"You do realize that the right to personal property is just an agreement brought by human conflicts in the last couple thousand years, and a controversial one, right?"
The concept of "private property" and the rights of individuals to protect their own, is a fundamental and essential concept of human liberty.
It's apropos that one of the foundations of communism is the abolition of "private property".
It is telling that these two concepts are diametrically opposed.
Having written that, although I'm not opposed to the Apple Board of Directors granting large stock options and/or bonuses to their upper echelon of executives in exchange for four or five years of guaranteed service, it seems unwise to simply reward them for keeping their seats warm regardless of how well the company performs over the next several years. How much they receive should be reflective of how much revenue the company earns over that period. Don't pay people before and until they perform!
No. Take a deep breath, take it all in. No.
p.s.
For those downvoting. i challenge you to put up a thought trough, logical, well written response stating why this is necessarily so, and why i am necessarily wrong. My bet, you cant. There is no such thing. If it was the case, the question wouldnt have been debated for several hundred years. Heck, one man even went as far as to call this concept the enslaver of the i (Max Stirner, if anyone care). But yeah, feel free to swing. Just make it worth my time giving you a response if you do.
Last edited: