There it is.
Now where are all the people who moved the goal post from "no one is offended" to "no one *on MacRumors* is offended"? lol
?
I don't understand.
There it is.
Now where are all the people who moved the goal post from "no one is offended" to "no one *on MacRumors* is offended"? lol
It seems like you're quite sensitive to criticism of the ad, viewing it as an attack on something you value. Apple itself decided to pull the ad, as they recognized it did not convey the right message. Your strong emotional response and frustration towards those who didn't like the ad is clouding your ability to see why it was pulled.These snowflakes drives my gears…
This ad was great
was speaking to others. sorry didn't mean to tag you.?
I don't understand.
2004 called, it wants its stupid insults back 🙄so many people eating GMO soy these days it makes them super sensitive.
Your response seems quite intense. Accusing others of having mental health issues over their reaction to an ad, complete with multiple exclamation points, suggests you might be the one who's overly sensitive here. Many people recognized that the ad was poorly thought out, conveying a message Apple itself decided was inappropriate. It's clear Apple acknowledges this—why can't you?
Maybe it’s worth considering if your strong reaction is clouding your judgment.
You two clearly have reading comprehension issues. I responded to someone who claimed people were feeling depressed, worthless and powerless, which anyone would tell you is more than just a negative emotion. Feelings of depression and worthlessness are serious issues, do you not agree? The ad wasn't that bad. If a normally mentally healthy person suddenly is depressed and has feelings of worthlessness after watching the ad, then yes, some help is suggested.The outrage over the outrage is utterly hilarious.
So a piece of art can't possibly elicit any negative emotions in anyone but the mentally ill? I guess we really should just crush all those instruments.
Apple was wrong to cave in my opinion. Just another sign of the minority controlling the narrative.
You're being culturally insensitive. Different cultures are allowed to have different way of thinking about things.There it is.
Now where are all the people who moved the goal post from "no one is offended" to "no one *on MacRumors* is offended"? lol
The sensitivity to watch out for is the shareholders’.It was an ill conceived AD that shows a tone deafness we've rarely seen from Apple and it's a bit jarring.
Apple have always been very measured in their communications and especially in advertisements.
Having something like this get all the way through from concept to execution to release without some alarm bells going off internally is fairly worrying about the state of things inside the company honestly.
We used to just miss the Product Editor (Steve) ... now we are even missing a tone, direction and taste editor.
The "Apple" just keeps getting farther from the tree we all loved.
It seems you're particularly sensitive to the idea that Apple should not have withdrawn the ad. Why is that? Is it unsettling to think that your perspective on the ad might be in error due to lack of taste, or that you might not fully appreciate why many found it objectionable?You two clearly have reading comprehension issues. I responded to someone who claimed people were feeling depressed, worthless and powerless, which anyone would tell you is more than just a negative emotion. Feelings of depression and worthlessness are serious issues, do you not agree? The ad wasn't that bad. If a normally mentally healthy person suddenly is depressed and has feelings of worthlessness after watching the ad, then yes, some help is suggested.
I might also point out that many people thought there was nothing wrong with the ad, probably more so than those who became depressed and felt worthless. Apple was wrong to cave in my opinion. Just another sign of the minority controlling the narrative.
The sensitivity to watch out for is the shareholders’.
Nope.You're being culturally insensitive.
Nope.
In the post you quoted, I'm simply pointing out that people found it offensive, as others on this forum have said no one is offended by it. They were wrong.
Your certainty that the ad is not offensive stems from a lack of cultivated taste, which is actually quite common since true taste is rare and requires careful development.Is the ad kinda dry? Yes. Offensive? Absolutely not
People who dismiss concerns about the ad seem to have a strong emotional connection to Apple, leading them to view any criticism as an unwarranted attack on a beloved brand. This connection makes it hard for them to objectively evaluate the criticisms.I definitely felt like something was off while watching the ad. The destruction of all those props was difficult to watch, never mind the emotional attachment to the plight of the mannequin and the squeeze toy as they wait to be crushed to death. I'm glad I wasn't alone in feeling this way and that they're not going to run it. The optics are just really tone deaf.
For those crying "snowflake" or "touch grass" -- is it so hard to fathom that something you think is acceptable has touched a nerve in other people? This outcry didn't come out of nowhere; people were clearly affected by this -- if not the visuals then the implications of what was being destroyed in an age where AI seems to be taking over everything artistic. Maybe you should be asking yourself why YOU weren't more outraged by it.
I did, just cry babies always looking to get offended, companies don’t want bad PR and it just makes the woke moment look even more weak nowwho thought this was a good idea?!
I did, just cry babies always looking to get offended, companies don’t want bad PR and it just makes the woke moment look even more weak now
Apple's new AI marketing bot?who thought this was a good idea?!
This commercial probably wouldn't have bothered anyone 10 years ago, but I think you're right about the AI angle. It's probably one of the main reasons people are upset, especially with all the talks surrounding Apple and AI lately.For those crying "snowflake" or "touch grass" -- is it so hard to fathom that something you think is acceptable has touched a nerve in other people? This outcry didn't come out of nowhere; people were clearly affected by this -- if not the visuals then the implications of what was being destroyed in an age where AI seems to be taking over everything artistic. Maybe you should be asking yourself why YOU weren't more outraged by it.
Yeah. I can understand that. The more I think about it, the more I realize this ad is garbage.I found it offensive. I grew up in Japan and we don't treat our tools lightly. It's similar to how US soldiers (as well as other countries) treat their uniforms. With the utmost respect.