They take classes in speaking this sort of drivel, right?
Yup. It takes a lot of training and a good bit of talent to ramble on like you're saying something important without really saying anything at all.
They take classes in speaking this sort of drivel, right?
Must be another slow news day. What does AOL have to do with Apple?
Well you can start by simplifying number one and number two.
They take classes in speaking this sort of drivel, right?
9to5
I guess all those AARP members have to get their services from somewhere.
He's a textbook case of someone who's their own worst enemy. Once you get past his many rhetorical excesses, he actually makes a lot of good points. Yeah, between his articles and his forum rebuttals (his screen name is Corrections), he just comes across as an a**wipe. Unfortunate because his articles on the timelines for Windows and OS X (on his own roughlydrafted.net site) are actually some of the best historical perspectives I've read.
The other contributors on AppleInsider are a lot more objective.
Are you kidding me? The ones that threadjack almost every thread into "Obama is a terrorist" and "white people rule"?![]()
I wasn't talking about the forum posts, I was talking about the articles on the front page. So, no I'm not kidding you or anyone else.
I used to really enjoy As the Apple Turns. I thought it was very entertaining.
Maybe, but the reporting on Appleinsider has become so ridiculously biased that it is difficult to take them seriously. Just read the recent report about "Why Samsung lost the thermonuclear war with Apple".
That's only Daniel Eran Dilger. His over-the-top writing style is ready-made link bait. Even though he's obviously biased, his analysis ends up being right more often than not. Certainly, a lot more reality-based than the anti-Apple link bait that gets posted on Business Insider or Forbes ("contributor network").
Plus, the other articles on that site are more objective. And IMO, more objective than most of the front page articles on Macrumors, which tend to take the negative spin like a lot of the posters on this site.
I just googled him and was shocked he is an adult. What an incredible douchebag. How can one take an article serious that is titled "After Apple Inc. dodged the iPhone 6 Plus BendGate bullet, detractors wounded by ricochet"?
"As we look out to 2015, our strategy and decisions will be driven by the following organizing principles," said Armstrong. "Number one, we'll focus our capital allocation resource management and management time against scaled assets and platforms. Two, we will organize our asset portfolio around scaled value and scaled growth assets. Three, we'll simplify everything that can be simplified."
I'm more shocked that AOL is still operating.
Scaling from a corp standpoint means, "We are laying off people until we get to a point where we can liquidate the company and make a bit of profit"LOL @ simplify ... scaled assets, scaled platforms, scaled value, scaled growth ... BS meter reaching max level.
Huh. Other than MacRumors what's left for dedicated Apple news?
Think Secret is gone.
MacBytes is gone.
Macenstein rarely posts and stopped being worth reading a long time ago.
TUAW is shutting down.
Are you Mike Flynn?