Seems like that article was simply about updates (in particular major new version) deliberately slowing down devices for no reason other than to make them slower so that people would buy newer devices. For example, what is being discussed here wasn't anything that was added/changed when iOS 11 came out, or iOS 10 came out, when most of these type of discussions start to appear, while the changes related to what was discussed here came in smaller updates unrelated to major new versions or anything like that. There are some related things of course, but there are different aspects of it that are under discussion here vs. there.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Addresses Alleged Throttling of iPhones With Degraded Batteries
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
power steering usually goes away when engine stops and if inexperienced drivers aren't used to no power steering, it is a hazard
As I recall, at least partially, that can depend on the charger and if it provides enough of a current that can charge the battery and also power the phone.
[doublepost=1513817079][/doublepost]
That's just one of the hazards. That's kind of what can make abrupt unexpected shutdowns at least somewhat worse in the eyes of at least some compared to let's say somewhat throttled performance that avoids something like that.
With the car, you know way in advance how much fuel you have and so can plan your journey accordingly. If despite knowing your fuel reserves, you still end up in a situation where you run out of fuel in the middle of the road, then that’s really on you.
With the iPhone, there is no way you can know when your phone is going to shut down on its own and preemptively turn on low power mode to prevent this, so it’s something which has to be on 24/7. What Apple is doing here is to have your iPhone intelligently manage its power consumption automatically behind the scenes to avoid a shut down so that you as the user don’t have to concern yourself with nitty gritty details such as this.
The entire point of simplicity isn’t to do more with more, but to do more with less. We use Apple products because we trust Apple to make the right call with regards to decisions like this, and given that Apple was basically stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea, I do honestly feel that they made the better call overall. Both options sucked, and so Apple chose the one which sucked less.
I suppose an argument could be made about how Apple should have been more forthcoming about this, but I can understand why they decided to maintain radio silence. There’s really no way to nuance this without people misinterpreting and taking the news out of context.
So does this mean when they say the newest iPhone is 2.5x faster than the previous gen or 14x faster than the gen before that those figures include a depleted battery and slowed down units for the benchmarks? 
Didn't the original reddit thread mention something about the same behavior with Macbooks as well? Could someone confirm?
we all know this 'feature' is really a stopgap bandaid designed specifically to avoid a battery recall on all iPhone 6, iPhone 6s and now iPhone 7 units.
[doublepost=1513817273][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1513817336][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1513817273][/doublepost]
try it.
[doublepost=1513817336][/doublepost]
yes. apple store geniuses simply plug your phone into their system and if they see that the battery is "fine" (ie. above the expected capacity for its age, even though that capacity is already too low for you), they won't replace the battery for you.
Maybe I am just crazy, but it seems like we have reached the peak of what we can really do with Lithium Ion batteries, maybe it is time we come up with some new battery tech and perhaps one that doesn't use so many natural resources?
There was a point in time where Apple would have seen this and started working on new types of batteries, surely we can do better than this.
There was a point in time where Apple would have seen this and started working on new types of batteries, surely we can do better than this.
So does this mean when they say the newest iPhone is 2.5x faster than the previous gen or 14x faster than the gen before that those figures include a depleted battery and slowed down units for the benchmarks?
I guess they need to change what they say next year at their keynotes or whatever the term is for them. Just have to add the words " up to XX times the performance of last years A11"
Apple's only mistake in my opinion is opting for slowing down an iPhone when its battery fails to output a safe voltage to keep the processor working within operating parameters vs a script popping up warning the owner its battery needed to be replaced to restore original performance.
This thread is evidence however there would have been hell to pay no matter which route they chose.
This thread is evidence however there would have been hell to pay no matter which route they chose.
I cannot believe people are apologizing for apple here. Apple should be sued. These phones are all defective and apple made a patch to cover up their hardware mistake.
Normally battery degradation means your phone charge doesn't last as long, it still runs normally while the battery is charged.
Apples battery is so bad, that as it degrades it not only doesn't hold a charge as long, the phone fails to function as it should. Apple needed a software cover up to hide the fact that if the phone wanted to run as designed it would shut off when the battery wasn't in new condition.
Anyone excusing apple is a blind sheep at this moment.
Normally battery degradation means your phone charge doesn't last as long, it still runs normally while the battery is charged.
Apples battery is so bad, that as it degrades it not only doesn't hold a charge as long, the phone fails to function as it should. Apple needed a software cover up to hide the fact that if the phone wanted to run as designed it would shut off when the battery wasn't in new condition.
Anyone excusing apple is a blind sheep at this moment.
or design it properly, can't keep going thin and raising the CPU requirements without something giving, it's gotta be a fine balance. it appears to me, imo, the balance is currently off and they have to use software to compensate for the design choices...
That is exactly why the battery should be user replaceable, then it is up to the user if they want to replace the battery or not, of course that also means a substantially cheaper replacement.
And don't give me they can't do that and keep it water resistant, there a cameras that are waterproof to 30 meters for 60 minutes that have user changeable batteries and touch screens, so it CAN be done. Now granted the touch part of touch screen won't work under water, but once dry it works just fine.
No apples mistake is designing a phone & battery combo, that when the battery degrades without a coverup, the phone shuts off.
[doublepost=1513817715][/doublepost]
Apple designs phone with a bad battery, user should pay to get a new one.
And maybe they will succeed, we will see how it goes in the next hours/days. Here in Sweden a major (i.e. "non-nerd") news outlet just posted an article titled "Apple confirms: We intentionally slow down iPhones". This narrative feeds into the common perception of planned obsolescence. If that is how people and other mainstream media will perceive this issue, then it might become a big deal.
In that case Apple's method of not bothering the user and quietly handling things in the background can easily come off as dishonesty, and thus more transparency might have been a better choice.
They just get lazy ... and if you don't have AC, you are f'ed/
PS: Not against you, but I find this undocumented behaviour a serious attempt to avoid transparency.
Apple sells millions of units and avoids any replacement claims, because you cannot really proof your case.
Really, there are battery technologies that are promising, such as solid state batteries or asphalt batteries. They aren't quite there yet, but if Apple threw some money into developing them, they would indeed get to a usable point very quickly.
Nope. Apple sold a defective product, covered up the defect with software. The solution should be to have batteries that will run the phone no matter the charge, and fail only like typical batteries do- not hold a charge for as long. Along with having a battery meter that's accurate.
I don't think you understand how batteries work.
No one is complaining about battery degradation. People are upset because Apple is hiding the battery problems by cutting performance in half. No warning. Then not replacing the battery. Even at the customers offer the pay for it.
Loving how the blind fanboys were proven wrong. Now they're trying to justify everything and make this a good thing. Nope. I knew something was up. I rather replace the battery than have degraded performance.
Well, as I said earlier, I am not sure how Apple could have handled this without people reporting it in a negative light anyways.
I guess it all boils down to whether you trust Apple to do the right thing at the end of the day. I (still) do.
I'd recommend a bit of research on how modern phone batteries work.