And Apple doesn’t have a monopoly on Smartphones or even AI assistants. No anti-trust there either.Tesla does not have a monopoly in car manufacturing or even EV car manufacturing. It cannot be found guilty of anti trust.
And Apple doesn’t have a monopoly on Smartphones or even AI assistants. No anti-trust there either.Tesla does not have a monopoly in car manufacturing or even EV car manufacturing. It cannot be found guilty of anti trust.
If I want to use apple intelligence, yes I have to use chatGPT. Thats the whole point of my post and the whole point of the lawsuit. Don’t be obtuse
Being locked into a compeitors AI is an anti-trust problem
Yup. Similar to Perplexity. About the lawsuit: I don’t get why companies wouldn’t be allowed to choose a business partner to their liking. Why would they even need to consider another company, especially one with a hostile CEO?AI should be like search engines in Safari. You can leave it default (Google) or choose a different service.
I think a part of the argument here is that Apple literally specifies only ChatGPT:No you don't. You'll mainly be using the on-device small LLM and then occasionally the private cloud LLM. There's very little ChatGPT integration into Apple Intelligence, it basically only ever gets invoked when you ask Siri to use it - but you can very easily integrate ANY of the LLM models with Siri.
AI should be like search engines in Safari. You can leave it default (Google) or choose a different service.
Sounds like socialism and overregulation to me. Your Google example is not really on point, as it was not about Apple having to choose the best browser. It was about Google paying Apple to shut out other search engines. Apple was not the one being sued, it was Google. If Apple had chosen Google without being paid for it, it would have been a different case altogether.What many companies fail to understand is that they can no longer chose a partner based on how much they pay because in doing so it could breach anticompetitive laws. Companies are to put out to tender their business and pick the company that is the best one for the job, not the one who can pay the most. This is why Apple got investigate for their partnership with Google over it's web browser because Apple did not pick the company that provided the best web browser, they picked the one that could pay Apple the most money. This is anticompetitive behavior and courts will put a stop to it.
I never ask Siri to use ChatGPT, it just does, basically always.No you don't. You'll mainly be using the on-device small LLM and then occasionally the private cloud LLM. There's very little ChatGPT integration into Apple Intelligence, it basically only ever gets invoked when you ask Siri to use it - but you can very easily integrate ANY of the LLM models with Siri.
ChatGPT isn’t for coding, it’s for chat. It’s right there in the name. Code specific models exist and are superior to both. Try the GitHub one, it’s excellent.Its coding AI is above and beyond chatGPT
So you only think it's function when big tech chooses partners and never about money? I can kind of get his point - if they have been forced to make search engines swap'able why not this? AI is pretty much a search engine for many people nowIf Grok was superior in nearly every regard, then Musk wouldn't need to go to court to try to force people to use it!
What’s wrong with that? What if my principal is “I don’t support people like musk and you damn well know why!?”I'm pointing out the contradiction of those who would change their stance based on how they feel about certain people rather than basing it out of principle
I never ask Siri to use ChatGPT, it just does, basically always.
Expect for when I ask about Apple or an Apple product. Then it shows me it’s usual „Here’s what I found on the web“ response.
I think a part of the argument here is that Apple literally specifies only ChatGPT:
View attachment 2579376
Because ChatGPT is an option. It's off by default when Apple Intelligence is on.How am I not forced to use ChatGPT if I want to use apple intelligence? Why are you being difficult.
"Why can I only use Grok on Twitter" as well. "They could just make an API"!Now apply this ridiculous logic to Tesla and locking you into using their infotainment system and preventing you from using CarPlay or Android Auto.
Musk is not talking about the app, he is talking about how chatgp is integrated into Siri whereas other AI's are not meaning the user should be given a choice as to which AI the want to be integrated into Siri, not have Apple decide it for them. Just like how Explorer web browser used to be integrated into Windows and every other browser had to be a individual install that worked independently of windows until the courts forced Microsoft to change how it did things.Sounds like socialism and overregulation to me. Your Google example is not really on point, as it was not about Apple having to choose the best browser. It was about Google paying Apple to shut out other search engines. Apple was not the one being sued, it was Google. If Apple had chosen Google without being paid for it, it would have been a different case altogether.
Apple has been very open about wanting to have options for AI engines for their customers. They are looking at good deals with other companies, that also support their preferred privacy driven solution. This is normal business practice. Mr. Musk is whining about the Grok app, and that is total nonsense. If I want to install Grok I can, period. Nothing nefarious going on there.
Also, why would Apple want to deal with a fickle and hostile CEO?
it does. It shares the monopoly with Google’s android. That’s the sole reason why they are subject to anti trust lawsAnd Apple doesn’t have a monopoly on Smartphones or even AI assistants. No anti-trust there either.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!The richest man in the world, ladies and gentleman. But nothing is ever enough. 😔
This toddler needs to take a long walk off a short pier, so we never have to hear from him again.
Are you advocating for murder?Won’t someone rid us of this turbulent boer
Oddly
it does. It shares the monopoly with Google’s android. That’s the sole reason why they are subject to anti trust laws
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!