Possibly. I find that compared to when iPads first came out, the lineup is now too bloated. They need to streamline it better.I think you answered your own question. There has to be actual reasons to pay more for a pro.
Possibly. I find that compared to when iPads first came out, the lineup is now too bloated. They need to streamline it better.I think you answered your own question. There has to be actual reasons to pay more for a pro.
The M4 iPad Pro has been out for a year and the M5 version will be along in a few months so putting an M3 in the Air is just petty penny pinching.Why would they use the same chip their "PRO" line (and more expensive) uses? The iPad Air is a lesser model.
Yikes, even the Magic KBs lineup are getting confusing.Exactly how is the new Magic KB compatible with the M2 iPad Air, but not the M1 and M2 iPad Pros, lol.
Same for iPhones.Possibly. I find that compared to when iPads first came out, the lineup is now too bloated. They need to streamline it better.
Agreed. Why do you need a touchpad on a touchscreen device.Man, I hate these new keyboards that force the trackpad on us...what I want is an updated version of the much more elegant SMART Keyboard Folio!!!! Ugh.
Not necessarily, but I also barely notice any difference with any recent Mac, iPhone, Watch, Apple TV…Does anyone notice any difference with m1 iPad vs anything else higher
So it was the iPad Air and the iPad that has been announced not the M4 Macbook Air. And why does the iPad Air have the M3 not the M4 and the iPad have the A16 and not A17 Pro? Weird decisions in my opinion.
I know this was expected and the iPad Air was coming with an M3 according to rumors but… it still doesn’t make much sense, unless this is a strategy to clean up the inventory of remaining M3 chips, and launch an M4 iPad Air later this year.
The N3B process was meant to be transitional and short lived, so my guess is that both the iPad mini and iPad Air are now the devices using the remaining stock of A17Pro and M3 chips, respectively.
A lot of comments and concerns about it having an M3 rather than an M4, but let’s be real for a moment… how many ipad users are even coming close to using the full potential of any of the M-series chips? Apple keeps updating them because it gives them new products to sell, but I find it hard to believe that anyone’s M1 iPad Air is struggling to handle whatever they’re doing on iPadOS. If it is, that’s what the Pro is for.The M4 iPad Pro has been out for a year and the M5 version will be along in a few months so putting an M3 in the Air is just petty penny pinching.
The Studio with more cores, still far outperforms any M3, though.Man I was WAY off!
I thought it was "Lets clear the "AIR" on why the studio is still on the m2 series"
It's almost like they want you to get an Macbook Air instead lolAgreed. Why do you need a touchpad on a touchscreen device.
Do we think the MacBook Air Mgets announced later this week?
I know that but it is still a weird decision nonetheless.A lot of comments and concerns about it having an M3 rather than an M4, but let’s be real for a moment… how many ipad users are even coming close to using the full potential of any of the M-series chips? Apple keeps updating them because it gives them new products to sell, but I find it hard to believe that anyone’s M1 iPad Air is struggling to handle whatever they’re doing on iPadOS. If it is, that’s what the Pro is for.
Personally I think it’s a lot less complicated than it has been in years.Possibly. I find that compared to when iPads first came out, the lineup is now too bloated. They need to streamline it better.
I have the M2 and I don’t feel a need to upgrade but it’s only $130 with trade in credit. That’s really not that much to have the newest and best thing.For everyone like me who has the iPad Air m2... like don't upgrade it's useless.
I can guarantee you there are more iPad users with non M-series iPads than with them.For everyone like me who has the iPad Air m2... like don't upgrade it's useless.