Yeah.. Was pretty interesting how the regular 17 got the same boost to 256GB as the 17 Pro, but didn't have the price increase.So they reduced the feature gap between the main iPhone & the pro, while increasing the pricing gap.
i don’t use cover unless i go for hiking or joggingTo be honest, I am super shocked how people care about the color of their iPhone?? Don't you use covers anyway? I would take any one of them regardless![]()
Not really. Al is better for this use case. Better heat dissipation, lighter, can be anodized in more colors.No titanium is a downgrade.
It is just youIs it just me or is this GENUINELY the ugliest iPhone Apple has ever put out?
I guess it’s deep blue or skip it if you wanted a dark color like black.Bro, I had my money on a Black 17 Pro Max 512 GB, where is the Black color, I have been using black iphone since X
Not for the price it is not. Ti is more expensive. And starting price of 17P is 10% more (not like I ever bought 128GB, but still)Not really. Al is better for this use case. Better heat dissipation, lighter, can be anodized in more colors.
So they reduced the feature gap between the main iPhone & the pro, while increasing the pricing gap.
No it's not. From an industrial design standpoint, I think the new iPhone 17 Pro is absolutely ugly. That back with the glass cutout looks like a prototype. I do love the orange though.It is just you
What was your excuse last year? Not black enough?No black no deal. Holding off for another year.
Where is space grey or black? Cmon I want a dark neutral iPhone 17 Pro… this is ridiculous…
Re-read what I wrote. I said most use their phone as their sole camera, and many are going to want more versatility than a single lens setup. Which can also be achieved with the base iPhone 17.not most, most think they need a "pro" camera lol