Weird seeing Apple follow microsofts lead. Usually the other way around.
Seeing as the A8X both CPU wise and GPU wise is not far off a current gen MacBook Air, I'd expect a generational jump coupled along with this larger device footprint capable of a larger heat sink to be on par with a dual core, entry level MacBook Pro retina in terms of benchmarks.
1811/4488
2468/4586
2593/5333
That first set of numbers needs to beat that third in my opinion. >_>
Yes it's unimaginative to have a 12 inch iPad when you are going to have a 12 inch MBA. Weren't people on this very board ridiculing Samsung last year when their Galaxy Tab Pro came out? I'm not saying there aren't people who wouldn't derive some use from a 12 inch iPad.
I'm saying it's stupid to have BOTH a 12 inch iPad Pro and MBA Air in the same product line up. It's fine (I guess) to have one or the other in the line up but having both is just asinine.
All things being "equal" what idiot would get an iPad Pro over a MBA?
Considering the current low clock, cooling, memory interface of the A8X (and not sure what 20 nm process they use, probably high performance), the hypothetical A9X (or whatever its called), could be a blast especially if they used the latest powervr GPU (the one they anounded late last year).
For 99.9% of current Ipad apps (and all non pro Mac apps), too much power... But, is there such a thing as too much power ;-).
Actually they do. They send prototypes to certain case makers, which is why on release day you can buy a case from some makers. Also Apple sends the specs out to manufacturing and those makers sometimes leak the images.I was strongly under the impression that Apple doesn't share design specs etc with third parties until they publicly announce products.
How about the "idiot" who wants touch input, say for artistic purposes or handwriting recognition? with devices like the SP3 and other hybrids, I dont see why so many people are having difficulty imagining the audience for this. That said, if it ends up simply being an enlarged iPad, then I dont see the utility in it.
That's before we mention price. All things won't be equal here if this is an iOS device. Let's face it, a larger iPad probably won't run OSX. As an iOS device it will probably follow the iOS pricing structure and start at £499/$599 for a 16GB/32GB model. That's quite a bit cheaper than the current MBA, and probably a tempting option for those after a larger screen Apple device for simple daily computer tasks.
All things being equal each user will pick the device that's best suited to them. Doesn't mean they will be an idiot if they pick the iPad over the MacBook. Some people already use iPads as their sole computer, in fact I now that I think about it I don't think my girlfriend has used the MacBook once since she got her iPad.
The OS needs updating for iPad and not just a blown up phone OS. Until that's done who really cares about the specs or how thin it is, your old one will still do everything the new one does - and that's a large reason for why the iPad sales are falling.
Oh you mean like that other company makes now?
Well reasoned arguments until you got to the price. I paid $1,000 for an 128 GB iPad Air because when I purchase something, I'll always buy the top of the line - a decision I dearly regret to this day. Because I would have been happier I suppose with the gimped entry level MBA.
With that said, yeah there will always be some people who would prefer the iPad over a computer that you can actually work on. But I'm willing to bet there isn't a large market for it. But then I think the idea of a 12 Inch MBA is stupid when you have an 11 and 13 inch model. I just don't understand what the hell Apple is doing anymore.
Even though resources isn't an issue for Apple, I do think FOCUS is and I'd rather see them focusing on things like actually releasing an updated AppleTV, bug fixing, releasing a decent MacMini, etc. Not stupid crap like this. But that's just me.
I can see some people thinking that.I'm more interested in what's under the hood, since there seems to be a bit of confusion over the OS. Will it be iOS or OSX? Some people thing because of the Pro moniker that it will be running OSX, similar to like Microsoft's Surface Pro
I would jump at a larger screened iPad. I use my iPad all the time for reading sheet music and it's almost perfect for it, just sometimes it can seem a little on the small side. A bigger screen would be ideal.
I bet they will call it "iPad Air Plus"
I sincerely hope that the "iPad Pro" is really Apple's take on the ModBook with touch optimized OS X. Because an even larger iPad doesn't seem to make any sense.
The price I stated was a guess at the entry-level price for a possible Wi-Fi only version. If you decide to always buy the top of the range model that doesn't make my points any less well reasoned. Also the entry-level MacBook Air is in no way 'gimped'. It's an entry level product for those that don't need anything more powerful.
Some people do 'actual work' on iPads everyday. PCs, all-in-ones, and laptops aren't always the best piece of tech for the job. I imagine there's a larger market for a 12" iPad than you believe.
If the 12" rMBA is released it will most likely be a product aimed at eventually replacing both the 13" and 11" MBA models. Providing a more ultra-portable product than the already thin rMBP. Doesn't seem stupid to me, in fact it makes quite a bit of sense as a way forward. One rMBA size and two rMBP sizes. Less models than we have now.
Focus isn't a problem for Apple. They're just focusing on new products that they want to sell, not the products you want them to sell.
Saying that a new Apple TV will be released when they have a product worth releasing. It's no longer a hobby product in a category on its own. The next iOS and OSX versions are rumored to be all about fixing bugs and smoothing out the user experience. Apple has repositioned the Mac Mini as the entry-level product it was originally meant to be. OSX for £399 is an amazing price, and the higher spec models are as powerful as the 13" rMBP. Seems like a decent Mac Mini to me.
The form factor looks to be the same as the current iPad, simply larger.
I would love to hear from Apple and even speculation here, what applications and uses this would be suited towards? Would everything we do now be better on this iPad, if we are at home and can have a large device? Or would some applications and uses still be better on Air 2? Or would Air 2 only be needed for a bit more portability?
At this point, it's hard for me to know what would be best for me.
I have to agree, what's the point of this?
I'm excited about Surface Pro 3 (don't have one) as I can see the usefulness.
This? I don't go "man, I wish my iPad Air 2 is bigger".
If iPad Pro is something of a SP3 clone, meh. I just don't see it. In this case, I rather have the 12" Retina MBA instead.