Vanilla35
macrumors 68040
What do you mean you have no idea if everything is in focus? You can look at the screen if you have an iPhone. The iPhone screen gets more than enough bright in direct sunlight.
[doublepost=1505728375][/doublepost]
I understand what you’re saying but I trust Apple in matters like this. This is directly from their website.
“OLED Designed for iPhone X
The first OLED screen that rises to the standards of iPhone, with accurate, stunning colors, true blacks, high brightness, and a 1,000,000 to 1 contrast ratio.”
I believe they have done their home work and we will see how good it is in little over a month.
I use sunglasses, and in direct sunlight, with sunglasses on, it could be better. Not saying that it's absolutely need it (I recognize that not everyone wears sunglasses), but it could definitely be improved.
I've notched that this spec used to be a big deal, but things have changed. After a certain point it's moot. 600 nits, 1200 nits, 2 million nits (God help us!) Overkill? 😀 Oh, and the sly Samsung keeping the 'good' screens for themselves theory, is getting old.
Well they just upgraded the Apple watch series 2 screen to have a 1000 nit OLED screen, so that 1) shows that outdoor use in direct sunlight can definitely benefit from higher brightness, and 2) apple chose not to put a brighter display in the iPhone X.
Every time I tried it, it would always end up slightly above minimum brightness despite the fact that I was in absolute darkness. That tells me it's garbage. Minimum and maximum are insanely simple, it's everything in between that is much more difficult, but of course they couldn't even do minimum right.
What you mentioned is basically the only flaw I have with auto brightness, but it is a pretty annoying one. I always have to set the brightness manually to 0, when in a very dark area; since Auto brightness seems to never bring it below that 20-25% mark. Other than that, I think it works exceptionally well.