I didn't know Sennheiser only made one pair of headphones.It's a pleasure to listen music with the Sennheiser.
I didn't know Sennheiser only made one pair of headphones.It's a pleasure to listen music with the Sennheiser.
Nope. NVIDIA just said recently that SAMSUNG is not able to keep up with the components needed for enough RTX 30 series stock and it was causing the stock issues.Covid has been around for almost a year. Most giant companies have figured it out. Samsung has no problem getting products out the door for example.
I wouldn't be surprised at all when Bose and Sony fix that with their next gen models.Now Bose 700s and Sony XM4's look cheap by comparison price wise
I used to use Sennheiser HD595 or something along those lines and I loved those headphones. Great sound and comfort.I didn't know Sennheiser only made one pair of headphones.
H95? How is the sound quality, honestly?$250 cheaper than my B&O
how would you know....no one has the max's yet. your just guessing. with zero experience.Get a pair of Grados. Superior sounds and half the price.
It's great ! I too own several of theirs. But it isn't because you like the HD595 that you'd like others from the same company. That's my point : Sennheiser, like a lot of other headphones manufacturers, have made products of varying quality, and the ones of a decent quality may suit better one person or another depending on various factors.I used to use Sennheiser HD595 or something along those lines and I loved those headphones. Great sound and comfort.
Are they headphones that compete with this though? Popular thought here is these compete more with the Bose 700 and Sony XM4People saying ‘$550 for a headphone’ don’t know much about the pricing of headphones in that market. There’s headphones for much much more available.
So you're "okay with the price" AND you use Tidal? There is a lot to parse there... 🤔I'm okay with the price tag.
But if and only if it's lossless on Wireless (at least 44khz 16 bit without any lossy compression, as I'll use it with Tidal)
But if for this price tag I get a 256kbps AAC recompression as with the standard airpods, then no, thanks, I wouldn't even buy for $100.
Absolutely true for me. My "expensive" cans are reserved for desktop and audio system usage and wireless are used exclusively for mobile situations where a cable is more bothersome than not. When on the road, audio quality is compromised anyways thanks to the environment so I'm fine with enjoying a lossy experience, just happy to be able to bring along my music.
When looking at the $549 price, I believe Apple is justifying it with the presence of the H1 chip that, through audio computation, appears to do much more than any ANC hardware found in products like the XM4. I suppose it remains to be seen if audio "tricks" produce enjoyment, un-natural sound and/or fatigue. At double the street price of the XM4, these cans need to produce some magic. The XM4's also have dual device pairing, 30 hour listening time, 5 hours after a 5 minute charge and support both AAC and LDAC; it's really quite the technical marvel at under $300.
I find the lack of a wired option to be the limiting feature for the price. Maybe these could have been both an audiophile and mobile headphone with the inclusion of that option. I don't see any mention of lossless AAC capability but perhaps the hardware is capable of it. The fine print mentions only the use of 256-Kbps AAC encoding for testing. If these can do lossless, and actually sound good via the H1, then suddenly the price is easier to swallow.
I think these are aimed squarely at the same target audience as the B&O H95 - which by the way sound quite lovely.H95? How is the sound quality, honestly?
I think these are aimed squarely at the same target audience as the B&O H95 - which by the way sound quite lovely.
There is a lot of parallels there in terms of industrial design and material use.
The reality is these are not really intended to complete with the mass market XM4 or Bose 700’s, and I’d certainly expect something a little more impressive than the Sony’s or Bose’s mass market sound tuning too.
By the looks of things I’d not say these are overpriced at all in the market they’re intended to compete in.
Indeed, I’ve got a HD800S at home and Sennheisee do products more expensive than that (HD820 - closed) and HE1 (Open). Although, finding a HE1 buyer would be rare.Wow, so many people complaining about the price. That makes me laugh. I would encourage you to go take a peak at Sennheiser, they have many headphones OVER 1000$. Given the materials these are reasonably priced.
But that's not really comparing apples to Apples. I mean, you might as well look at Audeze, Hifiman, Abyss, etc and go over $5K. Wired, fully analog high-end headphones serve an entirely different market than their wireless, noise-cancelling, mobile counterparts. The market movers there are Bose and Sony.Wow, so many people complaining about the price. That makes me laugh. I would encourage you to go take a peak at Sennheiser, they have many headphones OVER 1000$. Given the materials these are reasonably priced.