You're right, I should have been more polite and of course you're right that people can read. However, it seems that many don't read the original article. It's frustrating to read the forums only to see people speculating on something that is explained in the article in plain text with no room for misinterpretation. All I ask is that people read the article before jumping into the comments. It's a common courtesy, just as much as politeness is.
Oh, hello there iPad 2. I think I'm ready to purchase you.
Sorry.
This has fake all over it. "iPad 2"? Even if these are prototype images, Apple generally does not name product revisions with numerical increments (the iPhone may be an exception). As others have mentioned, a rear facing camera? I can't imagine holding a large iPad to take a picture. A front facing camera makes more sense for video conferencing.
Fake. Period.
Lol, u should really practice reading once in a while.
This has fake all over it. "iPad 2"? Even if these are prototype images, Apple generally does not name product revisions with numerical increments (the iPhone may be an exception). As others have mentioned, a rear facing camera? I can't imagine holding a large iPad to take a picture. A front facing camera makes more sense for video conferencing.
Fake. Period.
I personally prefer the look of the current design over this.
Nah, the iPad2 design unveiled last week pwns the 1st gen![]()
I love the design of the 1st Gen.. and 2nd gen...
Definitely fake, first of all, it looks just God-awful.
Second, Apple NEVER puts the generation number ANYWHERE on the product.