AI can do this. Update your knowledge of AI. It’s already doing this on newer modelsOh please. AI can't even draw a picture of a human with anatomically correct hands. We don't need to fear the T-1000 anytime soon.
AI can do this. Update your knowledge of AI. It’s already doing this on newer modelsOh please. AI can't even draw a picture of a human with anatomically correct hands. We don't need to fear the T-1000 anytime soon.
If you can predict the future you already know the keys…Why isn't Apple protecting us from time travelling quantum computers that appear to predict the future because they are from the future. Shame on them!
I'm trying to get my contacts to use iMessage!!!Everyone will still use bloody WhatsApp 🤣
AI does anatomically correct hands all the time. Some models tend to produce images without accurate hands.Oh please. AI can't even draw a picture of a human with anatomically correct hands. We don't need to fear the T-1000 anytime soon.
Generate an image of an old man writing a letter. Detailed hands.
Generate an image of a man writing a letter.
You can LITERALLY do EXACTLY the same thing in iMessage 🤷♂️Oh yes it is much easier.
Just one example: sending a photo from your camera roll using the share button, you have to enter the recipients name manually or go through all of your hundreds of contacts and pick one. In Whatsapp you simply land in your recent chats overview and just click on an Avatar/Chat to send it. I can‘t wrap my head around the fact that I can not do this simplest and most logical thing within iMessage. There are dozens of more examples.
Of course cross platform is a big one but all my relatives have iPhones and still use Whatsapp. When asked why, they answer „because it‘s easier to use“.
Because quantum computing is not that open in general people. With chatgpt and sora, all people can access it. Quantum computer? How to use it? How much its price? Is it accessible to general people?I don’t know why everyone is so focused on AI when compared to quantum computing
No spy agency will be happy about it as you added there so I am confused why you led with a specific singling out of Mossad.Mossad isn't going to be happy about this. No spy agency is going to be happy about this actually. Will probably cost a fortune to figure out ways around it.
Mossad makes the news most often as liking to hack personal devices. Maybe other agencies do it more often, but Mossad either gets caught more often or doesn't mind people knowing about what they can do.No spy agency will be happy about it as you added there so I am confused why you led with a specific singling out of Mossad.
Whatsapp being the better messenger is PART of the reason why people use it over iMessage.... not just because it's cross-platform.No, people use WhatsApp in Europe because it’s cross-platform and a lot of people use Android. Adding features to iMessage won’t increase EU usage in the slightest.
It's as much their invention as Multi-Touch was... so no.Is this one of Apple’s inventions? If so, I wonder, whether they will open-source the algorithm for world-wide auditing by security researchers. How would we know, otherwise, whether the claims Apple makes are held up by reality? If they do that, of course, others will implement the same algorithm in their messaging apps, as well.
I disabled everything Siri years ago. I had no clue that Siri = iMessage showing recent contacts as a horizontal line in share bar.So you disabled the functionality, but Apple is somehow worse. Sounds like user error.
I get occasional spam on iMessage and Whatsapp. As soon as they have your number it doesn‘t really matter which messenger you use.Ah… pretty sure when I hit share on my iPhone, the first section is always people I recently messaged -
I just checked and it list my discord channels as well as people I recently texted.
Now, don’t get me wrong: Every person has their right to their own opinion. But my experience with WhatsApp has been scams and other such junk that I don’t fall for. I get that random “wrong number” text and then they wanna talk and text in WhatsApp and ask me about how much money I make.
It's not that complicated. The update is just math, and not proprietary; but it applies to iMessage. This does nothing to change the way the app fundamentally works from a user's perspective. Green bubbles are still SMS/RCS, and are outside of the iMessage protocol.Update: Answer to the #1 appears to be in the lengthy release...
- Is this a standard others can adopt too... or is this a proprietary, Apple-only protocol?
- An Apple-centric answer to RCS or in addition to RCS?
"we" appears to be Apple Inc.
What I don't see in the release is if it is to be offered as a standard for others to adopt too or if it will remain an Apple sandbox exclusive... and thus- like Facetime- not used by MOST of the texting devices in the world. Hopefully this is not about "protecting" blue bubbles vs. green bubbles.
I thoroughly applaud the innovation but the big reward in this great security leap seems to be dependent on parties at BOTH ends of the chat using it.
Or just get rid of worthless Android. I like that solution better.ok cool now release a cross platform client so your users can be secure no matter who they talk to![]()
The spy agencies designed a backdoor into some NIST newly recommended encryption protocols, so I'm pretty sure there is a backdoor in this one also. This is just too juicy for them to pass up.No spy agency will be happy about it as you added there so I am confused why you led with a specific singling out of Mossad.
I don’t talk to the majority of the world. The application will utilize the appropriate encryption depending on the end-to-end conversation limits.Good move but too bad the majority of the world don't use iMessage 😅
I am not sure what your point is. I never said anything about a "CLIENT".it’s not a cross platform CLIENT that lets people have secure imessage to imessage conversations on any device
please understand your own terms
is there a public protocol here so others can join? or is it still bulls* walled garden, that no one can join? xDDPQ3 is the next big thing for the next decade..hoping for others to join it
I am not sure what your point is. I never said anything about a "CLIENT".
I am a software engineer and I understand what a client is in the context of a application and communication protocols. it's not my "own term", and I did not use it in this thread until this reply. maybe you meant to reply to someone else?