Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well I built a Hackintosh with a PC that went obsolete after I bought my iMac recently.

It was cool to do it and all, but after the hassle I didn't fine it super fast or anything. Plus it was finicky as hell. Put a flash drive in the USB ports and I got kernel Panic. Reboot and try again it works.

Hackintosh is a good experiment and its just that.

I've been considering seriously the prospect of building a dual-boot Hackintosh to replace both my custom PC and 2007 iMac. Are Hackintoshes really that unreliable? It's hard to get an honest assessment of this as the Hackintosh community seem to be rather single-minded about how good their machines are.

Opinions of those with experience in this would be greatly appreciated as an upgrade of some sort is needed.
 
Actually, I'm kind of disappointed. I've been waiting for this year's iMac for over 6 months and what they showed yesterday is a machine that isn't really adequate for my needs.

Alright, it's thinner. Who needs the world's thinnest computer on the desk? No, that's not my main issue with the new generation, neither is it the missing optical drive. It's that they replaced the fast i7 with a crappy i5 CPU and make you pay extra cash as you customize the top of the line model to include a fast i7.

The 2.9ghz i5 seems to be way slower than the 2.3ghz i7 found in the current 15" MacBook Pro.

So, what I will do is get that 15" i7 MacBook Pro for the same price the 27" iMac is, get way extra speed, get a user replaceable HDD and RAM, get an optical drive and a battery that makes me able to work wirelessly for about 7h.

Nice move, Apple
 
Seriously - an untouched DICOM-image usually taxes in at around 10MB. Most peoples' mailbox won't even allow this size of attachment.

Seriously - have you considered the security efforts needed on both sides to have this sensitive data transferred secure.

And seriously - why change? You think optical is "stuck in the past" as Schiller said in his presentation? Guess what, there is no real substitute for cheap optical media to transfer this stuff.

Strange how my surgeon emailed my x-rays to my GP - guess the risk with humans is considered less than animals?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by righteye
I have always liked the idea of the iMac but the stand sucks i can not believe they have stuck with that design ,so in flexible and like another poster said not VESA compatible ? Apple do not even offer an alternative mounting system

EDIT; i stand corrected, there are adapters to turn the iMac (not sure about latest version) so that you can use VESA arms and brackets



Cheers for that, shame it does not come with something like that in the first place (not the full stand but the flexible arm) but in the right place thats a great stand for a Studio for example.

Also this would not be for everyone (not a mac for a start) but i do think Apple could take a few lessons from this for accessibility

http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/desktops/hp-z1-workstation-review-50008380/
 
Last edited:
The S model CPUs are power optimized, and typically reach the same turbo boost peaks as their regular counterparts.
 
But wait - you mean that my desktop computer, the one that I don't really give a rat's rump about how "thin" it is, may have to be a bit thicker to support better GPU, so that my desktop computer can help render and support all the graphic (photos, videos, etc.) processing that I desire, and want to do with my desktop computer (w/o having to spend two arms and a leg for an aged MP)?
So you'd still be happy with a Mac this fat and heavy:
imac-333mhz-grape.jpg

If it was super fast?
I would not be. I'm glad they are thin now.
 
Sound?

Looking forward for reports on the quality of the audio emitted from this thin, lightweight iMac.
That factor should not be ignored in a home environment.
 
If you are concerned about graphics cards, they got updated and improved by a significant margin today. You should be happy.
Not according to this bloke.
2011 27" GPU: 6970M - 3Dmark score: 2821
2012 27" GPU: 660M - 3Dmark score: 2320
My messages were before Apple updated the store here, before we knew they had other GPU options. So that is the reasoning behind that. There are your real facts. Can I remove the mic now?
 
Looking forward for reports on the quality of the audio emitted from this thin, lightweight iMac.
That factor should not be ignored in a home environment.

Was thinking just that!

Also, i feel Apple is falsely advertising this product because you will never see your iMac looking like the advert, by the time you add Optical drive, back up drive, card reader (unless you are a contortionist) essential if you use a CF card (Apple seem to believe that no one uses them) speakers,etc your lovely iMac will look like its crashed into a scrap yard.
I do not like to bash Apple but this seems a step backwards
Less is more,not this time, more for less would be appropriate
 
wallpaper

I'm looking for the Flower(Purple-Yellow) Wallpaper that is used here on this picture on the new iMac.
 
I'm really impressed with this latest generation. From the pictures it looks like a beautiful machine. Looking forward to playing with one in person.
 
How often do you use the optical drive?

I use it very often, for my job i have to view x-ray and MRI exams on CD.
It is a big fail for me, will buy the older model, and probably get it at a good price!

The only worthwhile upgrade is the anti reflective glass.
Don't care at all for the thinner case.
 
The new imac does look great, but I am disappointed. I will wait until i see some more detailed specs.to fully make my mind up.

I was hoping for a signifigantly faster processor.
I could forgive the lack of retina and an optical drive if it was impressively faster. But this looks just like a repackage without an optical drive.

Can someone set me straight? please tell me that it actually is faster.
:(
 
Removing the optical drive and Firewire, I can understand. It's the logical progression that started with the first iMac removing the floppy. Downloadable apps are here to stay.

