I thought the aWatch presentation was pretty sweet. I'm not a watch guy so won't be getting one but I'm LoLing at all the negative comments.
The one on the left looks nice. I don't know why Ive was saying that they've beaten the Swiss, but it easily bests the competition design-wise except for Motorola.
Also, this is disturbing:
So I need an iPhone in my pocket to use it? And it's $349 by itself? No deal. Please at least tell me that it'll still tell time without an iPhone.
And that's the whole point. A lot of people don't want to have to carry multiple devices around with them. Now they have to, if they want the watch.
One device? Now we need 2 of them. I think Jobs understood it better with his one device speech.
Watches are fashion statements. And to a lot of people, wearing a square watch is the same thing as wearing a headband or leg warmers; it's just too 1980's. My first thought was "reminds me of the calculator watch I wore in third grade."So what are the benefits of a round design?
A square has more area than a circle with an equal diameter.
There are really only two markets for watches: Cheap & Not-Cheap
You're either the kind of person OK with dropping $100+ on a watch, or you aren't (in which case: off to Target you go).
So, yeah -- this watch will be competing in the space occupied by high-end luxury watches (especially the gold models).
You really think we all should wait for 2nd gen like with all devices before this?
Watches are fashion statements. And to a lot of people, wearing a square watch is the same thing as wearing a headband or leg warmers; it's just too 1980's. My first thought was "reminds me of the calculator watch I wore in third grade."
I'll go to the Apple Store and try one on, but right now it just doesn't seem like an inspired design. I expected more from Apple. I'm pretty sure I won't be buying it till version 2 or 3 (if at all), especially not at that price.
Steve would not have added so many SKUs to anything. He understood what a trim and easy to understand product line up is. Apple of today are slowly losing the ability to understand this.
The latest douchebag / nerd comment.
I remember reading that there are troubles making round LED screens.
There were announcements between the countless dropouts of what they call 'live stream?'.
Live streams have always been spotty, so it's not that they didn't know there was work to be done in improving that.
But as with all things 'cloud', they failed miserably. Why should I trust them with anything else cloud-related when they can't get a simple video stream right?
Seems simple but I wish it was round, just would make it a bit more classier. Also gold watches != class, unless you're Chinese or Arab and have no class.
Why?
The only reason that watches are round is that a circle is an ideal choice for displaying time in a standardized way. While the Apple watch of course displays the time, this IMHO is not the primary use case for the device. There are many other important use cases for which a square makes much more sense.
If the primary reason you want to wear something on your wrist is to see the time then I suggest buying a traditional watch...
But the point still stands, whatever the reason, Motorola wasn't able to get a circular screen in their watch.
LOL, have you any idea how deep is 50m?
I doubt Jobs was involved in this. Building a watch probably was on the board when he was alive but remember the design and UI on these things go back to the drawing board many times. So it's not possible this product was something he saw or approved.
Bottom line: Switzerland's fine.
Not a fan of the square shape but then again I like mechanical watches better anyway.