Unfortunately most of the money you donate to the Red Cross won't make it over to Japan to help the victims. People should research charities to make sure 100% of donations goes to helping people and not into the pockets of the operators.
Unfortunately most of the money you donate to the Red Cross won't make it over to Japan to help the victims. People should research charities to make sure 100% of donations goes to helping people and not into the pockets of the operators.
Unfortunately most of the money you donate to the Red Cross won't make it over to Japan to help the victims. People should research charities to make sure 100% of donations goes to helping people and not into the pockets of the operators.
WannaGoMac said:I assume apple isn't taking 30% of all donations?
Hehe... my first (cynical) thought exactly.![]()
Unfortunately most of the money you donate to the Red Cross won't make it over to Japan to help the victims. People should research charities to make sure 100% of donations goes to helping people and not into the pockets of the operators.
...
Donation amounts range from $5 to $200, and the entire amount is sent to the American Red Cross.
...
I assume apple isn't taking 30% of all donations?
Hehe... my first (cynical) thought exactly.![]()
i like how apple would encourage our donation, yet fail to do the same. Especially with a company doing a lot of business in Japan.
Unfortunately most of the money you donate to the Red Cross won't make it over to Japan to help the victims. People should research charities to make sure 100% of donations goes to helping people and not into the pockets of the operators.
Somehow, I doubt that. Or did I miss something in their financial reports?
I have no doubt that if Apple announced that they were donating $100,000,000 to help the relief efforts, we'd see comments here about how they were making a PR move by announcing it and not just doing it.
I challenge everyone to research a little
Err... yeah!
That's what big companies do. "Corporate social responsibility" = good PR. Directors of companies are under legal obligations to make as much money as possible for the share holders and can be sued if they don't. Giving charitable donations is great (and I'm sure the people who decide to do it are very pleased to be able to help) but it creates good PR which leads to more money for the company in the long run.
I think it is a bit naive to think big companies are interested in anything other than profits.
And of course there will be a subscription. That charges you automatically every month
i like how apple would encourage our donation, yet fail to do the same. Especially with a company doing a lot of business in Japan.
With people buying new Ipad 2s on the day it happened, it looks like Apple could part ways with some of the profits.
Honestly, I'm getting a little tired of the degree of Apple cynicism around here.
Honestly, I'm getting a little tired of the degree of Apple cynicism around here. These forums seem to have become the "let's find something to criticize Apple for" boards. I mean, really, this is a good move on Apple's part and yet nearly half of the comments so far are negative like this, not to mention the fact that the article clearly stated (as quoted with emphasis add) that the entire amount goes to the Red Cross.
You can always donate directly to your country's Red Cross or other aid organisations that specify the funds are going towards the quake.
http://donations.redcross.org.za/ (though it seems a bit ambiguous only saying "flood victims 2011")
https://www.redcross.org.au/Donations/onlineDonations.asp (this one lists the earthquake and flood explicitly)
Otherwise you can always donate via Google to the Japan RC:
http://www.google.com/crisisresponse/japanquake2011.html