MacKenzie999 said:I guess that's due to the demand portion of supply + demand.
i guess it's due to human greed... it's sickening
MacKenzie999 said:I guess that's due to the demand portion of supply + demand.
jelloshotsrule said:...to all those saying that the kids are better off with the jobs.... who cares? that doesn't mean that we shouldn't work to improve them further...
This is so vague as to be meaningless.Daschund said:but people don't think about the fact that this child most of the time is bringing more money (proportionally to the country standards) than any teenager here in the US working at the local McDonalds.
Really? What did these people do before Nike blessed them with "jobs"?Daschund said:Take that away from them and they will starve and die.
jsw said:But I don't see anything wrong with working to improve conditions.
jelloshotsrule said:i guess it's due to human greed... it's sickening
bar italia said:I'm heartened to learn that you wouldn't stand in the way of improving their conditions. You're quite a guy!
jsw said:Wow. Now I feel personally responsible for torturing and killing people because I buy Nike shoes. Not.
You see, I don't disagree with Nike. You do. You think changing Nike will change the world. And yet, your sole means of showing this disagreement seems to be to boycott Nike. Instead, why don't you go to help the people in the sweatshops? Send them money, buy them food, whatever. Stop sitting in front of your computer discussing how unfair the real world is.
However, I support any move by Apple which might increase sales of Apple products. It's smart marketing. And I seriously doubt that there will be any large-scale backlash because you can choose Nike shoe colors in an Apple Store.
jsw said:One man's "greed" is another's "ambition". Without greed/ambition, we'd still be living in caves. Greed/ambition drives innovation, drives the economy, and improves lives through better product quality and choice.
Unchecked greed without empathy is, of course, bad. But I still don't count Nike selling shoes for $129 as proof the Devil walks among us.
Do you negotiate for the lowest possible wage from your employer, the minimum amount you can accept to survive? Doubtful, given that you can email. Some greed is good. Calling it "greed" brands it as bad, when it isn't necessarily so.
bar italia said:Do you know what "greed" means? It is by definition a negative term.
"An excessive desire to acquire or possess more than what one needs or deserves, especially with respect to material wealth: Many... attach to competition the stigma of selfish greed.
I suppose it's easier to base your personal beliefs on "Wall Street" than open a ***** book.
billyboy said:Those of you saying boycott Nike etc to help poor people in the Third World are also terribly naive. Again it is not a nice fair world out there, but the kids I have met in my involvements with development work would be far better off working for peanuts making you nice trainers rather than sniffing petrol before walking the streets prostituting themselves. Write to Nike and get your friends to write to Nike and shout at them and make them really uncomfortable and shame them into changing whatever it is they do that you dont like. Or better still, make a big difference yourselves and send your spare cash to projects in towns in the Third World that are promoting self help enterprise schemes. Or get off your ass and take a skill abroad and offer it for nothing for a year. It might even make your CV shine and in the long run you can reap the rewards of learning the hard way about the real world outside your comfy back yards.
Time to put on my Nike trainers and jog off for a big mac
jsw said:My point was simply that calling something "greed" gives it a negative connotation, even though it might not, in fact, be negative.
And thank you for the assertion that my vocabulary comes from Michael Douglas movies.
gelbin said:it is not simply about a low wage, in fact, it has very llittle to do withthat. and likewise, little, if anything, to do with outsourcing jobs.
it has to do with torture and murder of employees for trying to organize labor. something recognized as a fundamental human right. ...
gelbin said:my 'sole means,' come on man, you don't know me from any of the other geeks on this ridiculous board.
gelbin said:how do you know what i am doing to help stop the abuse of sweatshops?
gelbin said:send them money - great, so it is a sink, a constant need and a constant dollar from me.
gelbin said:rather than from the overpaid executives of nike, or how about tiger woods or mia hamm or one of the other over paid athletes getting millions for endorsements.
gelbin said:i will do what i can, and i will tackle the sweatshop issue in ways that I feel i can to make a true difference, including, but not limited to, your bandaid suggestions.
gelbin said:stop sitting in front of your computer - ha ha ha....ha ha ha. i laugh at you again. i am at work, taking a break from what i was doing...
jelloshotsrule said:so you can't be bothered with the conditions that your shoes are made in... why did you support going to iraq?
to all those saying that the kids are better off with the jobs.... who cares? that doesn't mean that we shouldn't work to improve them further... yes, i'm better off making 10 cents an hour than not getting anything, but should i settle for that when i'm being kicked and beaten (physically, and emotionally) along the way?
Wonder Boy said:i like to think we're in iraq so it can be safe for me to go on a plane again, not to get fancy discounts
Wonder Boy said:i like to think we're in iraq so it can be safe for me to go on a plane again, not to get fancy discounts
gelbin said:i don't know you. as you don't know me. but i know what you said. and i attacked that. you, on the other hand, attacked beyond what i said, implying or assuming that i was not fighting for anything, not doing anything to improve the world, not working to end sweatshops (other than a 'boycott' of nike or banter on macrumors).
jsw said:In all fairness, man, you said:
"sweatshops sicken me...jsw, and the likes of you who claim that wanting to avoid sweatshops is about ignorance, you sicken me too."
That's pretty direct. Not "your opinions sicken me" - "you sicken me". hence my reaction. Not defending it. Just trying to explain it. I was put out by it.
gelbin said:safer AFTER we took unilateral action?! ha ha ha. man...now that even our friends hate us, i feel so much safer.