I don't get it. If all Daimler or BMW are doing is manufacturing, why would they care about iCloud or whatever technology is behind Apple Car?
I call BS, but if the article does have some truth to it, I suspect it's more of a partnership than Apple's own car.
I imagine the rationale is close to why Apple doesn't license OS X or iOS to any other manufacturer. BMW and Mercedes want to protect their brand. If an Apple Car built by one of them is a total failure, then it damages their image. Why take that chance with a company that has no experience building, marketing, selling, and maintaining cars?
[doublepost=1461208627][/doublepost]
Aren't all those problems related to the internal combustion powertrain though? The Apple car is expected to be fully electric. There's no high pressure fuel pump to fail.
BMW's reputation for chassis, suspension, fit, and finish are all stellar.
I guess it's moot because BMW isn't making it.
The proof is in the pudding.
When I was selling used cars the extended service plan on a premium German car
was 2x-3x as expensive as on a premium Japanese car.
Probably because people were willing to pay more for the brand name.
[doublepost=1461208930][/doublepost]
With the exception of Toyota, none of the manufacturers you mentioned manufacture luxury cars. BMW or GM have superior battery tech. BMW has superior ancillary automotive systems, as well as longer experience making tech-laden cars (see E32, E31 et al.)
They simply want the best, highest quality partner.
Edit: Acura is not a luxury manufacturer. Their best selling car is a better-looking Pilot.
Tata motors owns Jaguar and Land Rover.