Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 8 had fb integration. How’d that work out? iOS 20 will remove it again. :rolleyes:
 
Will probably work as ChatGPT on iOS 18 will work. You'll have to give consent every time its used.
 
This all sucks. Why was Apple so behind on all of this AI stuff? Was it the electric car fiasco? Why are they having to desperately try and "partner" with all these other (frankly, crappy) companies in order to play catch up?

Siri was semi-revolutionary at first. And then Apple just… slept.

After using ChatGPT voice chat, it's easy to see how amazing an AI Siri could be, especially if allowed to safely interact in the ecosystem. Everything from the basics like playing content (which Siri currently can't even handle well), to stuff like setting up automations or troubleshooting OS or even account issues. It's easy to imagine a lot of daily, high order benefit to consumers.

But Elon is right: anything non-Apple at the core OS level is completely unacceptable.
 
This would have been an absolutely DREADFUL move if Apple really wanted to keep their image of "Privacy First". Facebook might be the worst possible partner they could work with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lone Deranger
Meta has released their models as open source. I rather run those on device than sending the data to openAI, google or Microsoft. I don’t use any Meta Apps but their AI has been rather more open and transparent than others. I am all for device inference for my personal data. I hope Apple moves most if not all of the AI on device. It should be an exception to send data to servers.
 
No one is forced to do anything, agreed.

However, I wonder if AI was much further ahead instead of chasing the pack, would Apple be positioning it like a search engine or even giving people an option?

Did they take this strategy because they had to, or because they fundamentally believe in giving choices. The later is not a very Apple trait.
I think it’s because they see that the large AI models are fundamentally different than their own.

That is to say, Apple’s approach is AI features to their existing software that is *personal* to you (and therefore useful to *regular* people).

Apple made AI personal to your life, not the next era of internet search. I can’t see that as “behind” anyone else, it’s a fundamentally different approach. If anything you’re going to see the Microsoft’s and Meta’s of the world struggle to head more in Apple’s direction than vice versa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
Hum, nope.
First their AI technology sucks, and then their policy regarding their users' data sucks.

Apple can convince me they're securing our data with OpenAI, but they'll never convince me they can do it with Meta.

Agree. Evil finds a way.
 
Meta has released their models as open source. I rather run those on device than sending the data to openAI, google or Microsoft. I don’t use any Meta Apps but their AI has been rather more open and transparent than others. I am all for device inference for my personal data. I hope Apple moves most if not all of the AI on device. It should be an exception to send data to servers.
In my reading of the tea leaves, Apples long term approach is to whittle external AI usage to highly specialized cases only over time. The use case for normal people (Apple’s entire business model) is already almost complete covered, and will only expand over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechnoMonk
In my reading of the tea leaves, Apples long term approach is to whittle external AI usage to highly specialized cases only over time. The use case for normal people (Apple’s entire business model) is already almost complete covered, and will only expand over time.
I agree, it is my expectation too. Just waiting for Apple intelligence to go live, so I can test it out on what runs on device and what goes to the servers. In any case, I hope Apple supports open source on device models.
 
You have to wonder about the motivation to push AI so heavily. On the one hand, it certainly can, in some circumstances, solve problems that are traditionally very difficult to solve with a heuristic approach. But part of me is mindful of the fact that with most AI implementations, data is going to a server. And that raises all kinds of questions about privacy. And I wonder... is that a motivation? Access to huge amounts of data from users that were previously not available.

Colour me paranoid?
 
As shall I.... and hope it will go the way of Ping and be removed from the OS several versions later.
This isn’t going away. Apple models are integrated in to OS. Ping was gimmick on iTunes. Are you seriously comparing an OS to ping. lol.
 
You have to wonder about the motivation to push AI so heavily. On the one hand, it certainly can, in some circumstances, solve problems that are traditionally very difficult to solve with a heuristic approach. But part of me is mindful of the fact that with most AI implementations, data is going to a server. And that raises all kinds of questions about privacy. And I wonder... is that a motivation? Access to huge amounts of data from users that were previously not available.

Colour me paranoid?
Depends on the use case. Apple says, any device data will be inferred locally. I don’t care if Siri replaces you want to search web with a response from OpenAI or others. Apple has spent lot of time building these on device 3.5 bit quantized models/adapters that have access to local data. I would love to have on device AI that can summarize, emails, write some email drafts and take care of usual stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NT1440
This isn’t going away. Apple models are integrated in to OS. Ping was gimmick on iTunes. Are you seriously comparing an OS to ping. lol.
I think after the bubble bursts, several versions of AI integration will absolutely go away as smaller companies will disappear or be acquired.

We’re in early days of external AI integration in iOS, expect there to be numerous options in the coming year. Then expect many of those to eventually go dormant and removed as companies go bankrupt or get acquired and folded into the offerings from Meta or Google.

OpenAI, as now clearly an intelligence agency cutout, will not be going away but Apple is going to protect users from them as best as they can (the whole point of PCC).
 
I think after the bubble bursts, several versions of AI integration will absolutely go away as smaller companies will disappear or be acquired.

We’re in early days of external AI integration in iOS, expect there to be numerous options in the coming year. Then expect many of those to eventually go dormant and removed as companies go bankrupt or get acquired and folded into the offerings from Meta or Google.

OpenAI, as now clearly an intelligence agency cutout, will not be going away but Apple is going to protect users from them as best as they can (the whole point of PCC).
IMO OpenAI is yahoo and AOL of early internet dotcom era. The Google of AI will have a newer approach and take others to the cleaners. Transformers more or less have hit limitations with token predictions and the over all approach. However, just like dotcom era bubble will burst, and AI isn’t going away. Too late to put it back in the bottle.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.