The old version (before Cheetah Mobile brought out the original developer) of ES File Explorer was great. Now it's all spyware and data mining. Pretty much everything that used to be great got brought out by Cheetah Mobile. I still have the old, old version of ES File Explorer on my phone which is only possible because of sideloading.
You stated ES Explore being banned but show ES Explorer Zip Unzip in iOS.
Credit card companies can only do so much. Visa and Mastercard now require merchants to have chip readers, if a merchant only has a swipe machine, then that merchant becomes responsible for any fraudulent charges. So they would need to check IDs and signatures for all purchases.
The. Report this to Apple vs just posting on these forumsFeels empty and flat when the app store is still plagued with predatory loot boxes and such abounds.
Take this for instance, apparently being allowed by Apple? They lose any moral high ground imo.
Diablo Immortal impressions: A good smartphone game saddled with F2P nonsense
Great ARPG-on-phone production values hampered by terrible economic decisions.arstechnica.com
I’d believe Apple is more transparent than shadow banning on Twitter.
I think the first question is, is the claim verifiable? Who else besides Apple has access to this data?
Opinionated statement based on the default, not forced, option for iPhone users just as any other browser for PC except Brave browser who’s been proven to have issues in its startup from the beginning (search security sites).
The store is almost never involved in fraudulent charges. It is entirely worked out between the user and their bank. Target isn't going to step in and prevent fraud.
They have no interest in doing so and don’t have the mechanisms designed for it. Google has the resources but chooses not to because a lockdown of the OS would lock them out of the data they created the OS for.
It does not. I personally rarely use Google for search on my devices. I use duck duck go.
As long as Target is using the approved equipment required by the bank. It's in their contract to have chip readers(EMV complaint), if they don't they responsible for fraudulent charges. Same as if they accepted fake money, they wouldn't take it to a bank and say "we didn't mean to take this fake money, but we'd like you to swap it out."
With millions of Apps in play, it sounds like the gates are flooded with criminals trying to slip through the cracks. It’s like a patrolman not answering cat rescue calls while being overwhelm with 5-10 robberies a shift.
Strawman, bro. No one is making the claim that there are no copycats outside the AppStore. Hail, there are more copycats apps in the PlayStore, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
For those who love the App Store, sideloading and/or the presence of third party stores will in no way compel them to abandon Apple's store.
Nothing. The very thing that some railed against csam for, will be a piece of cake for governments with unfettered access.
The data is Google is paying $11 Billion/year to Apple, 82% of Google's revenue coming from ads, and targeted ads earning much more for Google's than the non-targeted ads Google's competitors have to settle for after Apple's app tracking transparency changes. Where do you think Google is getting the data for targeted ads on iOS?
