Could that possibly be because they expect their phone to be slower in low-power mode?But people using Low Power Mode generally don't complain of crippling performance degradation.
Last edited:
Could that possibly be because they expect their phone to be slower in low-power mode?But people using Low Power Mode generally don't complain of crippling performance degradation.
I can definitely feel the effects on my iPhone 6, which runs iOS 11 fairly smoothly at 1400 MHz, and chunkily at 1127 MHz. Apple basically said that we’re going to run your phone on low power mode whether you like it or not.
Given some descriptions of how crippled people's devices seem to be if simple throttling on the level that Low Power Mode does would result in that I'm petty sure we'd see a lot of discussions about it with people saying that Low Powe Mode is often not really worth such noticeable performance degradation.Could that possibly be because they expect their phone to be slower in low-power mode?
A bit less zippy is miles away from the type of things various people are describing in association with this.App switching is slower, app opening is slower, page scrolling is chunkier, swiping-up for Control Center is slower, key buffering is pronounced; everything is a bit less zippy.
I had a similar experience: store #1 refused entirely to replace my battery when it tested at 86% capacity; store #2 finally agreed to replace battery after I spoke to a manager. They were definitely trained to fight the swap, even though I was happily paying for it.Even worse, they trained every single employee to deceive their customers, telling them that their battery tested normally and would not be replaced (even at the custmers’ expense), instead of telling them that battery replacement would result in an as-new device. Meanwhile, they were busy modifying the OS to exaggerate the throttling, so that customers would feel forced to upgrade.
What a bunch of crooks.
Apple never specified a processor clock speed number. They specified so and so many hours of run-time under some specified typical usage conditions. Look on their web site for many examples of this product specification.
So if changing the processor clocking helps an iPhone stay closer to the run-time numbers listed in their product specification after typical Li-ion battery aging, and not shutting down early, Apple might actually be improving their devices performance as measured against their documented specification, not reducing it.
Geekbench numbers posted on MacRumors are most likely not a legally binding product specification. Caveat Emptor.
Similarly, “miles away” can be miles away from anything that is factually 2 or more miles apart.A bit less zippy is miles away from the type of things various people are describing in association with this.
So definitely not the same at all.Similarly, “miles away” can be miles away from anything that is factually 2 or more miles apart.
Depends on your phone. As article explains, for various models it was introduced in an iOS 10 update. And it doesn't just apply to those models automatically, only in cases when the battery can be unstable.I understand this throttling business is partly based on an iOS update. I'm on the last version of iOS 10 for lots of reasons. If this throttling behaviour is introduced in an iOS 11 iteration, add that to my list of reasons not to upgrade.
When my iPhone 6 CPU goes down to 1127 MHz due to this software “fix” (from the max 1400 MHz), plugging in to a charger does nothing, and the phone continues to be underclocked. Why would Apple do this? Why wouldn’t they automatically boost back up to full speed when plugged in? My only guess is that they are trying to mask the performance delta, and “provide a smoother user experience that Apple customers demand from their iphones.” They’re explanation for this software change doesn’t add up; something’s up.
[doublepost=1513833212][/doublepost]
iOS bloat adds more and more processing burden as new versions get released, that is definitely felt on older hardware. Now you can add this intentional performance degradation. I can definitely feel the effects on my iPhone 6, which runs iOS 11 fairly smoothly at 1400 MHz, and chunkily at 1127 MHz. Apple basically said that we’re going to run your phone on low power mode whether you like it or not.
As I recall the phone still mainly runs off the battery even when plugged in while the battery can charge basically.I have to admit I don't understand why the throttling needs to remain in place when iPhones are connected to a charger. Maybe it's a software bug nobody noticed until now? But I imagine Apple has been looking into this already and would have said something today in their statement to calm crazy people down. It's a strange one.
If that’s the case you will forever be living with a slower phone after Apple decides arbitrarily to slow down your phone? When do they do this? 5 charges in? 10 charges in?250 charges in? Batteries of this kind have a discharge curve that is evenly distributed with some variance. What do they consider a break point for them to start their throttling?As I recall the phone still mainly runs off the battery even when plugged in while the battery can charge basically.
How about something like "You should consider a new battery. See here for the instructions on which model to get and how to swap it." The user experience Apple is so proud of is heavily deteriorated by their sealed boxes and proprietary components.Best customer experience: Make you think your phone is too slow so you buy a new one. How about a message on the screen informing the customer that the phone is throttling back to avoid battery failure. "You should consider a new battery from your nearest Apple Store. Would you like to have Siri create an appointment for you?"
I would agree to forever run my iPhones in low-power mode, if I could just see their source code! Oh man, that would be glorious.If that’s the case you will forever be living with a slower phone after Apple decides arbitrarily to slow down your phone? When do they do this? 5 charges in? 10 charges in?250 charges in? Batteries of this kind have a discharge curve that is evenly distributed with some variance. What do they consider a break point for them to start their throttling?
As I recall the phone still mainly runs off the battery even when plugged in while the battery can charge basically.
Companies the size of Apple want to say as little as possible. Liability is a biaatch.I have to admit I don't understand why the throttling needs to remain in place when iPhones are connected to a charger. Maybe it's a software bug nobody noticed until now? But I imagine Apple has been looking into this already and would have said something today in their statement to calm crazy people down. It's a strange one.
How about something like "You should consider a new battery. See here for the instructions on which model to get and how to swap it." The user experience Apple is so proud of is heavily deteriorated by their sealed boxes and proprietary components.
As I recall the phone still mainly runs off the battery even when plugged in while the battery can charge basically.