...except for the fact that LOTS of people still use them, especially artists. All my hard drives and audio interfaces are firewire....film makers tend to use FW for their cameras and data transfers. So all this perfectly fine and useable equipment are now obsolete because Apple decides to abandon a protocol they encouraged everyone to use. Oh wait, they have a dongle to sell us.

Seriously, would it have been that hard to keep ONE firewire port in the high end machines? ...or at least offer it as an option.
 
I will continue saving

Personally, I don't know where my purchase decision really stands. Initially I was psyched, but when I look into it, there are a few things that bother me:

- $100 price increase. I actually have the $1,700 saved up to purchase it next summer. Now they add $100 pushing it to $1,800. Annoying, in addition to the fact that, I will be buying after market RAM to push it to 24 GBs. That is where I would have preferred to spend the $100.

- GPU options as some have mentioned, slower than the 2011 model, I think they could have bumped it to 1 GB of vRAM in the base model of the 27 inch. My HP xw workstation has 512 MBs of vRAM and that is a 5 year old system. Its a Quadro by the way.

- This is REV 1. I am not into experimenting, I will let those who are more excited than me test it first. I will wait for Rev 2 with the Haswell processors and hopeful for a better GPU. A price drop would be good (not counting on it).

- If I don't see any such revisions, I will stick with the Windows PC. This was gonna be my first Mac, but parting with this kinda money is not easy, especially on my budget. I want the best bang for my buck, but to be spending so much and then I still have to be spending more after is ridiculous. When you take into account, I will be travelling to the US to make the purchase, airfare, accomodation, food.

My reason for choosing a Mac, I just want a different computing experience at home. I use and manage Windows everday at work. No problems with Windows at home or work, but its like seeing the same person every waking minute.

If Apple does continue to make the iMac out of my reach, I honestly will just settle for a budge UltraBook from Acer. The Mac purchase is purely aesthetics, to really be investing 1800 these days on a computer which I know will ultimately be mostly for Internet use, listenng music, photo management, editing the occasional video, is in some way overkill. It probably would be best to buy an unlocked iPhone 5, iPad 4 and a decent Windows 8 Ultrabook next summer.

I remember travelling to NY a few years ago and saw the 24 inch white iMac at best buy and was so amazed at the screen size its been on my mind ever since. I travelled to Seattle last year and saw the 27 inch iMac and was even more impressed. That probably sealed the deal to save towards one.

The new iMac is a combination of mixed feelings, maybe seeing one in person will change my feelings. Ultimately, its all about the display for me, but I want the investment to be worth it. After all, I expect to keep this computer for 5 to 10 years. (I use them till they die, my DELL Dimension 8300 died in June '12, had it since March '04).

Another issue is the reports of display issues especially on rev 1. Macs. My plan is to set it up where ever I am staying and do some intense testing, keeping it running non-stop throughout my stay in the US. If it goes bad once during my stay, I will immediately take it back to the Apple store and ask for a refund. We don't have any Apple stores here where I live and the Apple Authorized testers charge an arm and a leg to fix these things.

Apple really should have kept the 2011 iMac 27 form factor alive and updated it with the new processors and I/O ports (USB 3). I think it would be a good option for those who still want live in the past as Phill put it.
 
Does anyone know a website which would help me configure the whole computer, like say choose processor, ram, hard drive, gpu etc then calculate the over all cost, i would just like to compare it with imac and see how much is the difference.

I did found one pugetsystems and tried configuring the better of 21.5 inch imac which would be selling at $1500, thing is, when i configured it to match this imac (i tried to match close, not exact) the cost adds upto $1800+. I might be doing something wrong cos everybody says apple computers are very costly and i beleive it most of the time.

can anyone help?
 
I was really thinking of getting this, but I think I'm going to have to pass.

thin and light is great when using a laptop or a tablet, I don't see the advantage in a desktop unit. I'm not concerned with these in a non portable and would prefer to have an optical drive. I'm not willing to spend more money and have increased desk clutter to have an external dvd drive.

I'm just not willing to pay these prices for less functionality and I can't imagine anyone that wants an optical drive would buy one of these machines. Unfortunately the Mac Pro's have become strictly pro machines ($$$) and those that would take a tower are left out in the cold here.

beyond that I hate that with every new machine I have less and less user serviceable parts. I want to be able to do minor upgrades. I'm not going to buy a new computer every couple years and being able to upgrade parts is huge in extending the life of you computer.

just my 2¢


Exactly right. I bought a Mac Pro for those and other reasons. If you calculate for a period of 4 or 5 years, it's actually the cheapest Mac too.
 
SD Card reader location

My 2010 iMac is on my desk against the wall. Putting SD cards involves nothing more than a lean to the right in my chair. With the 2012 I'll have to pull it away and stand up to get a visual of the port.

I HAVE BECOME SO LAZY!!!

But still, from a "user experience" perspective I think it has gone backwards [pun not originally intended].
 
...and that signs the end of the ODD era.

Macbook Air - Early 2008
Macbook Air (The Next Generation of MacBooks) - Late 2010 [Here is where it started]
Mac mini - Mid 2011
Macbook Pro 15"- Mid 2012
Macbook Pro 13"- Late 2012
iMac - Late 2012

So, it took about 2 years, to fade it out completely.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.