Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
On somebody else’s dime. Competition by government regulation as I’ve said repeatedly…..

Meaning what? When a company has a dominant position in a market and is determined to be "unlawfully" restricting competition in that market, they may end up not be able to charge as much or make as much profit now that new competition is allowed to enter that market? That's the way it should be if the company shouldn't have been making (or benefiting in some way) as much as they were to begin with due to the "unlawful" competition restrictions they imposed in the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
There was no iOS app access competition or choice but now there can be thanks to the ability to sideload or use alternative app stores.
For actual competition and choice you need at least 3 players. This is no competition or choice. You are still in the bubble in eu and outside eu. You’ve got some ketchup on your fries but you are still in prison so who cares.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
sounds like a massive fail for the user experience

"hey you want our app?"

"yeah but I don't see it on the App Store"

"nah you gotta go to the website and download because we want more money"

"terrible"

"oh and type it correctly or else you might go to a scam site"

this is so stupid
Ever tried to download an app for the Mac that’s not in the AppStore? It’s not that difficult and why aren’t we complaining about this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
We still can’t develop and distribute software to others without Apple’s explicit approval.

It’s an iPhone, not my phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
So you think a malware company can keep their Developer account in good standing for at least two years, and get at least a million installs in the EU on the app store - before launching their malicious app on their website. I don't think you are serious.
See? You are still trapped inside the box. Come outside and you will see the whole picture.

If it's a fake website, they can fool users and steal user information, regardless on how many installs they have in the EU.
And if they get their hands on an Apple Certificate as they have done in the past (did you read the article at the link I posted for you?), they can install malware.

There are a Zillion of other website where malware spreads, users don't know how safe these are:
softonic, cnet, etc. to name some.
 
Meaning what? When a company has a dominant position in a market and is determined to be "unlawfully" restricting competition in that market,
Where was it unlawfully determined? Not to mention apple is one of hundreds of cell phone manufacturers.
they may end up not be able to charge as much or make as much profit now that new competition is allowed to enter that market?
Yes, a slippery slope for all. We shall see how this plays out over time.
That's the way it should be if the company shouldn't have been making (or benefiting in some way) as much as they were to begin with due to the "unlawful" competition restrictions they imposed in the market.
********. In your opinion.
 
We still can’t develop and distribute software to others without Apple’s explicit approval.

It’s an iPhone, not my phone.
When you buy a device, you are not buying the software, you just license it. The software belongs to Apple, meaning the whole environment belongs to them. that's why it's illegal to reverse-engineer their software. Many other companies license their products like this.

And without Xcode, you can't create iPhone apps, anyway. if you were to buy the software, you will need to pay for updates, and pay for Xcode too.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
I like what Apple is doing since day one ... keep an eye on all those apps so you don’t get crappy apps. I don’t really think it is a win win. I truly think that most people are looking forward to save a buck ... I never get it when somebody buys an iphone, but is not willing to buy an app.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Spotify's use of IAP in the App Store was the exception and not the rule. That only happened for two years. The other 13 years involved iOS subscribers using Spotify's web site to pay. So $9.99 with zero commission for Apple was really the standard for Spotify on iOS. It's always been a poor example when it comes to pricing.
“I reject your example because it disproves my argument.”

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
How would users know if the website is legit or not, if it is one of those developer-registed domains? It is very easy to create a copycat website looking like the authorised and offer malware apps?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.