Pompous and pretentious words describing the magnificence of really crappy products on Apple site. Doesn't put a little doubt regarding other items sold in there? Can't wait to hear Tim Cook telling us how "incredible" these earphones are
Hey look! It's everyone's favorite kind of post to argue about!
is it just me thinking beats is soooo not apple![]()
None will say that Beats is worth it. They all point to other products that give the same performance for less, and a fair amount less, or that for the same price you can get way better product.
I am not an audiophile, and I do think some of the Beats stuff looks good, but there are too many other options to buy stuff like this without doing research.
If your opinion mattered Beats would never have taken off in the first place.i hope apple turns beats around in the future though im sceptical
beats is a pile of steaming ****
they are neither the most good looking ones neither the best sounding ones they are just the most overpriced ones.
only idiots buy beats , people that fall for the moronic advertisement where celebrities are shown wearing beats so they think that when they buy it they are gonna look like a star, ha ha.
or other morons who want to fit in with their moronic friends, hey look everyone has them i have no personality whatsoever i will buy them too!!
all of these people lack a fashion sense a common sense or any other sense as a matter of fact
I never even knew they used the Dr. Beats by Dre is better IMOI'm quite surprised "Beats by Dr. Dre" didn't simply become "Beats". I realize of course Dr. Dre's name sells, but I was still expecting the change.
Because someone likes something you don't?
Headphones, like speakers, are a personal preference. There is no "best", it's what sounds good to you.
However, I will continue to say that Beats are mediocre headphones, marketed brilliantly. They are more of a fashion statement than high-quality headphones. Given some of the music out there, perhaps it doesn't matter.
If your opinion mattered Beats would never have taken off in the first place.
No No No.
I always argue the concept of best, as one persons best is not another persons best.
But when it comes to something visual or audible, then I am happy to say their is most certainly a BEST.
The task of a screen or a speaker is to as accurately as possible replicate the original signal. That "IS" best.
There is no arguing that I like more bass or I like more treble, as their would be in saying I like my images on screen more green or more red.
Liking that is liking an incorrect poorer item.
Likewise, it I was reading a book to you, my task it to perfectly duplicate the original, I don't change some words, and you say, well I think the way you change words is best. It's not best, it's incorrect.
If you wish to use electronics to tone your sound or tone your screen colour, then it's up to you, but you are, by doing that making the sound, or image less accurate and worse, more incorrect that it otherwise should be.
So no. Best, in this instance is the item that most accurately replicates the original signal as that is the fundamental function of this device.
Yes, a rapper who was in NWA and has had 2 very successful solo albums. Made more money producing, also found Eminem and co found 50 cent.Who is Dr Dre?
I'm serious. Is he a rapper or something? I don't understand. No, I haven't been living under a rock. But is he an entertainer or something? If they wanted star power, I would have picked someone with a little more recognizability. Those of us over 40 might have a difficult time recognizing these strange names that mean nothing.
I think that's a very simplistic view. Every good amp available lets you adjust the audio and presets include cinema, rock, classic. If your example was accurate then you would not need any adjustments.
It's like complaining about Hitler.