And Apple's tech relies on Samsung.
Don't forget Samsung's price fixing that Apple benefitted from as well as Samsung's hand in allowing them to create a monopoly of NAND memory where competitors we're squeezed out of buying NAND.
Don't be one sided.
Yeah, nice phone. But if you were a heavy user you were looking at 6 hours battery life once your battery lost a bit of its umph.
Reviews are that even the S6 still can't make it through a heavy use day. Pathetic for a phone that size with a battery that big.
Rather than saying that Apple trounced, I mean absolutely trounced Samsung in the profit department, and saying that Apple beat Samsung handily in revenue, they spin it by counting the number of phones, no matter what the price.
we need more players in this game to step up and even out the field.
we all 'win' when we have more competition pushing eachother, not just 2 companies
we need more players in this game to step up and even out the field.
we all 'win' when we have more competition pushing eachother, not just 2 companies
Actually Samsung's innovation largely depends on Apple's innovation.![]()
Reviews promised me amazing battery life, which turned out to be 12 hours max unless I switch off 3G and hardly ever use the screen. What's the point in having a device with great features if you can't use it because battery dies? I had to charge it twice a day. (And I'm not a power user.) The first one just died on me, I put it by the bed when I went to sleep and it failed to ring the alarm in the morning, making me oversleep for an important appointment, and then I found out that "backup" only backs up SOME contacts and that's about it. Both my Galaxy S IIIs scratched from just being in a pocket. Not with keys or coins. Just in a pocket. I never managed to make the music play without randomly stopping or skipping, I ended up buying Poweramp and setting all buffers to max and priority to highest, and it STILL would occasionally take breaks in the middle of the song. Micro SD would unmount randomly until I stuck a piece of paper in the slot. Etc. I could go on. It was worse than a Sony Ericsson phone I had that required special headphones to work, and that's an achievement.Your horrible experience with them was the Galaxy S III? One of their better devices?
I would love Sony Xperia to succeed. I have a Z3 Compact and it's everything that Samsung wasn't. Perfect size, incredible battery, great camera, music actually plays, fab screen, etc. The only reason I didn't go back to iPhone was the calendar widget constantly present on the screen, I used an iPhone for a few weeks and found I keep on missing appointments because I forget to click on Calendar. If one day Apple get proper on-screen widgets rather than just Notification Centre I might go back to an iPhone. I don't know why Xperia isn't more successful, it really should be.So because you didn't like one of their handsets you want the only firm who can challenge Apple to keep on their toes with innovation to go under. Mmm.. Interesting mind set..
It's really a 2 horse race. Why not talk about the 2 horses involved? The article itself clearly says Apple trails Samsung in sales, and also that Apple had a HUGE gain from last year (35-47 million), while Samsung is pretty flat. It's biased to say that one or the other should be the headline.
This doesn't look like a 2 horse race to me. Huawei sold nearly as many phones this quarter as Apple sold in the year ago quarter - if Apple doesn't grow next year and Huawei has a similar growth, they could overtake Apple. It wouldn't be a 2 horse race if it wasn't conceivable that a third horse could overtake one of the other two. Dismissing Huawei in mobile phones would be like dismissing Apple in laptops.
Huawei's the one doing it right. Shipment volume up 48.1%Samsung's shipment volume dropped 2.3% year-to-year, while apples went up 34.9%. Looks like Apple is the one doing it right.
Sony, Microsoft, HTC,....What companies are in the "other" category? That's a huge percentage for other. I know LG is probably in there, and Blackberry (lol), but that's a lot of also-rans to make up almost half the market.
Plus we don't really know how many of Samsung's "shipments" turned into actual sales.
45% others!
Who are all these other smartphone makers? Are they all Chinese brands?
Actually - there are several ways Samsung has been innovating outside of Apple. For one, I would pit the Samsung GS5 or 6 camera against the iPhone. Their features and quality are damn good.
"In spite of Samsung reporting lower-than-expected results, its shares rose 2.1% in Tuesday’s trading session, outperforming the broader markets that were down by 0.3%."Samsung market share is still above Apple - so Apple is doomed.
Wait a second - Galaxy 6 just issued a profit warning:
http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/180958/korea-etfs-in-focus-on-samsung-profit-warning
Samsung's shipment volume dropped 2.3% year-to-year, while apples went up 34.9%. Looks like Apple is the one doing it right.