I beg to differEpic didn't have any risk.
I beg to differEpic didn't have any risk.
Even if you don’t need all those features, you’re still using some features like the SDK which Apple spent money to create and update. Thats why developer accounts aren't free.I would not complain paying the price, if my goal was to publish on the App Store. But I don't need all those features.
well then the customer goes like:"great, I love one store where Apple handles the transactions and I can ask for my money back easily"It is actually the other way around.
"nah you gotta go to the Apple store and download because Apple wants more money"
Even if developers wrote Web Applications (which most companies do, see Adobe) they would work on the iPhone if Apple didn't limit them with WebKit. Those Applications work in Chrome for example.context is native apps.
but glad you think app developers should just write web apps if it was all the same which means this whole controversy was pointless. if not, why did you bring that up?
Doesn't matter if the EU thinks it isKnowing how people are it’s not restrictive enough.
Then how is downloading software only through the appstore safer
I’m against government being this involved honestly because this is not 100 percent fostering competition. In the case of search this is further giving google more power for example.Personally, I am in favor of the DMA, since it encourages competition.
EU doesn’t think.Doesn't matter if the EU thinks it is![]()
1. you're the one arguing that asking the user if Adobe can access a folder would suddenly make that problem go away1) So because someone prefers not to read or think and clicks on every "yes" button, it's a problem of althertive sources.
2) Did you forget the classic: You're holding it wrong? Also the "Genius bar" isn't so genius as you may think, they are standard Electronic store sellers following Apple's guidelines.
I never brought up web apps but you used it as an argument in this discussion.would work on the iPhone if Apple didn't limit them with WebKit.
Sure free market at work. If the price isSure, I don't mind paying more if they actually build something better. If not, and if they continue to push out software updates that turn a normally working phone into a space heater, I'll be forced to look elsewhere. At the same time they need to address issues with eyestrain and headaches. There is a point at which even those with inertia will start to move away from the Apple ecosystem. At that point, it's all over for Apple.
Maybe, but Apple has to comply or cop billions in fines. It is a language Apple understand well so all the governments that want Apple to kowtow will talk in that language.EU doesn’t think.
I'm not miserable. I just want my iPhone to be even better!I don't understand if you are so miserable with iOS, why you don't move to Andoird?
or companies would force their users to switch.
see: Epic.
But they should be free and not have artificial limitations. It's not that I could not afford to pay the money. I just think that the basic features to build an app should be accessible to promote experimentation and learning.Even if you don’t need all those features, you’re still using some features like the SDK which Apple spent money to create and update. Thats why developer accounts aren't free.
Fortunately we still have high court and there is still chance at least some reason will prevail.Maybe, but Apple has to comply or cop billions in fines. It is a language Apple understand well so all the governments that want Apple to kowtow will talk in that language.
I don't think people who played Fortnite thought App Store was pretty worthless but here we are.Again, unless you think the App Store is pretty worthless
Epic already risked/left the App Store. Matter of time before others do.
Yeah, share your credit card, billing address, and other personal information with strangers.I can foresee lots of fake websites distributing malware and stealing user information.
True, Mac users are already able to download apps off websites, but these users are mainly adults with at least an inch of brain, able to detect danger.
Phone users range from children to the elderly, a wide range of vulnerable users who may not be able to perceive any danger.
If this is what the EU wants, they are going to be sorry.
apple already knows this and knew it would be pointless. so perhaps those few customers should simply buy android. instead of putting hundreds of lawyers/engineers/PR/executives' time into this.
Well, Apple has to pay the fine and comply first. It will take years before the decision comes. Even if the decision favors Apple, it will be useless by then.Fortunately we still have high court and there is still chance at least some reason will prevail.