Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nothing.

But also nothing wrong with not mentioning it.

"SJW" is a thing of the past cos now we have "ACMW".

Just as bad only 20 time more boring.

Personally I don’t care if people say merry Christmas or not. It doesn’t matter at all to me.
 
What are secular values exactly?

Speaking about "Judeo-Christian Values:"

“This is a term defined by exclusion,” said Shalom Goldman, a professor at Middlebury College in Vermont, arguing that the term is often used to reject secular values and Muslims.

“It’s essentially saying our values are not the values of the Enlightenment or the Constitution, but instead our values are the values of the Bible,” he said.

https://washingtonjewishweek.com/34907/judeo-christian-values/news/national-news/


Saying "Merry Christmas" is a phrase of exclusion and is divisive, which is why some raise it as a political issue to divide people.

Saying "Happy Holidays" is a phrase of inclusion, which is much more in keeping with Christ's message of love.
 
CHRISTmas. It's called Christmas.

Yes... for those that practice it.

But given that he’s representing a company in official capacity... and as a business he wants to sell to everyone and not just one group of people.............

Well, I’ll let you try to fill in the rest.

You’ll notice it’s businesses that use Happy Holidays, or people addressing large groups of people. Person to person, we have more knowledge of people and say appropriate terms.

Spring, Summer, Autumn (Fall, whatever), Winter. Those are the seasons. I don’t see Holiday in there, because it’s not a season.

This is an incredibly dumb post.

“Hey, I don’t see Game of Thrones up here either! Or Friends! Or Sopranos! The NFL/NHL/NBA/MLS/MLB aren’t up there! Those aren’t seasons so stop calling them seasons!”

A season is a period of any year, of indeterminate length, characterized by activities, events, festivities, weather, features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justanotherfanboy
“This is a term defined by exclusion,” said Shalom Goldman, a professor at Middlebury College in Vermont, arguing that the term is often used to reject secular values and Muslims.
So naming something is always the rejection of everything else that is not named and therefore "defined by exclusion"? That makes no sense.

“It’s essentially saying our values are not the values of the Enlightenment or the Constitution, but instead our values are the values of the Bible,” he said.
Like I said before, the values of enlightenment and of the constitution didn't just magically appear out of nowhere.

Saying "Merry Christmas" is a phrase of exclusion and is divisive, which is why some raise it as a political issue to divide people.
Saying "Happy Holidays" is a phrase of inclusion, which is much more in keeping with Christ's message of love.
I don't see it. If I wish somebody "Merry Christmas" it has nothing to do with whatever the hell that person believes in. If the person I'm directing it to happens to be muslim or atheistic, I'm not saying "Burn in hell", I'm still saying "Merry Christmas". Besides, the term "Holidays" still originates from a secular context, literally saying "Holy days". So isn't the term a phrase of exclusion towards non-religious people? I don't see where this kind of ignorant reading of everything out of context, independently of intention and cultural background, is ending. It makes no sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094 and Huck
I don't see it. If I wish somebody "Merry Christmas" it has nothing to do with whatever the hell that person believes in. If the person I'm directing it to happens to be muslim or atheistic, I'm not saying "Burn in hell", I'm still saying "Merry Christmas".

Tim Cook wasn't saying it to "somebody," he was saying it to "everybody."

There's a difference when speaking to an individual and a group.

Saying "Merry Christmas" to a group, excludes non-Christians from the message, while saying "Happy Holidays" includes everyone.

I'm willing to bet that in person, Tim Cook wishes "Happy Hanukkah" or "Merry Christmas" to personal acquaintances when appropriate.

The converse of claiming "Happy Holidays" is a war on Christians would be to claim that saying "Merry Christmas" is a war on Muslims, Jews, and non believers.
 
This is an incredibly dumb post.

“Hey, I don’t see Game of Thrones up here either! Or Friends! Or Sopranos! The NFL/NHL/NBA/MLS/MLB aren’t up there! Those aren’t seasons so stop calling them seasons!”

A season is a period of any year, of indeterminate length, characterized by activities, events, festivities, weather, features.
[doublepost=1544364523][/doublepost]
I'm willing to bet that in person, Tim Cook wishes "Happy Hanukkah" or "Merry Christmas" to personal acquaintances when appropriate.
You’d win that bet.

Also, on the actual day we celebrate Christmas, Tim Cook will tweet a Merry Christmas to everyone, just as he does with Diwali, Easter, and many other holidays.
 
