Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Somehow that seems like an overstatement....

Well I currently get 901 MHz of the almost 2 ghz Apple advertised my iPhone 6s for. It got pretty slow 3-6 months after I got it (sadly no warranty anymore because it’s a replacement due to faulty battery). To me that seems like less than half even...
It really reminds me of the Volkswagen story. They just decrease your fuel efficiency so that it now is as clean as advertised
 
The comments for this story should be good. There is going to be lots of rage for something that actually seems logical. All batteries degrade at some point. So you can't expect hardware that relies on the power from that battery to still function the same.

You don’t expect such degradation 12 months on though, and calling it a “feature” is laughable.

The average user won’t think, “My phone has got slower and laggier I better change the battery to get 50% of my CPU back.”

They’ll think, “My phone has got slower and laggier, I better buy a new phone.”
 
Sooooo....they’re going to slow down my $1000 phone in 11 months?! Are they insane?
Maybe I’m insane if I drop more money on another iPhone. Hmmmmm....

Would be good if its 11 months. For the iPhone 6/6s it’s more around 6-9 months when it starts slowing down
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mal Blackadder
The message would be great, except that you'd wander on down to the Apple store to find the battery is in good "Healthy" status and not below the threshold that they change them out.

The throttling is occurring sooner.
Why would you have to wander on down to the Apple store if you could buy a generic battery and change it for yourself? That's what I meant.

But if the throttling, as you say, is occuring long before the battery depletes does this mean Apple are using crappy batteries in their premium priced phones or do all batteries show the same gradual decline? But then: How do other manufacturers deal with this?
 
I think the user should be notified about the CPU throttling. It isn't a bad idea to slow down the phone in order to preserve battery life, a slower phone is better than a one that shuts down every now and then, but you should be aware of that.
A simple popup like "You battery is too old we're slowing down the phone to preserve it, please consider to replace it" would be nice. Some users may just keep the slow phone, other may go to the AS and have their battery replaced.
 
Why would you have to wander on down to the Apple store if you could buy a generic battery and change it for yourself? That's what I meant.

But if the throttling, as you say, is occuring long before the battery depletes does this mean Apple are using crappy batteries in their premium priced phones or do all batteries show the same gradual decline? But then: How do other manufacturers deal with this?

I think you're misunderstanding the point I was making.

Apple is throttling the CPU while the battery is considered "Healthy" and above 80% so not in need of replacement.

Why would they throttle it if its A-OK?

And why would they make all this hidden?

Most likely so you don't notice a battery-related issue. Instead you get poor performance, but that's just written off as something that happens as the device gets older and iOS updates bog it down (which they do).
 
It really reminds me of the Volkswagen story. They just decrease your fuel efficiency so that it now is as clean as advertised
And we all know how "well" that ended up for VolksWagen. I hope Apple gets hit on its head by this even more.
I'm surprised their answer, to question why are they doing this, wasnt "courage!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: trifid
This is ********. My 6 year old 4S has 45% battery health (top charge 650mah out of 1430mah).

Despite this, the CPU still gets full score on Gerkbench 4 (290 single core, 500 multi core).

If this six year old battery at 45% health can give full cpu performance (with no shutdowns!), why it cannot in the 6, 6s and 7?

My 6 is at 81% battery health and 600mhz limited out of 1400mhz.

It is a manufacturing defect! Apple must replace the batteries with a mass recall!

I hope this goes to Congress.

Added 4S screenshots for proof.
be5b18a7a64e47d0211296f67bb07aff.jpg
375aadc39b609cc6db8471863e31097c.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Altis
I just catched me watching Android phone review. Despite having a iPhone X 256, somehow now it feels bad for having bought it. Gonna think about all my Apple gadgets, and check for alternatives. Maybe I switch sooner than later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: femike and lysingur
I had been considering upgrading from my iPhone 6 to an iPhone 8 or X because my 6 was just so slow. Was constantly waiting for basic iOS things like spotlight search, typing on the keyboard, loading apps. Much more so than when I first got the phone all those years ago.
Having read some of the stories online about this being connected to battery quality/life, I took a gamble and bought a 3rd party battery replacement kit and installed it 5 days ago.
I can quite honestly say that it's like having a new phone. Everything is fast and responsive again.
Saved myself a LOT of money by extending the life of a decent enough phone.

Just wanted to share in case others were debating "new battery" vs "new phone". I didn't believe it till I tried it myself.

Did some before and after benchmarks. There wasn't that much in it (5-10%) in terms of scores, but in terms of real usage, i'd put the percentages much higher. Easily double, and in some cases triple figures. For exanple, loading Fantastical 2 used to take >5 seconds, but now loads in about 2 seconds. Less than half the time is easily >100% improvement.
 
For me the entire process took two hours from calling Apple, to going to the Apple store and getting back to the office. It took the genius 10 minutes to diagnose the issue (whatever it was). Maybe it was lucky for me but I walked away satisfied.

of course, once the repair programme went out, it was very smooth. My point was that it took months for apple to acknowledge a problem with the phones, costing me money, if you fell into the group post apple acknowledging the issue, you are fine. Its just frustrating when apple will not accept a blatant issue for as long as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: namenotfound
If Apple would have sold these iPhones as 800mHz chip phones and I bought it like that ok; however I paid them a lot of money for an almost 2GHz phone. Would you also find it ok if you pay $100/month for your DSL with advertised 50mbits and 100% availability but then the company tells you that they can only give you half of that if you want to keep the 100% availability? Obviously, you wouldn't get a discount because you bought the contract already...

I think you gave Apple a lot of money for an "up to xxx times faster" processor, they usually dont advertise exact specs.

The same goes for Consumer-DSL (at least here in Austria), you pay for "up to xxxMBits download" and there is no guarantee that you will get that top speed consistently.



My 5S currently shuts off when left for a few minutes in the cold (above 0°C, full battery) so it may not slow down but to be honest I would prefer that because I can not turn it back on without connecting it to power. The only thing that Apple did/does wrong for me is not telling the user, I let Apple support run a battery diagnostic and they said my battery is bad and shows over 1000 cycles but I never ever got any message from iOS about that. Thats to "conservative" for me.
 
You don’t expect such degradation 12 months on though, and calling it a “feature” is laughable.

The average user won’t think, “My phone has got slower and laggier I better change the battery to get 50% of my CPU back.”

They’ll think, “My phone has got slower and laggier, I better buy a new phone.”

I was making the same point. Users should be notified about the throttling and decide whether to replace the battery, keep the slow phone or buy a new one.
 
I think the real issue here is the lack of transparency on Apple's behalf. Personally I think the device should alert you when the battery in no longer performing in an optimum way and allow you to chose between full speed with decreased battery life or reduced speed with improved battery life. You would also know when a battery replacement would be of benefit. Either way this doesn't look great on Apple.

Also, due to the cost of the iPhone X I no longer plan to replace my iPhone every year for incremental updated features. Personally I don't want my £1000 device slowed down after just a year when a software update decides its time.

This could have been incorporated into the low power mode that we already have, but instead it came as a stealth update.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.