Fair enough . I may have it wrong.
So what is your point ? How is a cinema amp relevant ?
Since when has a DJ been interested in Proper Audio Quality!![]()
If what the previous poster was saying was true then DJs wouldn't touch the sound they would just press play.
And home cinemas Amps would be just as good at cinema as classic and wouldn't have adjustments on them. As they would just output the incoming signal.
So there isn't a BEST, things may still need adjusting.
Quality home cinema amps do not have adjustments , they have modes. As an expansive home cinema setup is multi purpose , movies , music, gaming, etc
2.5mm stereo plug. . . Oh god why.
The detachable cable is 2.5 on the headphone side, 3.5 on the other, they come with straight and coiled 2.5-to-3.5 cables that are easily sourced from just about anywhere.
If youre not aware, the M50Xs are _spectacular_ headphones, especially for the $169 street price (the previous model [M50] without the detachable is also fantastic at about $109).
Highly regarded in the audio world![]()
Yes they do have different modes, but the poster said sound shouldn't need modifying, they should just replicate the incoming signal. Which as you pointed out they don't do, they have modes to slightly alter the sound.
I think we are on about two different things. You are kind of arguing my point.Actually no. Your suppose to use the right mode for the source.
Your not suppose to watch a movie In music mode for example.
A good amplifier is suppose to replicate the source exactly as it's created. Hence a good home cinema amp should replicate how the movie was played in a cinema. That is what you pay for.
If you watch the movie in other modes, your missing out on how it's intended to be viewed, sure you can, but why??
Understandable based on your previous post.
And hideous as heck. So funny how all of us have no problem paying top dollar for Apple products when there are so many quality and less expensive alternatives. Why...because we all love the Apple logo and how it makes us feel.
Beats has some of that mojo, and even if bass isn't welcomed in your favorite genre of music, it is in the audience Beats it's marketed to. No one is forcing you to buy Beats headphones now that Apple is the parent company.
Oh god why... disgusting
Please kill me now.
That's the strange thing, Apple has the cultural clout already, and it's backed up by very solid products across the board.
Beats may have some of this clout, but there's nothing of any quality backing it up, it's just hype. This acquisition just seems so un-Apple to me.
So ... different owners, same massively overpriced, crappy products?
Still scratching my head over why Apple would bother with acquiring Beats in the first place.
is it just me thinking beats is soooo not apple![]()
Pompous and pretentious words describing the magnificence of really crappy products on Apple site. Doesn't put a little doubt regarding other items sold in there? Can't wait to hear Tim Cook telling us how "incredible" these earphones are
I've seen these recommended on numerous occasions so they are obviously very good. But not very stylish. And if you are planning on wearing them out and about you do need a bit of both.
And hideous as heck. So funny how all of us have no problem paying top dollar for Apple products when there are so many quality and less expensive alternatives. Why...because we all love the Apple logo and how it makes us feel.
Beats has some of that mojo, and even if bass isn't welcomed in your favorite genre of music, it is in the audience Beats it's marketed to. No one is forcing you to buy Beats headphones now that Apple is the parent company.