Im not sure why you’d want the heart rate monitor in them but maybe some do. I’d sooner them just make them the best device out there for music.
Desperate for a feature.
Im not sure why you’d want the heart rate monitor in them but maybe some do. I’d sooner them just make them the best device out there for music.
Agree, and its actually, most probably, worse than that, assuming the Airpods Pro have the same limitation as the heart rate monitor-enabled Powerbeats 2.I would venture to guess that most people who use the AirPods Pro also use an Apple Watch. So the heart rate monitor feature is not as useful. I might be wrong but my guess is as far as accessories go, most people would first buy into the Apple Watch and then opt for the AirPods Pro. There are plenty of headphones in the market and work reasonably well that the AirPods Pro is not that unique a device. Not saying that the AirPods Pro are not worth it; just that they are pricy for an ANC headset in 2025. Most people plunking $250 on the AirPods Pro would have already bought into the Apple Watch. So who is the heart rate feature really for? Just seems like a feature that screams ‘just because we could do it’.
The interesting thing about apples tips are they are only foam in the core. The outside is silicon. It reminds me of when I used blu tac on the app1 to dramatically improve ANC by lining the inner side if the silicon. This was measured by a YouTube audio engineer and confirmed that it extended ANC above 1khz (0db.kr)Almost certainly a big part of it (or all of it).
Foam tips totally changed and improved my APP2
The OG silicone ones sit in a drawer.
A good catch and really not acceptable.
This isn't some annual release product and they shouldn't be saying anything about APP1 in a comparsion at this point in time.
That's meant to deceive.
Very disappointing.
Trolling or for real? Can I ask the use case? I like knowing how others see something and think "yeah, thats great"Desperate for a feature.
If your cousin is passing along proprietary information then he is really at risk of losing his job and facing a lawsuit.My cousin works in the engineering team at Apple.
Haha, thought I was in the 17 Pro thread for a second.No black option. So disapointing
On the Powerbeats, which also have the heart rate monitoring, the data transfer defaults to the watch. The watch wins. I assume same will be the case here.I don’t understand the heart rate sensor. Surely anyone seriously working out with AirPods Pro also has an Apple Watch. The amount of people with iPhone AND AirPods Pro and No Apple Watch, who also do serious workouts, had to be vanishingly small. There is no way that specific market is large enough to justify this.
And no explanation of it whatsoever. What happens when you ARE using a workout on Apple Watch at the same time? Which data wins? Are my earbuds going to drain unnecessarily while collecting redundant data?
i very much have an iPhone and AirPods and very much prefer wearing my mechanical watches.I don’t get what the point of the heart rate sensor. If you’ve got an iPhone AND AirPods, what are the chances you don’t have an Apple Watch?!
some small size changes to the charging case + a newer U2 chip for Precision Finding via Find My.I didn't see any mention of changes to the charging case. Is it the same size as the one for the APP2?
I'd be amazed if this is right. AirPods Pro are everywhere--and smartwatch adoption isn't that high.I would venture to guess that most people who use the AirPods Pro also use an Apple Watch.
Thanks for checking this! The reduced runtime is disappointing. It's not a problem for me personally, but it certainly reduces the value of the feature overall.some small size changes to the charging case + a newer U2 chip for Precision Finding via Find My.
The downside to the size changes of the case are that the battery life the case provides diminishes from an extra 30h on the previous model to only 24h.![]()
So then like 90% of people using AirPods Pro 3 will have heartrate sensors discarding data. Nice one Apple. Really good addition.On the Powerbeats, which also have the heart rate monitoring, the data transfer defaults to the watch. The watch wins. I assume same will be the case here.