Will Belkin save your day by selling a safety lock to prevent thieves from grabbing these off your head?
LOL so that’s probably 700+ in Canada. What a dumb price from a dumb company. I can’t say I want to support this behaviour anymore. Samsung or Google it is honestly, at least they don’t just make devices for the 0.1%
Not a bra. It's a mansierre.that case though.. is that a bra or something
apple_airpods-max_smart-case-blue_12082020_big.jpg.large_2x.jpg
I wonder if this means high-res Apple Music in inbound?
In France this thing is the same price as the brand new iPad air, more or less.![]()
Yes, that is correct. So, these will operate over USB when connected to, say, a MacBook? That's a plus if the Lightning port isn't just for charging, even if it's still just an AAC experience over a cable. I was hoping the HomePod mini could act that way as well. (I just received a mini, I should test if a MacBook Pro can drive it when wired.)They can be "wired", but I think you're concerned about lack of pure-analog lossless connectivity.
The thing about the AirPod Pro's, and regular AirPod's for that matter, is that they brought something new to the market. Convenience, the battery case, portability were all huge factors for the originals, which is why I was willing to spend, what I thought was a lot, 250 dollars on them. 550 dollars for headphones just cause they're made by apple? when there are a million competitive products already on the market for half the cost? Whats the 'one more thing' with this?
It will be more about status, look at what I can affordThe new Beats. I guarantee you every rapper, basketball player, and TikToker will be wearing them.
Have you never seen high-end headphones? Sony makes $13,000 pairs.550$ wait what? For a headphone? WAIT WHAT !?
Maybe someone should tell Tim Cook there's a global pandemic and people are struggling financially.
Sure they do. They know what mass market consumer products cost, which is exactly what these are.
If Apple Music offered a lossless codec (ALAC) with these headphones over bluetooth 5.0 then it would be worth the money for me. From Apples perspective though, they have no use for lossless/high bitrate connectivity unless they are also supplying the content in that format. So, there's no sense grousing over them not supporting someone else's format until it's native in their Apple Music subscription based service. It's got to happen on the content side as well. They aren't going to create a high bitrate transfer protocol just so we can subscribe to Tidal HD (or some other HD service) and lose AppleMusic subscribers over it.Serious question for audiophiles converting to Digital means though, if you come to find out Apple Music in the next few months will be offering HiFi (like Tidal does) does this change anything for you?
I totally get it the "audiophiles will hate this" as I have a Technics 1200M Record player and pre-amp installed. I just find that digital media is catching up in sound quality and convenience since most albums nowadays are over compressed in production anyways.
Now that would be interesting.Yes, that is correct. So, these will operate over USB when connected to, say, a MacBook? That's a plus if the Lightning port isn't just for charging, even if it's still just an AAC experience over a cable. I was hoping the HomePod mini could act that way as well. (I just received a mini, I should test if a MacBook Pro can drive it when wired.)
I’ve read Sennheiser headphones are superior to these and still cost less and that’s an audiophile brand
$779 to be exact...and you can tack on an extra $79 for AC.LOL so that’s probably 700+ in Canada. What a dumb price from a dumb company. I can’t say I want to support this behaviour anymore. Samsung or Google it is honestly, at least they don’t just make devices for the 0.1%