. Read the actual specs. They fixed a multitude of sins with these revisions and finally created something that satisfies existing requirements as well as being considerably more flexible and forward-looking.

The Type-C connector will eventually replace Type-A for PC's, Type-B for devices, and Micro-A/B for portable devices, which will be awesome. This is also very likely to be the new Thunderbolt connector when Alpine Ridge and Skylake drop.

Yeah I'm behind the idea of the type C connector, just not the execution. It looks physically a lot like micro-usb which in my opinion is the absolute worst connector type that has ever existed, and I've worked with the 50+-pin centronics monstrosities. Those were pretty terrible to work with but at least they were sturdy as poop. Micro-USB, thanks to its design where there's a little tiny tongue in the chassis part, fails when you just look at it the wrong way. And the connector is just as flimsy; it just won't stand up to the repeated abuse of a regular 12-year old girl.

That is quite unlike Lightning, which was designed with such things in mind. Some people have issues with the strain relief on those cables, sure, but the actual connector part (the bit that goes into the phone) is rock-solid due to its design being so much more elegant.
 
How embarrassing that Apple did this before USB will with Type C...:rolleyes:

P.S: Am I the only one who wonders how that cable will physically fit into ordinary USB slots on laptops, etc. ?

Absolutely not! I too am just thinking.... sooooooo how am I supposed to use that in ALL my current USB devices then??

Then again this IS Apple and we all now Apple LOVES it's adapters, so expect them to sell an adapter for $30 to use the new cable with all your current devices, or give one away with this cable, but then that would make this cable totally pointless?
 
Absolutely not! I too am just thinking.... sooooooo how am I supposed to use that in ALL my current USB devices then??

The design is compatible with all (properly manufactured to specifications) USB-A receptacles. So just plug it in.
 
Please not another silly cable. Could Apple please try and use something that's a standard, rather than having to be different (albeit a little bit better) all the time. Enough with the various cables.
 
Meh current one works fine for me. This would save me what, three seconds of my life?

The current one works fine for you? Well this new one will work better. Is it affecting you in any way that Apple is releasing this?

Why can't people just be ok with this cable? Lmao how can this possibly be affecting you in a NEGATIVE way?!

Smh
 
Why publish this drivel, for something to be reversible, it needs to be symmetrical.

You plug this in one way and it will fit, reverse it and it won't, hence its not reversible.

Unless...the middle connector is flexible. It just needs to move slightly in each direction depending on which way you plug it in. Make the end a bit thinner and it will just slide into the correct position.
 
This is cool...but seems like something we should have had a long time ago.

Reversible USB was patented back in 2010.
By someone other than Apple.
Apple could have implemented this back then but then they would have had to pay the patent holder so they waited until they came up with their own very slightly different version that they are now trying to patent as a new invention.
We'll have to wait and see if Apple's version in considered different enough to be granted its own patent but except for Apple's not wanting to pay license fees, we could have had this four years ago.
 
If it's thin enough it should be good. It won't have to bend very much at all. Here's a USB 2.0 drive I have:

Image

The alignment is not perfect, but it gives an idea. It was harder to get the dead center shot with minimal shadow casting than I thought.

I wonder why they just hadn't designed the A connector this way in the first place.

Seems like it would be important to have a little tension on the conductors which a floating circuit board cannot provide. Perhaps it is bonded to the shield somehow.

I really don't understand the issue people have with USB. Are as many fits thrown over polarized AC outlets? At least it's easy to locate a USB plug properly by looking at the logo, unless the jack is vertical, or you're blind.
 
I could go on and on but suffice it to say that the level of paranoia you need to believe this **** is tiresome but then, people still think the Cubans killed Kennedy and Monroe.

I don't know about JFK, but Ricky Ricardo definitely did in Marilyn.

----------

Meh current one works fine for me. This would save me what, three seconds of my life?


Good for you! Yaay, you!!!
 
Why would they change the cable but not do USB 3?

As of current iOS devices aren't fast enough to even take advantage of USB 3. If the iPhone 6 is fast of enough where it uses the last bit of potential left in USB 2 and can still go faster then they prob will make it USB 3, if it still doesn't use USB 2 to its full potential then what is the point?
 
Finally this will come out and no surprise that Apple would. Other companies seem to not really care but this is actually quite an innovation since pretty much everyone uses or used a USB cable at some point.
 
That's USB connector(s) not a lightning connector.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD818ZM/A/lightning-to-usb-cable?fnode=3a

I may be confused here, but a lighting cable has a smaller end than a USB connector does but this pic clearly shows two usb ends, suggesting its the same usb cable, with one end just turned upside down to simulate its reversed.

It is comparing the old USB end of a Lightning cable to the new reversible USB end of the Lightning cable. They are just not showing the Lightning end of the cable because the article is just talking about the new USB end of it.
 
That's USB connector(s) not a lightning connector.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD818ZM/A/lightning-to-usb-cable?fnode=3a

I may be confused here, but a lighting cable has a smaller end than a USB connector does but this pic clearly shows two usb ends, suggesting its the same usb cable, with one end just turned upside down to simulate its reversed.

You're confused here, if you're talking about the picture on the MacRumours article which shows the USB end of two *different* cables, the current one, with the usual non-reversible USB connector, and the leaked one which is reversible. That is not two ends of one cable, the caption even says it's a current cable (left) compared to a new cable (right).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.