Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Shipped equal sold and vice versa. This has been discussed to death.

"Shipped equal sold"

So your saying my dictionary is wrong? don't answer that. The point is Samsung said they sold or shipped 89 mil. and don't believe them because i think is just another lie, in case u have been living under a rock Samsung is really popular in cheating, lying, copying and even worst than that
 
I think the big takeaway is that the major determinant of smartphone marketshare is price. In 2-3 years the biggest vendors will be the Huawei, Lenovo, OnePlus, Xiaomi, MicroMax, Karbonn of the world. These vendors are all growing at breakneck pace and they have a lot of untapped growth in their home markets. They sell phones at half the price of Apple, Samsung, LG, Motorola so to most consumers its an obvious choice. Google does the software development for them and they can easily source parts from local vendors so cost of operations can be kept razor thin. If I were setting up a tech company today I wouldn't be stupid enough to set it up in the US or waste money on R&D. Wait for Google, Apple or some startup to come up with a good idea/UI/service/design, see if it catches on, then replicate it for the local market. Its a time tested strategy that works.
 
And a Kia and Lamborghini both get you from Point A to Point B.

Should we lament Lamborghini's market share numbers being so low compared to Kia?

If you are discussing "getting you from Point A to Point B", I'd be betting on the Kia, especially of Point A and Point B are not close together.
 
Bob is having one of those days. Step up to the plate, swing, miss. To his credit, he keeps swinging.;)

Also interesting... is the fact that you're agreeing with Oletros that I'm clueless.

You do realize that he is arguing that phone sales SHOULD NOT be broken down by market segment. Which seems to contradict everything else you're saying.

So... which is it? Should phone sales be broken down by segment or not? Should an $800 be considered in the same market as a $39 phone?
 
Thanks for posting a link to CAR SALES BROKEN DOWN BY SEGMENT.

Sigh... this was exactly my point. Car sales are broken down by segment. Phone sales are not.

So... you're pretty much proving my point here.

(and no, I'm not interested in comparing WHAT GETS REPORTED IN THE MEDIA EVERY SINGLE FREAKING DAY -- to a report hidden behind a paywall. As you have proven, analyses of the car industry broken down by segment aren't hidden behind a paywall)

We should stop. We've gone so far from your original quote I don't think there's a way back. Suffice it say, unless you buy it, you're not getting the analysis of the phone market you want. Neither IDC nor any of the other firms are going to give it to you for free. They consider their market intelligence to be a product for sale. Love the use of capslock, btw.
 
Apple always reports units SOLD, not shipped. I thought this was a pretty well known fact in the industry?

It mostly doesn't make much difference. The only times where it makes a difference is with unproven and failing products (where a company might ship a lot and then get tons of returns), and if companies try to show off what they did in the first days after a release, where a company might get huge numbers by _shipping_ three months worth of sales to their dealers in the first three days. (As proven by Samsung, that's not even necessary; you can just lie about your sales as proven in court).
 
I'm not sure where you are getting that information from. The Galaxy S4 sold extremely poorly... and by all accounts we're going to get the same from the S5. The S3 was their last high end "hit" phone.

The vast majority of Samsung's share comes from their cheapo phones.

Try Google... you'll see.

From all the accounts I have read the Galaxy S4 {while below market expectations} outsold the S3 and S5 has already supposedly outsold both S4 and 5s launch figures.

KOREAN PHONE MAKER Samsung revealed on Wednesday that it has sold 40 million Samsung Galaxy S4 handsets so far, but apparently it isn't satisfied with that.
Samsung CEO JK Shin revealed the sales figures to Korean news website inews24, announcing that the firm has shifted 40 million units of its flagship Android handset in the six months since its global debut.
This means that the firm has sold more Samsung Galaxy S4 smartphones than it had Galaxy S3 handsets by the six month mark, with the firm last year revealing that it shifted 40 million of its flagship handset in seven months.
While this sounds like pretty good news for Samsung, the firm apparently isn't pleased with these numbers so far, with reports claiming that the phone maker hoped to have reached 50 million sales by now. Investors reportedly haven't been pleased with the sales figures either, claiming that Galaxy S4 sales have been "15-20 percent lower" than had been expected. This apparently caused the firm to scale back production of the handset.

