Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It is very sad.
Now only Appleinsider is the place to go for Apple's enthusiasts.....

Mac Rumors, in my opinion once the best placed to go, is literally infested by haters today.
 
Huh. Other than MacRumors what's left for dedicated Apple news?

Think Secret is gone.
MacBytes is gone.
Macenstein rarely posts and stopped being worth reading a long time ago.
TUAW is shutting down.

What about OSX Daily?
 
I'm more shocked that AOL is still operating.

Their AOL Sessions? (I think that's what it was called) was a pretty popular live music thing for a few years until they stopped. There are a bunch of services that have kept them going, but it's kind of funny that most of them are unrelated to the original purpose of the company
 
No, Seriously

I can't be the only one here that checks The Mac Observer regularly. TMO and MacRumors are my primary sources of Apple info.
 
Huh. Other than MacRumors what's left for dedicated Apple news?

Think Secret is gone.
MacBytes is gone.
Macenstein rarely posts and stopped being worth reading a long time ago.
TUAW is shutting down.

I usually just read MacRumors and MacBidouille. Unfortunately much of the news these days is iOS-related and much less Mac-related.
 
Aw, I've found useful info on TUAW before.

----------

I'm more shocked that AOL is still operating.

Sadly, AIM is still the only thing that can take full advantage of the features in iChat and Messages. Jabber is supposed to, but it rarely works properly. So, believe it or not, my friends and I use AIM because SOMEHOW nobody has made anything better.
 
Last edited:
It is very sad.
Now only Appleinsider is the place to go for Apple's enthusiasts.....

Mac Rumors, in my opinion once the best placed to go, is literally infested by haters today.

Maybe, but the reporting on Appleinsider has become so ridiculously biased that it is difficult to take them seriously. Just read the recent report about "Why Samsung lost the thermonuclear war with Apple".
 
“As we look out to 2015, our strategy and decisions will be driven by the following organizing principles,” said Armstrong. “Number one, we’ll focus our capital allocation resource management and management time against scaled assets and platforms. Two, we will organize our asset portfolio around scaled value and scaled growth assets. Three, we’ll simplify everything that can be simplified.”

They take classes in speaking this sort of drivel, right?
 
"Number one, we’ll focus our capital allocation resource management and management time against scaled assets and platforms. Two, we will organize our asset portfolio around scaled value and scaled growth assets. Three, we’ll simplify everything that can be simplified"

Let me interpret this for those who are befuddled by this corporate speak.

Number one: We are going to scale down our biggest asset: Our employees

Number two: Heisenberg may have said we can not have both growth and value at the same time. True, but we can get around that by scaling down both. No growth, No value. Problem solved.

Number three: Having done one and two, things are so simple that even a sixth grader can run AOL.

Yours Truly
Always On Lifesupport
 
Last edited:
TUAW was never one of my read-first Apple news sites. AOL CEO Tim Armstrong is the devil. He's one of the most shameless purveyors of clickwhoring, and tries to institutionalize those practices with whatever sites AOL controls. And the writers generally get shafted, as those that actually get paid are given crumbs. AOL has become a fairly large and unwieldy content conglomerate, so it doesn't surprise me that they would try to fold TUAW's audience under the Engadget umbrella.

As for other sources of Apple news, my go-to site is John Gruber's daringfireball.net. Good content, spot-on analysis, refreshingly free from linkbaiting, and no comments. The last few days, he's been emptying out the Claim Chowder drawer, which is always good for a laugh.

loopinsight.com is Jim Dalrymple's site. Another good content aggregator, with some original Apple content and good coverage of music apps in particular.

asymco.com is a great site for industry analysis, with a lot of Apple coverage. Horace Deidu gets it right more often than not, and lays out his data in an easy-to-understand format. His approach is the exact opposite of Henry Blodget's temple-of-market-share sensationalism on Business Insider, and that's a good thing. Deidu seems to be doing a lot more consulting lately, so the site does not get updated as often as before.

Fortune removed Philip Elmer-DeWitt's Apple 2.0 blog a few months ago. But, you can still link to his latest articles using this link. PED has followed Apple longer than most bloggers, and has a good understanding of what makes the company tick, and good insights on what most analysts consistently get wrong about Apple.

Another site that focuses a lot on Apple is technightowl.com. I believe that the site mod used to work for Apple, and he has a good grasp on how Apple fits into the big picture. The site posts fewer but longer articles than other tech blogs. The site doesn't seem to get a lot of traffic, as most of the articles generate zero comments.

Other good sites include techpinions.com (good analysis, although a lot of the best content is now behind a paywall), ben-evans.com (very insightful articles, but the output has dropped off since Mr. Evans started a new consulting gig) and stratechery.com (Ben Thompson's latest article on what most analysts get wrong about Apple is a must read).
 
Last edited:
I love(d) TUAW's weekly rumors roundup.. particular how it takes/took MacRumors (and others) to task for taking analysts, DigiTimes, and renders seriously.
 
Maybe, but the reporting on Appleinsider has become so ridiculously biased that it is difficult to take them seriously. Just read the recent report about "Why Samsung lost the thermonuclear war with Apple".

That's only Daniel Eran Dilger. His over-the-top writing style is ready-made link bait. Even though he's obviously biased, his analysis ends up being right more often than not. Certainly, a lot more reality-based than the anti-Apple link bait that gets posted on Business Insider or Forbes ("contributor network").

Plus, the other articles on that site are more objective. And IMO, more objective than most of the front page articles on Macrumors, which tend to take the negative spin like a lot of the posters on this site.
 
I guess I was the only one who went there daily to check the deals on apps, right after checking out rumors here on MacRumors. They had a great daily list of lowered prices or newly gone free apps. I just bought a bluetooth shower speaker from their deals page today before I read about the shutdown.

I will miss TUAW.
 
That's only Daniel Eran Dilger. His over-the-top writing style is ready-made link bait.

I just googled him and was shocked he is an adult. What an incredible douchebag. How can one take an article serious that is titled "After Apple Inc. dodged the iPhone 6 Plus BendGate bullet, detractors wounded by ricochet"?
 
Last edited:
I just googled him and was shocked he is a grown-up. What an incredible douchebag. How can one take an article serious that is titled "After Apple Inc. dodged the iPhone 6 Plus BendGate bullet, detractors wounded by ricochet"?

He's a textbook case of someone who's their own worst enemy. Once you get past his many rhetorical excesses, he actually makes a lot of good points. Yeah, between his articles and his forum rebuttals (his screen name is Corrections), he just comes across as an a**wipe. Unfortunate because his articles on the timelines for Windows and OS X (on his own roughlydrafted.net site) are actually some of the best historical perspectives I've read.

The other contributors on AppleInsider are a lot more objective.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.