Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mac mini is irrelevant in terms of sales units. The only reason Apple sells it is to democratize the development of iOS apps. At $599, it essentially helps maintain and expand the iOS ecosystem. It’s also a token way to tell the White House Apple is doing something to build in the U.S. But just don’t show them the graph below.

View attachment 2607496
what… the mac pro sells three times as many mac studios… that’s utter BS… and I question these results if that’s something they are stating as fact…
 
And at the $599 price point, a low-volume app developer will be better off with the new "low-cost" MacBook that's coming any day now.

Who wouldn't want a sleek, portable, all-in-one with a screen, keyboard, trackpad and battery (UPS) for the same price?
The Mini will have a more powerful processor, more USB/Thunderbolt ports, likely more memory and likely more SSD storage. An external monitor will likely have far more viewing area than what's on a laptop and buying a keyboard allows one to get a keyboard that best meets his/her needs (I greatly prefer the feel of a mechanical keyboard to any laptop keyboard).

To top it off, one can keep the keyboard and monitor when upgrading.
 
If I were shopping for a desktop computer, I’d never get an iMac because I’d rather get a Mac mini and a third-party 32-inch 4K 16:9 IPS display, a 4K webcam, and a 2.1 speaker system. All of that combined would be around the staring price of an iMac.
 
Many people here probably have no idea, but the Mac mini has become the go-to machine for Clawbot, a sort of DIY AI assistant. It'll be interesting to see if there's any perceptible sales bump from this new odd trend.
 
Mac mini is irrelevant in terms of sales units. The only reason Apple sells it is to democratize the development of iOS apps. At $599, it essentially helps maintain and expand the iOS ecosystem. It’s also a token way to tell the White House Apple is doing something to build in the U.S. But just don’t show them the graph below.

View attachment 2607496
Mac Pro was 200% more popular than Mac Studio???
 
Well, laptops are more popular than desktops even in the PC/Widows market and that trend is expected to continue (i.e. laptops sales continue to increase, desktops continue to decrease). That said, I think that Apple's MacBooks are still the most popular BRAND of laptop in many countries (but NOT by total unit sales of device type).

However, I think there is little doubt that the Mac mini is the "best" desktop computer you can find for under $600, maybe even for anything under $800 or a bit more (depending upon planned usage). Quite frankly, I waiting and waiting for the M5-based Mac mini as my next computer and I hope it doesn't suffer a price increase this year.
 
Many people here probably have no idea, but the Mac mini has become the go-to machine for Clawbot, a sort of DIY AI assistant. It'll be interesting to see if there's any perceptible sales bump from this new odd trend.
It's not just OpenClaw/ClawBot (whatever it is called this week). Thanks to the RAM and NAND madness, the Mini is a hell of a deal and has 3 Thunderbolt ports that give it a lot of flex capability.

It's a niche product, but people are going to keep finding more niches for them. Especially if places like Micro Center can keep selling the base model for $430 regularly.

I wonder if the move to assembly in the US will coincide with an update to M5?
 
It's not just OpenClaw/ClawBot (whatever it is called this week). Thanks to the RAM and NAND madness, the Mini is a hell of a deal and has 3 Thunderbolt ports that give it a lot of flex capability.

It's a niche product, but people are going to keep finding more niches for them. Especially if places like Micro Center can keep selling the base model for $430 regularly.

I wonder if the move to assembly in the US will coincide with an update to M5?

Really, the Mac Studio is kind of the go-to machine for local LLMs. I picked up a used M1 Ultra with 128GB of RAM for $2k. For $4k with 128GB/2TB and a M4 Max it's still a great deal and more useful overall than the Nvidia Spark.
 
Mac mini is irrelevant in terms of sales units. The only reason Apple sells it is to democratize the development of iOS apps. At $599, it essentially helps maintain and expand the iOS ecosystem. It’s also a token way to tell the White House Apple is doing something to build in the U.S. But just don’t show them the graph below.

View attachment 2607496
After 40+ years, let's face it: Mac desktops are a failure.
 
Great video and worth the watch! Glad Apple is making themselves a good server again. They look like U2 size instead of the U1 like the Xserve was. I remember back when Apple was running somewhere around 50% of their servers on Xserve.

what… the mac pro sells three times as many mac studios… that’s utter BS… and I question these results if that’s something they are stating as fact…
That was a while ago when the M2 Mac Pro was still relatively new compared to now, where it is outdated and needing an update, badly. Hello M5 Ultra or more. That is why they don't sell as many Mac Pro's as Mac Mini's as Apple stated in the video.
 
I'm surprised that the Mini doesn't make up a higher percentage of sales
Probably the same reason why desktop PC sales have been declining over the last decade or so, most people want the flexibility to use the laptop anywhere they happen to be.

I switched from laptop in 2017 to a desktop, then to a Mac mini M1, but went back a laptop with a MacBook Pro M4 Pro last time, because I sometimes want to use it in other rooms.

At work we were mostly desktop, but most backoffice staff now have laptops and only the logistics office (booking trucks in and out of the sites) and the production and laboratories are still using SFF PCs, because those are positions that can't benefit from flexible working.
 
Production costs will be significantly higher, and the price of these units should rise sharply in the US. If not, Apple is subsidizing these devices and will likely charge a higher price internationally than necessary, given the significantly lower production costs.
All of that is already true.

With the tariffs and exchange rate decline, they should already be more expensive in the US. Yet they are significantly more expensive internationally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marte91 and KeithBN
I think US chip production is more realistic than it gets credit for. As standard of living improves in China and India (and continues to stagnate here in the US) comparatively underpaid workers in the East will demand more. If it's just "a little bit cheaper" to mfg half way across the world, the savings might not justify drawbacks like political uncertainty and cultural/language barriers. Where else will the Mega Corps go? 2nd-World countries with 1B+ population and minimal regulation can't just be conjured out of thin air.

EDIT: chip/electronics production (High Electronics as I'll call it)
There’s still some way to go, if you split the world into four economic groups

1 billion live on $32 or more per day
3 billion on $16
2 billion on $4
1 billion on $1 per day

As you say the world is getting richer, it really is doing well, but there’s still a lot of countries ripe for finding cheaper labour.

That said, I don’t think that this assembly plant will require many/any employees handy with a screw driver. It will be largely automated.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.