Link: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...s4-sales-despite-hitting-40-million-milestone

The Galaxy S3 and Galaxy S4 followed very different sales arcs, despite similar announcement dates. The Galaxy S4 was very fast out the gate and sold an average of 20 million units per quarter in Q2 and Q3. But this quarter sales fell roughly in half, dropping well below the Galaxy S3 monthly sales rate at that point in the device's lifecycle. Still the Galaxy S4 did ship more units during its launch year. By the end of 2012 Samsung had sold roughly 39.9 million Galaxy S3s, by the end of 2013, Samsung had sold roughly 49.0 million Galaxy S4s.

Link: http://www.dailytech.com/Samsung+Se...First+Profit+Drop+in+2+Years/article34196.htm

FIRST DAY Samsung Galaxy S5 sales reportedly doubled those of last year's Galaxy S4, despite previous reports claiming that it was struggling to match up to its predecessor.
ZDNet Korea reported that the Galaxy S5, which we review in the video below, has already sold out in many places, following its launch across 125 countries in 14 April.
According to the report, the Samsung Galaxy S5 is on average outselling the Galaxy S4 1.3 times, adding that in some parts of Europe, including the UK, sales of the Android 4.4 Kitkat handset have been double those of last year's flagship Samsung smartphone.

Link: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...-day-sales-double-those-of-samsungs-galaxy-s4

Galaxy S5 vs. iPhone 5s launch sales: The Galaxy S5 sold better at launch (April 11-13) than the iPhone 5s did on its launch weekend (Sept. 20-22, 2013). The S5 comprised 23% of total phones sold in the U.S., and 18% of total phones sold in Canada, during the period. The iPhone 5s comprised 18% of total phones sold in the U.S. during its launch weekend, and 13% of total phones sold in Canada.

Galaxy S4 sales in 6-month lead-up to Galaxy S5 launch (Oct. 2013 to March 2014): Even with a new model expected in April 2014, the Galaxy S4 saw sales peaks during the 2013 holiday season and in January 2014.

iPhone 5 Sales in 6-Month lead-up to iPhone 5s launch (May 2013 to Oct. 2013): Interestingly, U.S. iPhone 5 sales dropped progressively in the months preceding the iPhone 5s launch. In Canada, on the other hand, sales remained low and flat during the same period.

Galaxy S5 launch weekend sales by region: The Galaxy S5 comprised a whopping 41% of phones sold (April 11-13) in the Southern U.S. region; 30% in the Northeast, 23% in the Midwest, 21% in the West, as well as 18% of phones sold in Canada.

Link: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1404...alaxy-s5-sales-overtake-apple-iphone-5s-stats

That said the Galaxy S model {of the current year} will never {IMO} quite catch up to the iphone flagship of that year except maybe for the quarter it launches in.
 
On Apple site says SOLD!!!! not shipped, where did u get that info? from a Samsung fanboyism site? :apple:

I get my info from Apple, as well as my accounting knowledge. Unfortunately, words can have different meanings in different contexts. Shipped and sold can be used to mean the same thing.
 
Also interesting... is the fact that you're agreeing with Oletros that I'm clueless.

You do realize that he is arguing that phone sales SHOULD NOT be broken down by market segment. Which seems to contradict everything else you're saying.

So... which is it? Should phone sales be broken down by segment or not? Should an $800 be considered in the same market as a $39 phone?

The problem is that breaking the phone market into "smart phones" and "non-smart phones" has been continuously shifting the segment. It's fine to count the number of Ferraris in the "over $100,000 market" just as it's fine to count the number of Ferraris in the "all cars at whatever price market" if you want to judge whether Ferrari is doing better than last year or not. But if you changed the definition of "expensive cars" from "over $200,000" to "over $100,000" to "over $50,000" to "over $20,000" then it would look like Ferrari is massively losing market share, when the reason is just your moving market definition.

That's happening when you look at "smart phone" numbers. Apple's share of "phones over $600" has been growing, and Apple's share of "all phones" has been growing year after year after year.
 
which means that what Apple counts as sold is very different than what Samsung counts as shipped.

Samsung doesn't report shipped or sold. What we see are estimates. IDC estimates the number of smartphones that are shipped. Gartner estimates the number that are sold to end users.
 
From all the accounts I have read the Galaxy S4 {while below market expectations} outsold the S3 and S5 has already supposedly outsold both S4 and 5s launch figures.



Link: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...s4-sales-despite-hitting-40-million-milestone



Link: http://www.dailytech.com/Samsung+Se...First+Profit+Drop+in+2+Years/article34196.htm



Link: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer...-day-sales-double-those-of-samsungs-galaxy-s4



Link: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1404...alaxy-s5-sales-overtake-apple-iphone-5s-stats

That said the Galaxy S model {of the current year} will never {IMO} quite catch up to the iphone flagship of that year except maybe for the quarter it launches in.

