Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Covid has been around for almost a year. Most giant companies have figured it out. Samsung has no problem getting products out the door for example.
Nope. NVIDIA just said recently that SAMSUNG is not able to keep up with the components needed for enough RTX 30 series stock and it was causing the stock issues.

Grocery stores in my area are still VERY empty.
 
Well, the airpods pro probably cost them $15 in materials. IMO, they are an even bigger rip off.

up next AirPod max pro. $999
 
Apple lovers will obviously buy them regardless of the price because it's an Apple product.

Many people still have good wired headphones for many years.
For everyone else, the ridiculous high price for a pair of headphones is a turn off considering that the headphones will end up in the garbage or recycle bin in a few years because of the batteries. Apple is known as an environmentally friendly company?

You know that people will use it with their iPhones, if not any other products supporting bluetooth, but some people actually do like wired cables, despite what Apple lovers say that it's outdated.
For the price, there are better headphones available for less money.
 
So the cost yikes!!! :oops: :oops: But with apple pay monthly whatever...👌

Concern how to keep clean and or can they be replaced?

Hmmm.. Looks like ill be keeping my Beats Studio 3 for a little longer...
 
Where’s the button to hide all the “too expensive, won’t buy it” posts? Do you people turn up to auctions for homes you think are too expensive, never bid, but tell every person who’ll listen that it’s too expensive and you won’t buy it?

Ok yeah they’re more than you thought they’d be. But 44 pages of “nope too expensive” is ridiculous. Enough is enough.
 
I used to use Sennheiser HD595 or something along those lines and I loved those headphones. Great sound and comfort.
It's great ! I too own several of theirs. But it isn't because you like the HD595 that you'd like others from the same company. That's my point : Sennheiser, like a lot of other headphones manufacturers, have made products of varying quality, and the ones of a decent quality may suit better one person or another depending on various factors.
So comparing these to "Sennheiser" in general makes zero sense.
 
People saying ‘$550 for a headphone’ don’t know much about the pricing of headphones in that market. There’s headphones for much much more available.
Are they headphones that compete with this though? Popular thought here is these compete more with the Bose 700 and Sony XM4
 
I'm okay with the price tag.

But if and only if it's lossless on Wireless (at least 44khz 16 bit without any lossy compression, as I'll use it with Tidal)

But if for this price tag I get a 256kbps AAC recompression as with the standard airpods, then no, thanks, I wouldn't even buy for $100.
So you're "okay with the price" AND you use Tidal? There is a lot to parse there... 🤔
 
Absolutely true for me. My "expensive" cans are reserved for desktop and audio system usage and wireless are used exclusively for mobile situations where a cable is more bothersome than not. When on the road, audio quality is compromised anyways thanks to the environment so I'm fine with enjoying a lossy experience, just happy to be able to bring along my music.

When looking at the $549 price, I believe Apple is justifying it with the presence of the H1 chip that, through audio computation, appears to do much more than any ANC hardware found in products like the XM4. I suppose it remains to be seen if audio "tricks" produce enjoyment, un-natural sound and/or fatigue. At double the street price of the XM4, these cans need to produce some magic. The XM4's also have dual device pairing, 30 hour listening time, 5 hours after a 5 minute charge and support both AAC and LDAC; it's really quite the technical marvel at under $300.

I find the lack of a wired option to be the limiting feature for the price. Maybe these could have been both an audiophile and mobile headphone with the inclusion of that option. I don't see any mention of lossless AAC capability but perhaps the hardware is capable of it. The fine print mentions only the use of 256-Kbps AAC encoding for testing. If these can do lossless, and actually sound good via the H1, then suddenly the price is easier to swallow.

I’m hazarding a guess, as I haven’t bothered to delve too deep into them.... yet.

But I believe they will work wired using Lightning to USB-C, or via the bi-directional Lightning to 3.5mm aux adapter cable.
 
Wow, so many people complaining about the price. That makes me laugh. I would encourage you to go take a peak at Sennheiser, they have many headphones OVER 1000$. Given the materials these are reasonably priced.
 
H95? How is the sound quality, honestly?
I think these are aimed squarely at the same target audience as the B&O H95 - which by the way sound quite lovely.

There is a lot of parallels there in terms of industrial design and material use.

The reality is these are not really intended to complete with the mass market XM4 or Bose 700’s, and I’d certainly expect something a little more impressive than the Sony’s or Bose’s mass market sound tuning too.

By the looks of things I’d not say these are overpriced at all in the market they’re intended to compete in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mescagnus
Nothing I could spend money on without reviews and more info. Yes, for this price, lossless audio is a must. How is Mic quality? Sound Quality must be on par with higher priced options.
 
I think these are aimed squarely at the same target audience as the B&O H95 - which by the way sound quite lovely.

There is a lot of parallels there in terms of industrial design and material use.

The reality is these are not really intended to complete with the mass market XM4 or Bose 700’s, and I’d certainly expect something a little more impressive than the Sony’s or Bose’s mass market sound tuning too.

By the looks of things I’d not say these are overpriced at all in the market they’re intended to compete in.

Also dont the H95s last like 30+ hours ?
 
Wow, so many people complaining about the price. That makes me laugh. I would encourage you to go take a peak at Sennheiser, they have many headphones OVER 1000$. Given the materials these are reasonably priced.
Indeed, I’ve got a HD800S at home and Sennheisee do products more expensive than that (HD820 - closed) and HE1 (Open). Although, finding a HE1 buyer would be rare.
 
If these provided spatial audio or some kind of surround sound with an Apple TV 4K, maybeeee they’d be worth the price. But to just listen to stereo audio with an Apple TV it’s over kill.
 
Wow, so many people complaining about the price. That makes me laugh. I would encourage you to go take a peak at Sennheiser, they have many headphones OVER 1000$. Given the materials these are reasonably priced.
But that's not really comparing apples to Apples. I mean, you might as well look at Audeze, Hifiman, Abyss, etc and go over $5K. Wired, fully analog high-end headphones serve an entirely different market than their wireless, noise-cancelling, mobile counterparts. The market movers there are Bose and Sony.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.