Can’t help but think the only ones buying these are simply trying to make a statement. $550 is ludicrous for what they actually are vs what’s available on the market from Sony and others for far less.
All of it I would dismiss, if it weren’t for audio sharing.
Having the kids share an iPad for a 10 hour drive is invaluable.
the lightning port is not a surprise but if Apple is shifting away from lightning ports on the phone, why not give us a little extra convenience in usb c? I have tons of those by now. The iPhone lightning is the outlier in my life. Not the standard. I’m not being pulled back in for that.
I’m half a step out of the ecosystem at this point anyway.
LOL back in shape by Easter undoubtedlyApple's own economists probably concluded that the US economy is doing absolutely great! (don't know about Canada, my 2nd favourite country in the Americas)
If the sound is really outstanding, the price is not that much expensive. I have headphones far more expensive than that ( Sennheiser HD800 , 1250 euros,and it's absolutely worth it ). The AP MAx has also surround sound capabilies for movies, and that's extremely rare.
There's nothing to get outraged about here, unlike some other Apple products.
EDIT : I take back what I said. No cable connectivity ! Nope, I won't buy these.
Once again Mr Cook says: Why all these complaints about price, I don’t get it? We make these for the average Apple Music enthusiast.
Maybe we need to add a color Touch Bar, yes they love that on our MBP, that’s a good idea.![]()
I have a pair of planars (not electros) at home that are driven by a desktop amplifier. The problem is, I can't take that on the road. Well, I could, I suppose, if I brought along a portable amp – no thanks – or purchased a pricey lossy digital player with a built-in amp – also no thanks – and buy new closed back cans because open-back sucks for travel for obvious reasons. Stax has its place but on a plane or a train isn't really one of them. Thus sizable market for Bose and Sony ANC headphones that Apple is trying to enter (and successfully so with the AirPod Pros, IMO).I’d rather spend just a little more and get a set of Stax electrostatic headphones...REAL headphones
If they sound like high-end phones then even at $549, the Apple AirPods Max is a bargain.
Top audiophile headphones from Focal, Meze, Audeze, Abyss, Sennheiser, and others cost thousands of dollars.
Naturally, the volume of sales of those are in the ten of thousands and Apple aims to sell millions of their products.
This AirPods Max at 13.6 ounces is a lot heavier than the popular ANC from Sony, the WH-1000XM4 at 8.95 ounces.
As such, not many will be walking around with this heavy rig all day. In the audiophile category, AirPods Max is light with many near a pound or more.
If these headphones beat Sennheiser HD 800 S terms of sound quality they are worth it. There are no wireless headphones that offer accurate mid, bass and treble response.
There's idiots every where.Apple is not run by idiots. They must have inside information into the U.S. economy. I guess they concluded that the U.S. economy is doing great!
These will sell about as well as the HomePod -- especially at that price.
lol. nope.These are ultra-premium headphones priced well below the competition.
Sure, because they made 10 of them. That fact means nothing. There were people who bought the 17K Apple Watch Series 0 too.Delivery times have already slipped well into January. Looks like they are selling OK so far.
SO it sounds like an interesting product - until you see the price point and they DON'T state the frequency response? No one markets headphones without stating the frequency response and other sound specs.
what color did you order?I'm very confident these new AirPods Max will sound spectacular. Confident enough to order already without seeing any reviews. This is a product that has been in development for a long time.