The converse of claiming that saying "Happy Holidays" is a war on Christians would be to claim that saying "Merry Christmas" is a war on Muslims, Jews, and non beleivers.
First of all, I don't really think the use of "Happy Holidays" is that controversial. It's around for quite some time and has its purpose. I'm not thinking that the phrase is in any way a war on Christmas or Christians. After all, it's still pretty evident from going into an American mall that it is indeed Christmas that is about to come.

Saying "Merry Christmas" to a group, excludes non-Christians from the message, while saying "Happy Holidays" includes everyone.
I don't see it. Saying "Merry Christmas" is not saying "Merry Christmas to all the Christians and burn in hell to the rest of you". Christmas is not a thing that is exclusively celebrated by Christians. In fact most people I know that are celebrating Christmas haven't seen the inside of a church for years.

So no, I don't see the explicit exclusion here. You need to make a lot of assumptions to actually coin it that way. And again, I see no problem in saying "Happy Holidays", it's fine by me. But saying that everybody who instead wishes a Merry Christmas is a monster trying to exclude people is a horrible misinterpretation that I reject.

And like I said before, if you assume "Merry Christmas" is a term of exclusion, then "Happy Holidays" can be interpreted in the same way. What about people that do not celebrate anything in these days? What about people without any family? What about people who can't afford to take a break in this time? What about people who are currently depressed? These people will indeed feel excluded from this message. But that's just what life is and that's just how society works. You can't include everybody, there are not any 100% inclusive words, phrases or whatever.
 
I am sure the employees were told to not record or face termination. It would be in violation of copyright. Nobody is going to want to lose their job by posting it.
I wonder if her song(s) specifically referred to Christmas?
The problem is you want to use a word, but then you make it so generic that the word has no-meaning any more... job done?
Yes, the job is done - much like "have a good day" or "hi" connotes warmer feelings than saying nothing. Would you actually be offended if I said, "Have a good day", or do I have to say something like "I really hope you have a great day, <your name>, and I really mean that."? The real issue is that you read negatives by a generic greeting that really aren't there. Best you can do is just ignore the greeting as if nothing was said.
[doublepost=1544368827][/doublepost]
What are secular values exactly?
Values devoid of any religious affiliation - one can have values without some supernatural system for approval or verification. Pain and pleasure, hate and love, respect and disdain, politeness or rudeness, justice or tyranny, need no religion to authenticate. One can use religion to back up or invalidate such values, but it isn't a necessary foundation. Being intelligent or sane enough to understand good vs. bad is sufficient. History has demonstrated that religion has done at least as much to inflict pain as to alleviate it, as all of the negative response to something as simple as "Happy Holidays" seems to illustrate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: imageWIS and robbyx
This thread certainly killed the Christmas spirit. Way to go party poopers.
 
It always amazes me how so many here give Tim Cook so much power and bandwidth into their lives.

Not healthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbyx
I wonder if her song(s) specifically referred to Christmas?

Yes, the job is done - much like "have a good day" or "hi" connotes warmer feelings than saying nothing. Would you actually be offended if I said, "Have a good day", or do I have to say something like "I really hope you have a great day, <your name>, and I really mean that."? The real issue is that you read negatives by a generic greeting that really aren't there. Best you can do is just ignore the greeting as if nothing was said.
[doublepost=1544368827][/doublepost]
Values devoid of any religious affiliation - one can have values without some supernatural system for approval or verification. Pain and pleasure, hate and love, respect and disdain, politeness or rudeness, justice or tyranny, need no religion to authenticate. One can use religion to back up or invalidate such values, but it isn't a necessary foundation. Being intelligent or sane enough to understand good vs. bad is sufficient. History has demonstrated that religion has had at least as much to inflict pain as to alleviate it, as all of the negative response to something as simple as "Happy Holidays" seems to illustrate.
Well to quote The Dead Kennedys "California Über Alles." (look it up)
 
Saying the US is a Christian nation is not correct (at least not literally in the sense of other theocracies), but the US certainly is founded on Christian values. You may say it's founded on values of enlightenment, but they are in their own right heavily influenced by Christian ideals. Same goes for most Western civilizations. I think nothing is won by relativizing those roots and pretending like we were just lucky that liberalism fell into our laps. It didn't just magically appear, it came a long way.

The Founding Fathers were in many ways far more influenced by Greek and Roman forms of government than anything having to do with christianity... since christian form of government is a celestial dictatorship controlled by fear masquerading as 'love'.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.