It's all those low-end Samsung, LGs and HTCs where their users barely know that their phones are smartphones or buy any apps. Maybe you have to go to cities lower on the economic totem pole to see more of them.
Mmmm, numbers.
Get me some more numbers to look at! It proves my smartphone decision was a wise one.
You like to go around ripping on people, but what exactly do you do?
What's amazing here is that Motorola, and LG's share actually decreased while Android overall increased. Samsung must be doing quite well!![]()
I like you a lot.
Well, the growth for both continues. I wonder how long until Windows Phone 7 starts growing. I think it is bound to happen eventually.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
I don't understand how Android has a smartphone share of 47%, while Apple only had 29%. I have only seen 3 Android smartphones, 5 RIM smartphones, and 1 Microsoft Smartphone in the past year, but countless iPhones. Maybe Massachussetts is mostly iPhone users, because I don't see these results reflected in the real world.
I wonder how long until Windows Phone 7 starts growing. I think it is bound to happen eventually.
Genuinely curious - why do you think that? I don't see them doing anything that would dislodge iOS and Android.
Genuinely curious - why do you think that? I don't see them doing anything that would dislodge iOS and Android.
Genuinely curious - why do you think that? I don't see them doing anything that would dislodge iOS and Android.
It did how exactly ? I don't see 3 quarters worth of numbers to compare the growth rate.
Conversly, who could ever have predicted the likes of Apple or Google dislodging veteran mobile players like RIM, Microsoft, and Nokia from their top statuses?
Anything can happen.
Conversly, who could ever have predicted the likes of Apple or Google dislodging veteran mobile players like RIM, Microsoft, and Nokia from their top statuses?
Anything can happen.
I don't think its a one to one comparison.
iOS and Android were not just phones, they were totally new devices and concepts.
MS did not have a product that even remotely competed until W7M. BB still doesn't. BB is still a phone with crappy email and browser which is pretty much what any "smart" phone was back in the day until iOS and Android.
I agree. Windows mobile 7+ is the most unique looking mobile OS now. Non-conformists and those looking for the 'least controversial' smartphone will find the Windows phones irresistible, especially at lower prices.
I wonder if those numbers include November since the 4S was released in October 14th. Probably. Customer retention is very high for Apple, so it makes sense that users were upgrading.
Even if Apple's market share becomes stagnant and their 97% approval rating gives them 97% retention, I'm pretty sure they'll find a way to pay the bills even if Android takes over all of Windows Phone and RIM's market share.
Edit: I mean include November or simply end when November starts. Again, I assume it does end at the end of November.
Some friends of mine just bought $1 HTC Titans on Black Friday for the following reasons:
> He's a game programmer for XBox
> They were ONE DOLLAR. COME ON!
> Avoid all iPhone and Android controversy
> Better camera than their iPhone 3G
> Flippy tiles are hipster
Not
> Marketshare
> Open Source / Closed Source
> Processor / RAM / Sunspider / GL Bench
They agree that it has these disadvantages:
> Lack of Apps
> Possible overkill on screen size
> Battery Life
Honestly, I really think there is a small percentage of people will pick Microsoft just to avoid Android and iOS entirely or just to be non-conformist.
There are plenty of Zombie Androids (people who own Android, without actually using them as smart phones) out there who have or want an iPad.
iOS and the iPhone were new concepts. Android, nor any of the devices it resides in, is not. Don't forget that the iPhone was the first of it's kind to enter the market, introduce multi-touch, and an app market. Google came second and followed in Apple's footsteps. Yet Google now holds the largest market share of mobile phone OS. What's not to say Microsoft can't do what Google did and capture some market share?
I agree. Windows mobile 7+ is the most unique looking mobile OS now. Non-conformists and those looking for the 'least controversial' smartphone will find the Windows phones irresistible, especially at lower prices.
App markets existed before iPhone. For example, SE had an "Application Store" back in 2003.
I wonder when these non-conformists (who, apparently, think Microsoft and Windows = non-conformism) will start buying them. They've had over a year now. I get that WP7 is "different", but is only seems to be different for the sake of being different. The OS itself, quite frankly, is just awful.
----------
Absolutely no comparison to what we have today. It's as if App stores for mobile never existed prior to 2008. Same thing with tablets prior to 2010. That's how stark the contrast is from what was, to what is.
If Nokia delivers according to rumors and shows up a 900 device based on the N9/800 with better specs, that could be it for me. Until then... i stay away from it all :- )