Well they need something because the current iphone is a joke
Which is why they surpassed the Motorola Razr in sales (over 6 million in the US), and so many other smartphones want to be just like it! ....
Well they need something because the current iphone is a joke
Wrong.
Windows mobile phones with touch date back to circa 2000-02.
The IBM Simon, a touchscreen smartphone, was sold by Bell South back in 1993.
Your post would be better if it were true. But LG beat Apple to the touch interface and look by about 6 months.
![]()
You mean touch input, the interface on the iphone is uniquely apples, and built entirely around ease of use, which for some reason others dont seem to grasp fully.
Yep, I have no problem with that. I was just responding to a poster's comment that before the iPhone, nothing looked close to it.Note that Apple's patent application was in 2006.
Obviously touch has been around a while, it's just a rumors site, I doubt anyone in here has a graduate thesis in the history of touch technology... do you?
At least you could brush us up on the intricacies of touch screen interfaces.
In all the histories from interviews with Jobs and others, they state that while they had an idea for getting into the phone business somehow, the iPhone engineering team was not created until around December 2005 - January 2006.
Which makes it remarkable that they got as far as they did in one year before it was shown off in January 2007. (Although a couple months before that, Jobs reportedly said "we don't have a product yet".)
You have no evidence that the Pre violates apples patents. It could accomplish the same result in a way different enough that its not a violation.
Some of you guys are awful quick to jump the gun.
Which is why it sells like hotcakes......![]()
Which is why they surpassed the Motorola Razr in sales (over 6 million in the US), and so many other smartphones want to be just like it! ....![]()
lil wayne sells songs like hotcakes too, does that mean he isn't a joke?
You think it only took a year to make it? Nevertheless, I had the idea 7 years ago.![]()
lil wayne sells songs like hotcakes too, does that mean he isn't a joke?
I agree.
And congrats to Apple on the patent.
My question is, if this does shut down these other phones such as the Pre what are the alternatives to a Multi-touch screen like the iPhone?
Ya know, some of you are saying that this doesn't necessarily KILL the competition but pushes innovation from other phone makers. Well, what do you think that next HUGE innovation would be?
The iPhone UI is pretty slick, would be (and has proven to be so far) hard to surpass with some NEW UI that's gonna draw people away from Apple.
I hope Apple will do the right thing and license the technology, if it is actually being used by Palm (another poster in the industry suggested that the patent affects only a very small aspect of the interface).
A couple of years ago, Creative Labs won the patent for the interface used by MP3 players such as Apple's iPod. Apple and Creative had talks and managed to come to a mutually beneficial arrangement. This is how it should be with this. But it's Apple calling the shots this time, and I'm not sure how friendly they'll be about it.
I dont think Apple will take the name calling and attitude palm has towards them lightly.
Well, I dunno. Creative and Apple were at each other like rabid dogs before Creative got the patent. Money has a great way of healing old wounds.
You cant place the millions and millions of sales of the iphone down to apple fanboys or the uneducated. There is a reason why people love it. I think it comes down to the ease of use in such a good looking package.
Fact is that the iphone does lack some features, but most consumers clearly either dont care about those features, or dont care enough about them to warrant buying anything else.
Lack of copy/paste,MMS, etc a pathetic phone does not make.
Also, Apple almost never does what people say they NEED to do, and somehow keep bringing game changers to the market.
You're clearly not even reading the thread if you think this means apple has a patent on the touchscreen.I think you understand what I am really trying to say. The iphone is a great idea and we all know why its great yada yada, but if they are going to leave basic and important features out of it, and then patent the touch screen and judging from what people are saying in this thread; eliminating all competitors from using it, then that is bush league.
It lacks enough basic features to me to justify not getting it, so I am waiting for either it or another phone to come out with what everyone wants. But now apple is going to attempt to shut that down and make me wait for them to dish out a "software update" that will never come? Maaan, FUNK DAT!
This is where apple has almost always been ahead of the game. Most companies just deal with the here and now, while apple goes and tries to see what you will want later. In doing so they are often at the forefront of innovation.According to Innovator's Dilemma, a book by a Harvard Business professor, companies that do what customers say they need to do, fail. Companies that guess correctly what customers will actually want 2 or 3 years later, often something completely different from what they said they wanted, are the ones that succeed.
.
thanks to you trusty fanboys who will continue to buy every rendition of the iphone regardless of how many features are left out (just so they will get you to buy another one).