Good info... with one caveat. Just selling "more" isn't much of an indication of success in a market that was growing as rapidly as the smartphone industry was two years ago.
 
Indeed. The term 'smartphone' market is a joke based on arbitrary distinctions. There will soon be only one 'phone' market and in that market Apple's share is and always has been rising steadily and is now up to 10%.

These reports have been able to suppress this story the last few years by continually moving more and more phones into the 'smartphone' category to make said category grow faster than Apple to make Apple look bad. This includes many Android devices with no data plans. However, within the next year they will run out of dumb phones to reclassify as smartphones and Apple's true growth will become impossible to hide. I'll make some popcorn...

My wife's cheap Nokia phone broke, and she's finding it hard to get a replacement.
 
Because their job is to support their clients. :confused:

Strategy Analytics: "We support our clients with a variety of high-stakes projects, including: new product development and product roadmaps; driving existing products down the cost curve; bundled pricing strategies; infrastructure investment and optimization; new market penetration and market expansion; influencing consumer behavior and buying preferences, and many more short- and long-term initiatives."

Emphasis mine.

Even if this report was from Strategy Analytics, which it's not (IDC), that still doesn't give credence to making Apple look bad or suppressing some supposed story. Influencing consumer behavior and buying preferences doesn't support the assertion of malfeasance leveled by proline.
 
Good info... with one caveat. Just selling "more" isn't much of an indication of success in a market that was growing as rapidly as the smartphone industry was two years ago.

Agreed was just pointing out that the S4 while below expectations but was still {as far as I know} the fastest selling android handset in history.

And I am sure that the S5 will soon take that crown {despite how mediocre an upgrade it is}
 
The problem is that breaking the phone market into "smart phones" and "non-smart phones" has been continuously shifting the segment.

I never suggested this. I suggested exactly what you suggest... and break it down by price point.
 
Also interesting... is the fact that you're agreeing with Oletros that I'm clueless.

You do realize that he is arguing that phone sales SHOULD NOT be broken down by market segment. Which seems to contradict everything else you're saying.

So... which is it? Should phone sales be broken down by segment or not? Should an $800 be considered in the same market as a $39 phone?

No my comment was about your sold vs shipped mistake. That myth has been thoroughly debunked.
 
Just think where Apple would be if they listened to customers 3-4 years ago.

Once the bigger phone hits these numbers will look much better.

Same for touch screen computers. Not everyone uses or likes touch but it is a check box that people look for. The current Apple line up looks so far behind without it.
 
And Honda sells more cars than Audi.

The point here is?

(I'll tell you what the point is... the industry needs to stop treating this as one giant monolithic market. It doesn't work that way in other industries... why does it work that way in the phone business)?

Apple's profits in the phone business are rising. Samsung's profits in the phone business got CUT IN HALF over the past year.

Yet the problem is... Apple's market share?

Phone makers are unlike car makers in every way since their top of the line phones are all the same price. :rolleyes:
 
Same for touch screen computers. Not everyone uses or likes touch but it is a check box that people look for. The current Apple line up looks so far behind without it.

Really? Why do people want to touch their computer screen? Personally, of all the things I wish Apple would incorporate in their laptops touch screen never occurred to me. Taking my hands off the keyboard would just slow me down.
 
Agreed was just pointing out that the S4 while below expectations but was still {as far as I know} the fastest selling android handset in history.

And I am sure that the S5 will soon take that crown {despite how mediocre an upgrade it is}

Maybe the S5 will catch up by units. But I've seen a ton of specials for it in the US at launch. I think free on contract and also buy one get one free deals. Judging by that they won't make as much money.

A good friend of mine has downgraded to the S2. He actually likes it quite a bit. And he had the S3, but the battery life was terrible on it. Literally just a few hours of use killed it.

----------

Really? Why do people want to touch their computer screen? Personally, of all the things I wish Apple would incorporate in their laptops touch screen never occurred to me. Taking my hands off the keyboard would just slow me down.

Agreed. Lots of folks in my office have touch screen. I did recently, for the first time, see someone use it to zoom into floor plan diagram. It was awkward, but it was used. We've had touch screens for over a year. They are a waste of time.
 
Some people may not realize that despite all the hoopla about iPhone its worldwide smartphone market share peaked at pretty low level - about 20% a few years back. It's been declining slowly since 2010.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.