This article makes it seem like Apple will market the rumored "4S" as simply the "4," and release the new iPhone 5 alongside it.
The "required" monthly plan will cost as much as the phone.![]()
according to 9to5mac "Additionally, the iPhone codename of N94 has appeared in the iOS SDK on numerous occasions."
This article does not mention that![]()
It will still need an "Nxx" number for the 4s replacement. My guess is there is only going to be one phone, the 5. The 4 will go to 8gb, and be sold at 99$. While the 5 will come with 32/64, and have A5/4" screen. Same ram, new os.
It's amazing how people ignore the N94.
If the iPhone 4S and iPhone 5 are both released with the iPhone 4S being the low-end model, why would Apple put the Apple A5 in it? The Apple A5 is noted as being a massive chip making it expensive to produce. The Apple A4 is not a speed demon by today's standards, but I don't see it being a huge impediment for the low-end model. The production supply situation with the Apple A5 would also be tighter than the Apple A4.Apple will release the following.
iPhone 4S (8GB only, A5, camera bump, non-glass back, other cheaper materials): $99 on contract. Will be single design 3G+ multi-carrier handset using new CDMA/GSM Qualcomm chipset allowing single device for all carriers.
iPhone 5 (16, 32 and 64GB, A5, 8MP cam, larger screen, tapered design with similar shape back as has been reported, larger home button supporting gestures.) Battery life will be somewhat similar but possibly improved due to use of A5 processor. Will be single design 3G+ multi-carrier handset using new CDMA/GSM Qualcomm chipset allowing single device for all carriers.
This article makes it seem like Apple will market the rumored "4S" as simply the "4," and release the new iPhone 5 alongside it.
commander.data said:If the iPhone 4S and iPhone 5 are both released with the iPhone 4S being the low-end model, why would Apple put the Apple A5 in it? The Apple A5 is noted as being a massive chip making it expensive to produce. The Apple A4 is not a speed demon by today's standards, but I don't see it being a huge impediment for the low-end model. The production supply situation with the Apple A5 would also be tighter than the Apple A4.Apple will release the following.
iPhone 4S (8GB only, A5, camera bump, non-glass back, other cheaper materials): $99 on contract. Will be single design 3G+ multi-carrier handset using new CDMA/GSM Qualcomm chipset allowing single device for all carriers.
iPhone 5 (16, 32 and 64GB, A5, 8MP cam, larger screen, tapered design with similar shape back as has been reported, larger home button supporting gestures.) Battery life will be somewhat similar but possibly improved due to use of A5 processor. Will be single design 3G+ multi-carrier handset using new CDMA/GSM Qualcomm chipset allowing single device for all carriers.
You may be streaming 1080p files but what's arriving at your HDTV is 720p. Again, the currentTV appears to have the "heavy lifting" part built inside, but a gate at the end down-converts 1080p to 720p before it sends it to your HDTV. You may have an HDTV that is then up-converting it back to 1080p but up-converting 720p to 1080p is not the same as watching native 1080p.
Eye candy or not is eye of the beholder stuff. When connecting the native video from the 1080 HD Camcorder to the HDTV and then comparing it to theTV render of the exact same video, EVERYONE in my household can see the difference. Rather than having to go to that trouble, I'd just love to buy some new hardware from Apple that removes that down-conversion gate.
Just placeholders nothing to see here. "These aren't the droids were looking for"
I think the "wait" you all keep referring to has a lot to do with iOS 5
This year is all about solidifying the iOS experience for Apple.![]()
The major part of testing is the antennae system. With the tapered iPhone 5 having a completely different antennae design than the iPhone 4, putting the electronics inside an iPhone 4 chassis and using the iPhone 4's antennae isn't an effective test. Just using the iPhone 4 as a shell also doesn't work well, because even if not in use, I'd think the iPhone 4's metal band housing would change signal characteristics. Testing the iPhone 4 in an iPhone 3GS shell wasn't as big an issue since the iPhone 3GS was plastic.I have two theories...
#1 - The "N94" is really the teardrop shape design that we have seen all of the cases for, but Apple simply put the iPhone 5 electronics in an iPhone 4 shell (minus the larger screen of course) for testing purposes. Any testing of the new case design was handled with armed guards and satellite jamming radar!.
Yes, Apple has never found it a problem to limit new iOS features to the top-end model when it was the iPhone 4/iPhone 3GS or iPhone 3GS/iPhone 3G. Although I suppose that could change if Apple considers voice-assist a killer feature. Personally I think its a cool feature, but not that practical. The last thing I need is to be in a bus full of people who not only have their music blaring too loud out of their earphones but are also yelling at their phones to give it commands.Very good observation and the A5 processor bump in the 4s is the only thing in question. The thing that would drive the need for A5 is the new Nuance based voice-assist however that may be limited to top model and makes more sense.
I don't understand. Does everyone hate the iPhone 4 design or are you just craving something new? I find the iPhone 4 design pretty nifty myself, I probably wouldn't give it a re-design one year later, if it were me of course.