Oh, goody, a bigger screen for iOS7! All that glorious white space with really-too-skinny-to-be-functional, light grey Neue Helvetica... gone to waste.
Just curious what "innovation" your life is missing right now? I don't need innovation for innovations sake or because some techies are bored. This Tuaw piece sums it up nicely for me:
It is the innovation that will propel AAPL back to a reasonable trading multiple - it is an investors perspective that I am commenting from. Additionally, Tim has been talking on and on about the new product categories for 2013 and 2014 - time to deliver is upon him - tick tock tick tock.
From your question though:
ala carte Apple TV content so I can cut the cable
vastly improved Apple TV interface
Apple TV 4k capability
4k monitor
Aperture 4 raw processing and faster / expanded camera compatibility
Improvements in Maps, Siri
The list could go on depending on who you ask.
You think only Apple is responsible for or can deliver ala carte TV? Blame the content providers, not Apple.
If the next iPhone fails to be 'new or innovative', is it all on Tim Cook? Or did Steve have hands in this model, too?
The iPod only ran its course because an entirely new product category (the iPhone) essentially supplanted it. Android is providing what Apple doesn't but it hasn't created a new product that renders the iPhone obsolete, so I don't think the iPod comparison is applicable here. If Apple figures out a way to compete on cost, features and screen size, they'll be right back in the game.I agree and disagree. I'm not sure where to take a stance. While the iPhone is about to be 8 years old, people continue to buy it (and smartphones). I don't see smartphones dying out any time soon. But then again, who knows
He is obviously joking. Do you think Apple can actually create a shrink ray?
Come on mate, NZ'ers are meant to be good with sarcasm
----------
Steve.
If they end up listening to the market, then they'd be facing the "innovators dilemma" which Jobs (I believe highlighted as a favorite book). It's not about giving consumers what they want. Apple will fall behind listening to their customers' needs.
Edit: Apple can't get caught up in current needs. It needs to look to the future.
What Apple Needs is New Innovative Products. The iPhone this June will be almost 8 Years old. The iPhone Gravy Train is almost over. Its time to invent some new products. Just like the iPod had its run, The iPhone run is coming to a close soon.
I wonder if Apple has similar slide decks about the Mac Pro line, saying:
•Strong demand from Pro-customers wanting *dual* or even *quad* CPU-sockets, plenty of internal storage bays, user replaceable GPUs with offerings from nVidia and AMD, 8+ Ram sockets & larger, 4K MATTE screens.
•Competition has drastically improved their hardware offering.
I think these slides may have gotten lost when they got around to designing the nMP.
Are you listening Tim???
![]()
I personally just like using one hand to do everything on my iPhone 5.
I'm probably in the minority, but I hope they still make 4" versions in the future. There's still a large group of people who would prefer easy one handed operation.
Are you aware that internal SATA would severely throttle the capacity of the 2013 MP architecture? Just because SATA is prolific and legacy, doesn't mean the line is drawn there. Thunderbolt is MUCH faster - who cares about internal bays? People with no vision. Daisy-chain with WAY more devices, or limit yourself to a fixed number of internal bays?
I'm sorry but this is an overrated, old and tired excuse. One hand operation in touchscreen era is complete BS.
Yes you can operate iPhone using one hand. Then I can do it on a big Android too. But the point is, one handed operation is not comfortable for a long period. It's for emergency situations for when it's not possible to use your phone with both hands e.g when you're commuting, eating, cooking etc.
For regular use, two hands operation is the most efficient and comfortable. I could type faster, and more accurate.
So I would gladly embrace the new bigger iPhone.
it's almost impossible operating my GN3 with one hand
nice thing about iphone was you can walk, read email and operate it at the same time with one hand
This isn't remotely accurate. What remains to be seen is whether the SATA lanes provided directly by the chipset go away on a future revision.
That you state that they would limit themselves to a fixed number of bays shows that you are either ignorant of the technology or extremely disingenuous. Oddly I bet on the latter, although I don't know why you would choose to misrepresent such a thing.
They aren't compromising on quality by going with a 5c. The 5c is outselling every other phone on the market other then the 5s.
It will be suicidal if they don't offer a 4" flagship model alongside a 5"+, say iPhone 6 and iPhone 6XL. It's not a zero-sum game w/ sizes, but rather the more the merrier, something for everyone. Apple's problem now is one size (and essentially price too) fits all, except it doesn't apparently.
This is how you know Apple is going to fail. Nobody in the media or the public remembers of course because that would require some degree of intelligence but Steve Jobs famously said "the customers do not know what they want". When asked about market research.
You think Steve Jobs asked the customers when he came up with the iPhone and revolutionized the cell phone market forever?
I am ashamed of the mediocrity of Apple executives.
This isn't remotely accurate. What remains to be seen is whether the SATA lanes provided directly by the chipset go away on a future revision. Thunderbolt as of today is actually slower than preceding solutions. There are many more stable DAS solutions running SAS connections than you can find with thunderbolt. As for daisy chaining, you only have a fixed amount of bandwidth, and many of those DAS enclosures don't support daisy chaining anyway. It requires a different thunderbolt chip and further validation. That you state that they would limit themselves to a fixed number of bays shows that you are either ignorant of the technology or extremely disingenuous. Oddly I bet on the latter, although I don't know why you would choose to misrepresent such a thing.
The phone that came out in 2007 will be 8 years old in 2014. The math isn't that complex.