Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Beat me to it! It would be totally asinine for Apple to release a new architecture machine and stick SATA based solid state drives in it.

On the flip side I'm not sure why people seem to think that these drives would automatically be expensive as Apple continues to drive down the cost of flash storage on its machines. In reality they have very good deals at release time. By the time the mac Pro actually comes out these could be $500 drives, Ok maybe $1000 drives with Apples Tax. However the point is that flash drives don't have to be expensive and if he technology is all Apples, remember Anobit, they don't have to pay for somebodies else development costs.


SATA? For the price and size of the Mac Pro, PCIe is the way to go, and there are already 2TB PCIe drives, and they work on Hackintoshes.
http://www.oczenterprise.com/interfaces/pci-express.html
:confused:
 
Since when does Apple put their logo on hard drives used in their computers? How would you know that it's a 2TB drive from just seeing one on a factory tour? Seems pretty fishy to me.

Since ages ago. My 1997, 1999 and 2003 "pro" machines all had Apple-branded drives. I haven't bought one since but am hoping to change that... :)
 
Why? 2 TB of solid state memory is overkill, especially for what Apple's likely to charge for it. It'd cost more then the core Tower. Graphics card included.

A 2 TB Fusion type drive, now that I could see.
 
I tried upgrading an old MBP to an OWC solid state, and firmware issues, garbage collection, or something kept making the machine crash. This was after they had supposedly fixed the problem with firmware. I returned it and waited...

I now have a rMBP with an apple SSD installed, and have 0 issues. 3rd party may sound good on paper, but often causes tons of headaches.

I hope they sell the bare drive so I can throw it in a thunderbolt enclosure for some sweet performance with my MBP. I hate waiting for drives to spin up, and hate wasting heat and energy keeping them spinning.

No need to get an apple drive. Buy a good drive like a samsung 830/840 or an intel ssd and you'll have zero problems.
 
i'd rather see a more affordable core i-7 class mac pro option

What a lot of customers want and Apple will never let it happen.
A well configured $1,500 i7 system that absolutely wipes the
floor with the $2,500 base Mac Pro will never see the light of day. :(
 
Why? 2 TB of solid state memory is overkill, especially for what Apple's likely to charge for it. It'd cost more then the core Tower. Graphics card included.

A 2 TB Fusion type drive, now that I could see.

When you need speed, there is no such thing as too fast or overkill. When I need to offload and backup 2 TB/day, every single second counts.
 
Why? 2 TB of solid state memory is overkill
images
 
Thunderbolt and USB 3 are a guarantee. There's no way they would have them in a MBP but not the MP.
BD Drive, though? Good luck with that one. Apple is moving away from physical media and has rejected BD numerous times.

Edit: USB 3, not USB 2. herp derp.

I just want the front slot as before that is all. I can manage to put in a drive or BD w/r myself if the SATA internal port is available.
 
What a lot of customers want and Apple will never let it happen.
A well configured $1,500 i7 system that absolutely wipes the
floor with the $2,500 base Mac Pro will never see the light of day. :(

Has anyone ever done a cost breakdown of the iMac?

I wonder how much of the price of an i7 iMac is the screen...

That could give some clue as to what a headless Mac should cost.

(granted... that wouldn't include Apple's markup... I'm still curious though)
 
Thunderbolt and USB 3 are a guarantee. There's no way they would have them in a MBP but not the MP.
BD Drive, though? Good luck with that one. Apple is moving away from physical media and has rejected BD numerous times.

Edit: USB 3, not USB 2. herp derp.

I would have agreed with you for the 2012 release .... but it didn't happen then, either.

I'd also like to see an Apple-branded USB3 card....today.

What I've really been waiting for progress on is Grand Central Dispatch, and a MacPro that has the channels for a couple of GPU cards to run with it.

In the meantime, the current MacPro with an SSD based Accelsior PCIe card boots in 25 seconds and does nicely...faster than SATA2 or 3.

-hh
 
Finally an article to shut up all the, "Where's our Mac Pro!" posts. I mean.. I love you guys to death. I really do. But there were just so many complaints! <3 <3!
 
Hmmmm I doubt it. Why bang in 2tb drivers after spending all this time pushing thunderbolt.

Currently u can get pci SSDs in those sizes, though a 1.6 TB comes in at about 7000 pounds.

Though I say make it and let's profile the users who have zero common sense and heaps of $$$$$$$$$$ ;)
 
Forget

Forget the Mac Pros... where the hell is the update to the Thunderbolt display!?!? :apple::apple::apple:
 
Finally an article to shut up all the, "Where's our Mac Pro!" posts. I mean.. I love you guys to death. I really do. But there were just so many complaints! <3 <3!

Well wait till they see the price ;) get ready for a fresh wave of posts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.