Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Reddit makes money from advertisement, not the content creators.
And Apollo makes money purely from being bought on the App Store, not from calling reddit's APIs. If I buy the app and never even open it, Apollo still makes $$$.

The advertisement pays because people visit the site, and people visit the site because of...the content that they don't pay anything for.

Your mental gymnastics don't work, sorry.
 
anyone as in the developers who rely on the API? of course they're going to think it's higher than reasonable, why wouldn't they?

doesn't mean they're right.
“Anyone” as in industry watchers making predictions based on all their knowledge of other similar services.

Reddit is asking 50x the price of other services. Twitter is asking 200x, so they’re not the worst here, but do either of those strike you as serious offers?

If I tried to sell you a candy bar for $100 would you believe I actually wanted you to buy it?
 
What’s up with the guys on here who will immediately repeat any cooperate PR statement and fight for it to the death? I don’t even think you could pay me to shill this hard. The other day we had the netflix thing and now we have this. In both cases, the companies even used to encourage the behavior they now have randomly decided is off limits.

Reddit didn’t even have an official mobile app until a few years ago. They used to recommend you use third party apps. Nothing is wrong with them wanting money for their API, but the price is outrageous.
 
Wait, so did he make a bad business decision, or did he make millions of dollars? I'm trying to understand what your point is, but you're contradicting yourself.

Both can be true. Was it smart that he based his entire business on another business? No. Did it work for a while? Yep. Is that gravy train over now because the other business changed and his business is no longer compatible? Yuuuuuuuup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdoherty
When Microsoft see's a product/business that can enhance/improve their own products, they buy that product/business
When Google see's a product/business that can enhance/improve their own products, they buy that product/business
When Apple see's a product/business that can enhance/improve their own products, they buy that product/business

When Reddit see's a product/business that can enhance/improve their own products, they get that product/business shutdown.

note: I have no doubt there are examples of Microsoft, Apple and Google getting products/businesses shutdown but for the most part they buyout the product/business rather than having it shutdown. So please, we do not need to see examples of this.
Yes they buy that product/business. And subsequently shutdown/merge. The point is, big companies uses their seemingly Massive marketing power to squeeze out competitors with superior products that may or may not rely on them to function. In the end, the market becomes less competitive because good small ones are gone, and big ones become complacent and arrogant (yeah we are too big to fail). End user will always be that loser.

This is why competition requires law and regulations to protect, rather than letting market do its thing. Sadly, those very law and regulations have all been tainted in a way that benefit big companies anyway, making them virtually useless. Maybe this Will be the world we will have to deal with in the next decade.
 
Holy hell, just the REFUND would be around a quarter million dollars? That's serious money! I can see why Reddit wanted a piece of that pie. It sucks that they utterly refused to negotiate though, because I'm sure if they had a deal would have been struck that could have been profitable for all parties.

It's really frustrating to see companies behaving this way. It used to be that companies would negotiate and work out deals to everyone's satisfaction. Lately it seems to be more "IT'S OUR WAY OR THE HIGHWAY" and not listening to anyone, even when millions of people are yelling what a horrible idea it is.
That money is negligible. The problem is that Reddit loses more money because these clients don't include ads.
 
So lifetime subscribers get a refund? You would think that if someone paid for a lifetime, and they are indeed not getting a lifetime of use, that it should be refunded, no?
Lasted the lifetime of the app’s possibility of existence.

That money is negligible. The problem is that Reddit loses more money because these clients don't include ads.
None of the major developers of reddit apps are saying the API should stay free. They’re saying it shouldn’t be an order of magnitude more expensive than what Reddit makes off of the average user, ADS INCLUDED. I believe the Apollo developer even said adding ads to the API calls was reasonable. It’s not his fault that Reddit never included this in their post fetching API.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I said it another comment and I'll say it again. Neither this nor Twitters API changes have anything to do with the 3rd party apps. Every content source is in the process of either a) locking their content down or b) figuring out how to charge LLMs/AIs for that training data. Unfortunately for the data sinks, the big LLMs have already downloaded all historical data, but they will want ongoing data and that's where these API charges are meant to make money from.

The apps are just casualties.
 
You’re taking the side of a greedy, giant corporation and blasting an indie app developer asking for fiscal consideration from a tiny amount of users who might minimally mitigate his losses perhaps 5%. As a default action, most uninformed customers will just indifferently accept their refund. Basically he’s burying his labor of love, his proverbial infant… and you’re saying “your baby sucked, better it’s dead.”

Getting it?

It’s tasteless and shameful of you to crap on the little developers who truly make iOS special and root for giant, faceless corporations. Particularly when you’ve never opened Xcode and shipped your own apps. It’s unlikely Christian got Taylor Swift, or even Marco Arment level rich from Apollo.
Taylor Swift level rich? She is one of the richest people on the planet. Who gets that rich? The developer could have made millions or tens of millions making them in the top 0.1% of the US and 0.001% of the world. We dont know.

