But you have to use the YouTube mobile app instead of going to the actual website. And for a product that was marketed as the "the best way to experience the internet", I'd be kinda upset that you're limited in using websites.Seriously, is the lack of flash really that big of a deal? So you can't see some videos in a particular website. Big deal. Any time that has happened to me, I just got to YouTube and invariably i can find the video in about two seconds. Not having flash is such a non-issue. It seems to be more of a rallying cry for all the apple haters out there.
But who's to say that should be the goal? Apple knows it could carve a giant chunk of the market out if it wanted to with a few simple moves.The game could be completely different if Apple opened their platforms to third parties.
That's not a mistake or an oversight; that's exactly where they want to be. Apple intentionally and regularly takes steps that cap their expansion. That's their choice, and the result leaves plenty of opportunities for competitors to fill untapped markets. Android is a perfect example of that.But they don't, so eventually they will go back to their niche and leave the lion share of the market to somebody else who is willing to play well with others. This time it's going to be Google.
1m and 2 have happened rapidly. Who wants to guess when we will see 3, 4, 5, and 6m?
Rocketman
The revolution/magic comes from incremental learning and improvements made over the last decade by Apple leading to this moment. In 2000, Apple knew how to make a good computer. They then iterated from there to OS X, to the iPod, iTunes, iTunes Music Store, iPhone, iPod touch, iPhone application store, and now the iPad, the iBook store and the iPad app store.
Competitors are trying to take their desktop/laptop experience and go straight to the tablet world, sans the incremental learning and improvements. This is a tough road, and it shows in the products they have produced so far, and the products they are attempting to bring to the market in the future. They may produce a worthy competitor someday, but it may be years off at this point.
The magic is that Apple is the only company in the world that can deliver on such a product, end user experience, price point, and polish today, due to their unique experience this past decade, and do it so overwhelmingly good, that 2 million people line up for it in the first 60 days. That's what we're celebrating today. Way to go Apple!
But you have to use the YouTube mobile app instead of going to the actual website. And for a product that was marketed as the "the best way to experience the internet", I'd be kinda upset that you're limited in using websites.
This is good news but... There is no competition yet. iPad hasn't won anything. Let's see how this market falls out in a year. One can't dismiss Android and HP/WebOS tablets just yet.
Hahahaha! Truth and facts make no difference when it comes to people's blind fear and hatred of whatever they think Apple represents.
Great news. I was told that iPad was nothing more than a big iPhone, to which I replied that a swimming pool is nothing more than a big bath tub!
Let see what the Android has to offer, but they don't have the apps.
Heh heh. Yeah I heard that a lot about the iPod vs Zune too, and about a half-dozen other smart phones against the iPhone. Just more bugs on Apple's windshield.
Well said!!Apple deserves massive credit for getting a new product so right and sending all the potential competitor scrambling.
Hating on the iPad is just ridiculous. If it doesn't fit your needs, don't get one, no need to blow a gasket.
Well done Steve and Apple...well deserved - thanks for such a great device - looking forward to how this plays out in the years to come - truly a magical product.
![]()
Those articles are stupid.
The US trails because they have a massive infrastructure of hard wired lines that people have used for years while these other so-called "advanced" countries were living in mud huts. So with the advance of technology it becomes feasible for them to have phone service, and they end up with wireless every where.
Don't get me wrong, it is a good thing that a lot of these backwater countries went from literally no phone service at all to flushed out cell service, but for people to claim that they are more technologically advanced, or for them of all things claim these backwater countries that create none of the actual technology used in the process are some how more advanced is absolutely absurd.
We don't have the same cell penetration rates of other countries because we have a hard-wired infrastructure several layers deep that is probably more extensive than all the rest of the world combined.
...Anyways, it is funny how I point out what I would use an ipad for and how useless it is, and fanboys like you just resort to name calling because you know I am right and you can't debate.![]()
I don't know... I certainly couldn't/wouldn't want to spend hours surfing the web on my iPod at home.what exactly is magical about it again? what's it do that an ipod doesn't?
what exactly is magical about it again? what's it do that an ipod doesn't?
I thought that was part of the magical experience of using the ipad, being able to do things like plan a trip from your couch. So I guess planning a trip is something you can't do with an Ipad.
what exactly is magical about it again? what's it do that an ipod doesn't?
Android is an OS, iPhone is hardware. Android is on phones being given away for free with contract by phone companies, iPhones are not.android is outselling the iphone, and with only half it's market share currently, beating it in ad revenue as well. if you don't think apple is scared to death of google or anyone else, you may want to reconsider facts. the reason apple has been suing everyone lately, and pissing adobe and google off on a regular basis is because they
As a lecturer and public speaker all around Asia i have all my course notes and lectures and reference material in one easy to hold back-lit device. So that is 'magical' for me. MyiPod could not do that, nor even my iPhone.
Ohh by the way (giggle) it does a whole lot more - than a mere iPod!! Visit an Apple store sometime and test the two devices side by side (giggle)![]()
That's it? I thought we covered that when we said *big* iPod Touch? May be I am starting to get it - the rest is left for people to make up - depending on my creativity to play games with my mind I can either find it revolutionary, magical, Saves-us-from-Flash, less-is-better, or find it to be just another useless shiny gadget.
If I was into some powerful stuff that alters my brain composition I would come out yelling - magical and revolutionary and can even convince myself that for more simplicity I need 4 of them - one for email, one for browser, one for iTunes and one for running an HTML5 site just to convince me Flash is not needed. Never have to think about which window to close, where to click and where the next app icon is.
Left to reality however it's just a shiny big iPod touch - nothing magical or revolutionary about it. That people buy it does not make it any more interesting than a big iPod touch. With enough clever marketing and advertising people will buy anything.