And then they'll come out with a $350 version that will sell well. Pretty much following in the footsteps of HomePod.Lmfao, $550. Next year they'll have to lower it at least by $100 like they had to for HomePod.
the button is on the top - so my point is irrelevant I can't delete itLike the AirPods with the long stalk. Gets hung up in shirt collars, sweaters, coats, such a PITA...
550$ wait what? For a headphone? WAIT WHAT !?
I'm curious if it allows direct analog connection through the lightning connector. AFAIK lightning is digital only so you're going to have Analog input----->lightning adapter converts to digital---->AirPods Max. That's less than ideal if listening through cable.Apparently these have a lightning port so you could use a lightning to 3.5mm cable with them.
It looks like a bra.Or something... It looks ridiculous! What protects the mesh 'canopy'? If this were April 1st, I'd call it a joke.
View attachment 1689180
ANYONE who says 'super excited' and 'totally awesome' a lot.Sure if that’s the market Apple is going after. But most likely they’re going to be compared to cheaper options just like the HomePod was. I will be curious to see who gets review units.
Mine says Dec 15-17...Space Gray version.Mine doesn’t deliver until the 22nd? Anyone already experiencing delays?
Yup expensive don’t look at them if u can’t afford
Direct from the App Store app (iOS 14.2.1)Not sure where that graphic came from. It is not what is currently on the Apple marketing page. Doesn't match specs.
"...Up to 20 hours of listening time on a single charge with Active Noise Cancellation or Transparency mode enabled3
..."
![]()
AirPods Max - Technical Specifications
View all technical specifications for AirPods Max.www.apple.com
Prepared to eat my words if it's not the case, but I'd certainly be surprised if these sound as good as anything in their own price range. If they did they'd be $1,000, Apple aren't known for competitive pricing...You do realize there are a *ton* of headphones that cost more, some as much as 10x this much. Just head over to head-fi. $550 is decidedly mid-level.
Sound nerd alert! J/K, but I have no idea what any of that means. I just wouldn't buy them because I see NO value in $550 headphones. I don't work in the music industry, and my ears can't tell a difference.I'm okay with the price tag.
But if and only if it's lossless on Wireless (at least 44khz 16 bit without any lossy compression, as I'll use it with Tidal)
But if for this price tag I get a 256kbps AAC recompression as with the standard airpods, then no, thanks, I wouldn't even buy for $100.