I dont care about apollo - not a user. I think he is a poster here and as such deserves our respect and if his app was great our praise. But he is a corporation just like Reddit and if bigness is automatically bad then Apple is the worst, right? There is no intrinsic virtue in rooting for the little guy and no intrinsic evil in being a big successful organization (or the govt would be the worst of all). And there is rarely a simplistic black and white "Good guy" when corporations are fighting - which is all this is despite all the constant moralizing about it. This is a fight between a big corporation and a small corporation. Take sides with your money and interest if you care...but all the efforts to cast this as some sort of moral crusade are super tiresome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MareLuce
Assuming those LLMs haven’t already scrapped everything of value off Reddit. Now won’t that be the sweetest irony of them all?
This is a pretty big point. It is just as likely that the models are scraping the site as it is they are calling API. Sure API would be more efficient but do you really think that any of those data vacuums will pay the API rate when they scrape for free. RPA and screen reading is not as efficient as bulk query of posts but it is free. If Apollo was going to run $20M / year for its API access then the sheer volume of calls by any of the LLMs would be astronomical. No one is paying that kind of fee for access to API at that scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zach-coleman
Both can be true. Was it smart that he based his entire business on another business? No. Did it work for a while? Yep. Is that gravy train over now because the other business changed and his business is no longer compatible? Yuuuuuuuup.
LOL why the hostility to the dude? Ahhh I get it, you're jealous! So now to make yourself feel ok about your own timid, risk averse approach to life, you have to peddle the idea that what Reddit has done is perfectly reasonable and that the Apollo dev *deserved* to go out of business...which is a staggeringly naive and myopic view of how Reddit and businesses in general function.
 
Reddit is pretty terrible anyway.
To me Reddit remains a least a little more user-centric and actually on-topic, as opposed to the toxic cesspit from Hell that Twitter has become (to name just another social network).

But these drastic changes that impact developers, and thus users, are not good news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saladin12
Take sides with your money and interest if you care...but all the efforts to cast this as some sort of moral crusade are super tiresome.
The morals around this are pretty muddy, but what is 100% clear is that Apollo directly and indirectly made Reddit a better experience for everyone, and Reddit's crazy pricing policy has now directly made it a worse for everyone.

Quite why anyone sticks up for reddit in this case I don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zach-coleman
I said it another comment and I'll say it again. Neither this nor Twitters API changes have anything to do with the 3rd party apps. Every content source is in the process of either a) locking their content down or b) figuring out how to charge LLMs/AIs for that training data. Unfortunately for the data sinks, the big LLMs have already downloaded all historical data, but they will want ongoing data and that's where these API charges are meant to make money from.

The apps are just casualties.
Twitter manually revoked API access to popular apps over the course of a day, it was not an automatic cutoff. They could not restart their apps even if they paid the outrageous API costs. It was two birds one stone.

Reddit could offer a separate deal for standard API calls and API calls intended for apps on a case by case basis if they did not want to kill 3rd party apps. It’s not like there’s more than 20 that are worth even mentioning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anoobis and 123
In my opinion there are many people across a number of threads on this topic who have got the wrong impression about the app and who uses it because reading posts from those who post about their experience of using the app, it would appear they are doing so from a 'general users' point of view and this is wrong. People need to have been following this issue from the start because if they had then they would have realized the issue is not about general users losing the app but probably the app's most ardent supporters which is reddit moderators. reddit's own app is woefully inadequate for moderators needs of which moderators from across the spectrum of reddit have been trying for a number of years to get reddit admins to fix the apps shortfalls and as yet nothing has been done. There is/was a very well written article from one of the mod's of a very popular history subreddit that went into detail about the problems reddit moderators faced with reddit's official app, their requests to have things changed/improved and the results of those requests. Therefore, in absence of reddit not fixing the problems with their own app, reddit moderators turned to 3rd party apps, notably Apollo where they found they could use their moderator tools way more efficiently than they could with reddit's official app and this is where the problem lies with reddit's CEO taking the action that he has.

The article written by the mod of the history subreddit gives dates on when numerous requests were made through reddit's official channels on wanting improvements made to the official app and it gives us a glimpse of the problems reddit moderators face with reddit admins not listening to them and leaving the app in it's still unusable state for moderators and the concern reddit moderators will face when Apollo is shut down and they will have to revert to using an app that reddit has refused to improve to help moderators to be able to do their jobs better.

Whilst Apollo was seen as a good app for those wanting to view reddit on their mobile devices, it served as an invaluable app to reddit moderators due to the efficiency and ease it allowed them to use reddit's moderator tools. That's like telling a cleaner all their cleaning items will be removed and all they got to use now is a small hand cleaning rag because the cleaning company has not got around to dealing with official internal requests for issuing proper cleaning items.

How many of us have faced situations in life where we've come across a problem, noticed an issue or situation that you know can be improved upon and thus improve the life of others and you've gone 'I will deal with this myself'. You then go get your own tools or own other items and proceed to work on the issue/situation and make it better, make it more efficient and those who's lives have been improved thank you immensely for the work you have done only for someone to come along and say 'now go put that back how it was, I do not want it like that'. You feel frustrated and deflated because your improvements have not been appreciated and those who's lives you improved now feel angry, frustrated and hurt because they are not being listened to.

Reading reddit posts from numerous subreddit moderators, this is how I think they feel with reddit CEO causing Apollo app to shutdown.
 
He probably didn't even manufacture his own PC components or the chair he sat on. *~~WhAt a LeEcH~~*

He should retire and be a trucker, they don't rely on anyone else to earn a living. 🙃
Oh fun, hyperbole! Point is, his business depended entirely on another business who charged nothing for their API. Now they do and his business is forced to close. In most lines of work, if a supplier you work with folds or increases pricing, you could shop elsewhere. Selig doesn’t have that option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I never shed a tear for rich people or corporations.

Get something for free then complain when they raise the price? There’s some hubris and entitlement there.
 
I like your stance. That said, Apple should charge double for all their products, because they're a business and should suck every penny it can from consumers.

You're on board with that, right?
They could charge double, but if consumers are dumb enough to keep paying, they reap what they sow.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.