Those two contradict, but by all means continue ranting.
Fair enough, The mid range pricing you are getting less and paying more.
I am not ranting, just disappointed with their pricing over here.
Those two contradict, but by all means continue ranting.
The 20" iMac features a downgrade in graphics card power, and increased price. The 24" iMacs are cheaper, sure, but basically no upgrade.
The Mac Mini is a fairly lackluster upgrade that is priced $100-$200 too much, IMO.
There is also no solution for someone like me, who has an excellent 24" external monitor, but can find no Mac desktop with a decent graphics card that has no display. The Mac Mini would be attractive, if it had better graphics , at least as an option. But you can't drive a 24" display at full resolution with integrated graphics, even on a movie, let alone gaming.
And finally, in regard to price. I will probably end up purchasing a Windows 7 performance laptop for $1700 that will easily beat the high-end iMac in value and specs, as well as quality. It'll also be portable. The fact that there is no midrange Apple desktop is pathetic. The laptop I'm looking at is more upgradeable than the iMac (you can replace the processor, HDD, optical drive, etc.). You can also get a new machine and keep the old display.
Apple fails on value, performance, and upgradeability. But it doesn't matter, because it's got an Apple logo on it, right?
What laptop would that be?![]()
Ok, I think this thread is definite proof that the majority of Apple enthusiasts have little business acumen, and are overly concerned with specifications.
YES, Macs are more expensive, and now seem highly pricey in the UK economic climate, but Apple is not catering to teenagers and/or college students on a budget.
For their target market, Core 2 Duo nearing 3Ghz is truly BLAZING fast, and for the majority of their customers the graphics card never goes beyond iMovie.
Moreover, they have no obligation to make their computers more affordable for anyone. It is their prerogative to lose customers but make a higher profit per machine. In fact, it could be a deliberate ploy, since it is much easier to maintain a smaller user base while maintaining profits.
I don't agree with it, as a matter of principle, but it is very solid business strategy, because the people willing to pay over the odds for a mac without grumbling are the people who will come back in 2-3 years time for another, and will be most aware of the imac screen size, rather than the number next to the $ sign.
Everyone swearing blind about price is honestly not in Apple's target market, sorry.
You get charged state tax if there is an Apple Store in the state it is being shipped to.
The only Mac I'd suggest to anyone if they were interested in one.Lets see.
Now supports dual monitors.
Now has much better graphics
Now supports 4GB of ram and at $150 extra over 1 gb, that is not too bad...
I really like the ability to have dual monitors on a mini! I probably wouldn't have bought my last imac if this mini was available then!
Now I just gotta find a good reason to get one...
That's such BS! It's been no secret that Apple charges a lot for their computer and there was no mention that they might be lowering prices with the new hardware. So if you're gonna lie, you might want to tell one that we can believe.![]()
Glad you asked.http://www.xoticpc.com/sager-np8660-built-clevo-m860tu-p-2411.html?wconfigure=yes
EDIT: And yeah, portability isn't a big deal to me, but I figure I might as well have it, if I can get something with it for cheaper than an iMac.
It's not b.s. I'm a long time Mac user who is now looking squarely at buying a cheaper PC alternative. I love the Mac experience but not that much. There are plenty of alternatives for iLife applications on the PC. Some better, some not. I've used a PC enough to know the advantages and disadvantages. Also, Windows 7 looks promising enough for me to make a switch back. I was hoping Apple would be reasonable with pricing the Mac Mini or iMac (if Apple is going to price it that high, you need somewhat comparable features to the alternative).
I will always love my Mac Centris 610 (my first Mac), PowerBook 165c, Bondi iMac, sunflower iMac, PowerBook 12" G4, and my MacBook. However, enough is enough. I am now voicing my displeasure with the high prices with my wallet. Windows 7 here I come.
The P7350 is much less than $200.Macrumors really should have separated the iMac and Mac Mini announcements. The Mac Mini is taking some of the iMacs beating.
I really like the Mini's update. It's never been this powerful. The complainers need to understand that this CPU is a $200 part with a TDP of 25W!
Stick an SSD in the mini (which is a lot easier than the iMac) and you have one heck of a speedy (and green) computer.
I really like the Mini's update. It's never been this powerful.
Ok, I think this thread is definite proof that the majority of Apple enthusiasts have little business acumen, and are overly concerned with specifications.
YES, Macs are more expensive, and now seem highly pricey in the UK economic climate, but Apple is not catering to teenagers and/or college students on a budget.
For their target market, Core 2 Duo nearing 3Ghz is truly BLAZING fast, and for the majority of their customers the graphics card never goes beyond iMovie.
Moreover, they have no obligation to make their computers more affordable for anyone. It is their prerogative to lose customers but make a higher profit per machine. In fact, it could be a deliberate ploy, since it is much easier to maintain a smaller user base while maintaining profits.
I don't agree with it, as a matter of principle, but it is very solid business strategy, because the people willing to pay over the odds for a mac without grumbling are the people who will come back in 2-3 years time for another, and will be most aware of the imac screen size, rather than the number next to the $ sign.
Everyone swearing blind about price is honestly not in Apple's target market, sorry.
I live in NYC and I am considering going to Delaware to purchase my iMac, my family lives in Jersey so three days back home to visit and make a side trip to tax free shopping. I plan on making a few upgrades so it will have to be shipped. My question is will I still get hit with taxes if I purchase in Delaware and have shipped to NYC?
Macrumors really should have separated the iMac and Mac Mini announcements. The Mac Mini is taking some of the iMacs beating.
I really like the Mini's update. It's never been this powerful. The complainers need to understand that this CPU is a $200 part with a TDP of 25W!
Stick an SSD in the mini (which is a lot easier than the iMac) and you have one heck of a speedy (and green) computer.
So I assume you are actually in the market for a new computer as your current one isnt very capable for what you do anymore right? You wouldnt happen to just be a complainer who isnt even in the market right?
I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt though, as you've actually made your case instead of some of the "ZOMG!madd mad! theses prices are insane!!".