Again, I already acknowledged Apple Music on CarPlay is better than Bluetooth, no need to be disturbed or dramatic.
That's just it though, maybe today and tomorrow it is just those two. But 6 months from now there could be some new app that you'd really like to have in your car with a UI to be able to interface with it, CarPlay/AA Give you that ability without Tesla or anyone else standing in the way. Just like in the picture of this story, this browser/RPi based CarPlay only gives you a small window, which is plenty. You just need a platform that apps of the future can leverage, not sit around and hope that the manufacture will allow it.
Dear lord. I said "besides" those two because I already acknowledged those two (especially Apple Music), not because I was denying those two. You're disagreeing when we don't even disagree.
Can ABRP trigger preconditioning for faster DC charging?
Except you’ll likely have to pay $10 a month for the premium data package for any of those third party apps to work properly.
From a developers stand point, where does it end? So Tesla makes their own App store, cool I have to learn their development process and learn another SDK. Oh GM wants their own app store too, so I've gotta manage the software apps on that app store too. Then Ford follows suit, and then you're left with 20 different platforms and having to learn a multitude of development practices.
To answer the question, no it doesn't precondition the battery which is very important. There will be things that Tesla's infotainment does better, and in such cases use it
So your proposed solution, if Tesla implemented CarPlay: You would run a third-party app (ABRP) on your iPhone, which is connected via CarPlay (and displays much smaller than the built-in nav), and then you manually input that same route into the Tesla navigation when you need to pre-condition?
So you want Waze rather than ABRP, but you will still enter the Supercharger location manually into the Tesla nav to precondition?
Just trying to understand. It still sounds like a convoluted and ineloquent solution.
Cool, so it doesn't fit your use case congrats. There's going to be tons of things that don't fit your use case and will fit others. That's kind of the point, choice and personal preference. This isn't the iPhone in 2008 where you can have any color you want, as long as it's black. And then people also defended it back then that "Well why would you want any other color".
Actually, one last question: are you ACTUALLY Rob Schneider?
What are you trying to get across exactly? You're not really making an argument, you're just throwing around names. I've said before that Tesla should support CarPlay, and you're just going around and around saying that "preconditioning also makes very little difference in the climate and method i drive". Cool, give me a full synopsis of your entire day play by play and I'll try to come up with another example?
LOL, nice way to completely ignore everything and still not answer the question. This has larger impacts than just being a Tesla owner as it sets precedence, but if you want to think that because I don't own a Tesla then my opinion on bringing CarPlay over to a currently closed ecosystem is useless than so be it. Clearly I'm not having an educated debate, just speaking to a petulant child.
