If mods are expected to keep communities open, why are communities able to be made private in the first place? That makes no sense (like the rest of your arguments).
They weren't warned, they were threatened. And you still have yet to provide a single rule they have broken.
"effectively removing advertising for those subreddits" - aha, now you admit the truth, it wasn't about breaking the rules, it was about Reddit losing revenue from the free content the users produce for them.
Sure you don't.
You're the one defending Huffman not me.
>If mods are expected to keep their communities open, why...
Don't ask me. Ask reddit. They make the rules.
>They weren't warned, they were threatened.
They were warned.
>And you still have yet to provide...
You can read the moderators code of conduct that they all agreed to here:
www.redditinc.com
I'd quote specifically the rules the mods broke, but the site isn't loading right now. If it does, I'll come back and edit it.
[Edit: Rule 4]
>aha, now you admit the truth
What do you mean "now I admit the truth?" Nobody's been dancing around this. Advertising is how reddit makes money. I worked most of my career in advertising. I LOATHE ads, but outside of reddit charging users a monthly fee (which I suppose they sort of do with reddit premium), you're gonna see ads. That's how they make money. This shouldn't be some big shocking reveal moment for you as if you've won the argument. Reddit makes money from ads. And when large communities shut down indefinitely, or switch to NSFW out of protest, reddit doesn't make money, and that violates the moderator code of conduct. This isn't the mystery you seem to think you just solved. This "free content users provide for them" thing is such a joke. Yeah, dude, it's a social media site. If you aren't paying for the product, you ARE the product. That's not unique to reddit. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Twitch, TT literally all work the same way. Welcome to 2023!
>Sure you don't.
Why would I lie about this, or anything in a discussion? Besides, I'm sure reddit employees are prohibited from talking about this publicly. They're likely not authorized to represent the company on this matter. Either way, I don't work for reddit. If you don't believe me, oh well.
>You're the one defending Huffman not me.
I wouldn't say that I'm defending Huffman as much as I'm pointing out how ridiculous people are acting about this. The reality of this situation is, a small, but vocal minority of Reddits users seem to think that they actually own the site, and that they decide the direction the company goes in. They don't. They're upset that they're losing an app they like. That's it. Christian Selig is a literal millionaire. All the money he made was based on what reddit created and maintained for him, and users. So if you want to go after reddit for taking advantage of free content users give to them, then you must really have an even bigger issue with Selig, since he took advantage of a platform he didn't build, and didn't pay to maintain, AND the free content users provided, and then had the gall to charge users a monthly, or lifetime fee on top of that. He made millions. Stop purposefully missing the point here.