$349
nope
Seriously? There's 1mb HD watches for sale by android going for the same price and all they do is have different faces of styles...
$349
nope
If a device is 50m resistant, I'd call that waterproof tbh. Most water resistant watches break inside swimming pools. The ones that don't are always called waterproof.
That thing is proof that Apple has totally lost it on design.
where's your market research data that says most people aren't interested in health and fitness tracking? specifically?
And don't forget that the iPhone you must carry with you on your run will now be BIGGER.
DOA.
I think Apple missed the mark this time. iWatch is ugly and tacky. Very unApple.
I was expecting good design. iPhone 6 on the other hand looks good but 16GB of storage standard is a no go for me.
Waiting on the new Nexus but I might settle for a One+
That's my point. It has to be waterproof and with some small pressure resistance. 50m is not a big deal.
That said, water resistant only makes this thing a waste IMO.
I have my Omega on at all times doing all sorts of water activities without even thinking about it.
I hope the the fact is charged the way it is means is waterproof. Also, not sure if you must have an iPhone next to you at all times. That will be a joke, so I can't use this to swim in the ocean.![]()
What do you mean not as customizable? its more customizable that the apple watch. and comes with more watch faces right out of the gate and you can customize the watch faces too.
Moto X destroys the Apple Watch in every way possible.
Design. Material Quality. Simplistic but in interface.
better OS, Functionality and finally Google Now completely destroys it.
I mean look at this then look at apple disgrace of a watch. its night and day.
Image
It's not as revolutionary as the iPhone or iPad, that's for sure - but it looks like the best wearable on the market, though I think that says more about the market than the Apple Watch...
no talk about battery life, huh?
But seriously the UI looks so not like Apple. It didn't seem intuitive, it seemed clunky, it seemed very confusing. Did anyone actually get how we are supposed to use this device from that presentation?
It's as ugly as the new Mac Pro, new OSX Yosemite, and the new iPhone. What's next? An uglified iPad?
If it was waterproof I'm sure they would have mentioned it somewhere. I wouldn't put my hopes up and you need the phone with you for this to work so forget about surfing.
It doesn't look that thick to me. Even sideways, sure you got the calculation right.
Errr, hello, have you not seen the Moto 360, the LG or the curved Samsung. In what possible way does this look like the best wearable on the market??? (and the most expensive to boot!)
I agree. Software-wise this is very messy and far too complex. They needed to keep it much more simple and de-couple it from an iPhone, then they've have a serious product.
Did they say that? I would think that it should be able to capture data independent of the iPhone and deliver it when the iPhone link is restored.
Errr, hello, have you not seen the Moto 360, the LG or the curved Samsung. In what possible way does this look like the best wearable on the market??? (and the most expensive to boot!)